New Microsoft Tech Makes Battery Changes a Breeze
in [Embedded]
|
Prev: need ur help for my Masters project(TASM project)
Next: Full-featured Controller Area Network simulator available for free
From: Mark Harriss on 7 Jul 2010 07:09 Don McKenzie wrote: > New Microsoft Tech Makes Battery Changes a Breeze > > http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2365995,00.asp > > On Thursday, Microsoft announced a technology called InstaLoad, which > will allow you to insert a battery into electronic devices any way you > please. > > The InstaLoad technology will be licensed on a royalty-free basis, > Microsoft said. Duracell was named as a partner for the technology, as > well as several manaufacturers of electronic devices, including > ClearSound's hearing aids, NovaTac's LED flashlights, and Black > Diamond's headlamps for mountaineering. > > Cheers Don... > > > Sheesh!, why not just make conical cells 5mm wider at the base so they only go in one way.
From: Boudewijn Dijkstra on 7 Jul 2010 07:54 Op Sat, 03 Jul 2010 02:59:00 +0200 schreef Chris Burrows <cfbsoftware(a)hotmail.com>: > "Don McKenzie" <5V(a)2.5A> wrote in message > news:8977vaFsn5U1(a)mid.individual.net... >> > I have an alternative idea. Redesign batteries so that they have a > positive terminal at each end and the body is negative. How would that work in flash-lights that take three batteries in line? > Bring in O.H & S legislation Uhm, what? -- Gemaakt met Opera's revolutionaire e-mailprogramma: http://www.opera.com/mail/ (remove the obvious prefix to reply by mail)
From: atec77 on 7 Jul 2010 09:15 On 7/07/2010 9:54 PM, Boudewijn Dijkstra wrote: > Op Sat, 03 Jul 2010 02:59:00 +0200 schreef Chris Burrows > <cfbsoftware(a)hotmail.com>: >> "Don McKenzie" <5V(a)2.5A> wrote in message >> news:8977vaFsn5U1(a)mid.individual.net... >>> >> I have an alternative idea. Redesign batteries so that they have a >> positive terminal at each end and the body is negative. > > How would that work in flash-lights that take three batteries in line? ferpectly well > >> Bring in O.H & S legislation > > Uhm, what? Occupational health an safety legislation www.jfgit.com > > > > -- X-No-Archive: Yes
From: who where on 7 Jul 2010 22:58 On Wed, 07 Jul 2010 21:09:27 +1000, Mark Harriss <billy(a)blartco.co.uk> wrote: >Sheesh!, why not just make conical cells 5mm wider at the base so they >only go in one way. they'd be a c#$t of a shape to feed into series "tube" installations, losing any real self-aligning potential.
From: Mark Harriss on 8 Jul 2010 05:32
who where wrote: > On Wed, 07 Jul 2010 21:09:27 +1000, Mark Harriss <billy(a)blartco.co.uk> > wrote: > >> Sheesh!, why not just make conical cells 5mm wider at the base so they >> only go in one way. > > they'd be a c#$t of a shape to feed into series "tube" installations, > losing any real self-aligning potential. So the ends self align and interlock, it's not that hard to do. |