Newton's law of gravitational attraction
in [Relativity]
|
From: Inertial on 28 Sep 2009 19:11 "NoEinstein" <noeinstein(a)bellsouth.net> wrote in message news:b024d9b8-84c9-456a-8d96-151683fed85e(a)e34g2000vbm.googlegroups.com... > On Sep 26, 9:05 pm, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: >> > Dear Inertial: Uncontrolled laughter in an airhead is a sure sign of > mental illness. Get help! � NE � Get fvcked
From: Y.Porat on 28 Sep 2009 21:25 On Sep 28, 9:26 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Sep 28, 12:08 pm, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Mr PD you forgo tests. > > > > > sometines 2 3 5 times bigger > > but that is jsut in order of the safly factor > > and then we see that the structure > > broke !1 > > got it IN A HIGHER ENERGY THE STRUCTRE BREALES !! > > got it > > yuo ucant fiddle with enourmous differences df enery > > every beginner in science knows the limiys of symetry laws !! > > again > > limit of symerty beaking > > > EACH PROCESS HAS IT S LIMIT OF ENERGY LEVER > > > for instance > > for the solid phase yo have the ordibant temperture > > for liqiod another level > > for plasma completely laws of plasme than solid > > > gliding beyNd the SPECIFIC energy level > > foe a certain symetry law you get > > BREAKING OF THE SYMERTY LAW OF THAT > > phase > > > at e Bgig Bang there were certian enelgy levels > > later while it cooled down completely other particles > > were created etc etc etc > > so in short Mr PD > > yo u are yalking tosoemone who understand a bit the basic of physice > > there for can tell you when a trheory is > > DEAD BNY ARRIVAL !! > > spplease dont senf me to liberraris to spend my > > (and your !!)precious time > > anytime we meet nonsense physics > > btw > > i dont understand waht is you 'religious fight > > to protect theories that are not yours > > and you dont really and deeply understand it all along . ie to > > be ''hermetically closed '' > > iow > > AND AT THE END OF THE DAY IT IS NOT *YOUR **** THEORY AT ALL ** !! > > Nor am I claiming it is. That's why I'm suggesting you to to PUBLIC > resources to find out what the real information is. > > > > > dont be a sucker > > and dont consider all others to be suckers !!! > > > ATB > > Y.Porat > > ------------------------ you abstart hand wavings does not impress me nore shouldimpress anyone the devil isin the detailes i said that the eenrgy leevl of that huge accelerator is not theone that isin our every day life it as nothing to do with it you speal lofty about desighning experiments and interpretating it he very notion that waht you get in the huge accelerator is waht you get in out every day matter that byitself is WRONG INTERPRETATION! as i told you eachenery level has its lwas of symetry once you out ot the elergy level by MANY ORDERS OF ENERGY LEVEL **THERE IS NO CONNECTION BETWEEN YOUR ACCELERATOR AND EVERY DAY DEALITY !!! and i actually make it much shotter our dispute: you ahven t explain your model eevn not experimentally TO FIT EVEN YOUR THEORY while ***YOU STILL MISSING PARTICLES IN THAT FAIRY STORY OF YOURS you are missing some particles that you youself mentioned and i even didnt know about that fact you miss as well the Higgs Boson though the huge efforts to find it !! you cant present it as a minor 'hole'just because you present it as a minor 'hole' !! your theory ids full of holes as i indicated and you could not answer them (jut by sending me to yiour stupid parrots library i saw just the vikipedia and it was enough tfo rme to realize that it is dead by arrival force messengers that are 100 times bigegr than their mother !! only a stupid mathematician whould accelt it without blinking an eye !! ... so even according to your rules of game you pose falsely that the above theory is ;proven! ('hemetically") it is enough that you will not be able to find a single particle that needed to your theory THAT YOUR THEORY IS INCONSISTENT EVEN BY YOUR OWN RULES UNLESS YOU ARE CHEATING SHAMELESSLY !! iow what yo do here i s more propaganda than science !!! and in propaganda some times the bigegr the lie the more chance to be accepted by suckers !! but not me and alike me !! but you cant cheat every body forever !! Y.Porat -------------------------------
From: Inertial on 28 Sep 2009 22:30 "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:355c55a5-12af-4532-b868-efe8bcf53419(a)v25g2000yqk.googlegroups.com... > it is enough that you will not be able to find a single particle that > needed to your theory > THAT YOUR THEORY IS INCONSISTENT EVEN BY YOUR > OWN RULES > UNLESS YOU ARE CHEATING > SHAMELESSLY !! > iow > what yo do here i s more propaganda than science !!! > and in propaganda some times > the bigegr the lie > the more chance to be accepted by suckers !! > but not me and alike me !! > > but you cant cheat every body forever !! > Y.Porat Yet again, we find a crackpot accusing others of the very shortcomings and failing of himself. You can't cheat everybody forever, Porat. But most have us have already worked out that you don't understand physics in the slightest.
From: doug on 28 Sep 2009 23:50 Inertial wrote: > > "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > news:355c55a5-12af-4532-b868-efe8bcf53419(a)v25g2000yqk.googlegroups.com... > >> it is enough that you will not be able to find a single particle that >> needed to your theory >> THAT YOUR THEORY IS INCONSISTENT EVEN BY YOUR >> OWN RULES >> UNLESS YOU ARE CHEATING >> SHAMELESSLY !! >> iow >> what yo do here i s more propaganda than science !!! >> and in propaganda some times >> the bigegr the lie >> the more chance to be accepted by suckers !! >> but not me and alike me !! >> >> but you cant cheat every body forever !! >> Y.Porat > > > Yet again, we find a crackpot accusing others of the very shortcomings > and failing of himself. You can't cheat everybody forever, Porat. But > most have us have already worked out that you don't understand physics > in the slightest. Porat has not worked out that his complete lack of knowledge of grammar is matched only by his complete lack of knowledge of science. Even if he were to make any science sense, which he does not, it would be hidden behind his ignorance of how to present it.
From: Y.Porat on 29 Sep 2009 01:02
On Sep 29, 4:30 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > news:355c55a5-12af-4532-b868-efe8bcf53419(a)v25g2000yqk.googlegroups.com... > > > it is enough that you will not be able to find a single particle that > > needed to your theory > > THAT YOUR THEORY IS INCONSISTENT EVEN BY YOUR > > OWN RULES > > UNLESS YOU ARE CHEATING > > SHAMELESSLY !! > > iow > > what yo do here i s more propaganda than science !!! > > and in propaganda some times > > the bigegr the lie > > the more chance to be accepted by suckers !! > > but not me and alike me !! > > > but you cant cheat every body forever !! > > Y.Porat > > Yet again, we find a crackpot accusing others of the very shortcomings and > failing of himself. You can't cheat everybody forever, Porat. But most > have us have already worked out that you don't understand physics in the > slightest. ---------------------- litle Josef Goebbels speak ** physics arguments*!! we dont need your Goebbels propaganda here Y.P ---------------------------------------------- |