Newton's law of gravitational attraction
in [Relativity]
|
From: Inertial on 13 Jan 2010 17:46 "NoEinstein" <noeinstein(a)bellsouth.net> wrote in message news:a0156df6-7bc4-46dc-814c-400764ff90d9(a)b2g2000yqi.googlegroups.com... > On Jan 11, 2:36 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> > Dear PD, the Parasite Dunce: My thought processes are evident in most > of my replies for the past three years. Yes.. its hilarious watching you distort physics and logic and make such ludicrous claims and attempt to justify them.
From: PD on 13 Jan 2010 18:04 On Jan 13, 3:22 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > On Jan 11, 2:36 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Dear PD, the Parasite Dunce: My thought processes are evident in most > of my replies for the past three years. On the other hand, your > "thought processes" (ha!) consist of claiming that I am wrong as > though you are the final judge. Not at all. You are just making statements that are counter to documented evidence. I'm not the judge. Nature is. I'm just pointing out that it is. If Ronnie says that 2+7=8, and Donnie tells him this is wrong, then it's not a matter of whether Donnie has a better reputation than Ronnie or whether Donnie can teach Ronnie. Ronnie is simply wrong. Ronnie can go look up what 2+7 is. > But you never discuss science! You > only disparage any proof I givewhich was largely based on reasonby > claiming that there is other data out there (which you are of course > unwilling to paraphrase) that says otherewise. That's right. I expect you to do that homework for yourself. > Most readers of this > don't know you from Adam. And that doesn't matter. The validity of my remarks doesn't stem from my reputation or whether people know me. This isn't an opinion poll. You are making statements that are counter to documented fact. > You don't give links to any new posts that > you have made, but claim that they are out there. In short, you claim > expertise which is nowhere in evidence. It is certainly in evidence, and I even suggested a tool you can use to locate it. I simply refuse to cut your meat for you. > Your only... "worth", PD, is > in giving me cause to keep restating my New Science for the thinking > readers who are out there. So, I suppose you are doing a service... > But mainly, you are just a pain. NoEinstein
From: PD on 13 Jan 2010 18:16 On Jan 13, 4:13 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > On Jan 11, 5:55 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Dear Pd, the Parasite Dunce: I said: "Matter can emit photons, such > as infrared, but no mass is lost in the process." You said: "That's > not so. There is mass lost or gained in any chemical reaction as well. > Chemists usually ignore it, but it's there." > > Wow! You must have FLUNKED chemistry! All chemical reactions require > at least two different elements to combine! Oh, I dunno about that. Take a look at a chemistry book where you'll find a chapter on radioactive decay. Moreover, I said that mass is lost or gained in any chemical reaction AS WELL as the one you referred to. > ATOMIC DECAY involves > only a single element, and is thus NOT a chemical reaction. You see, > PD, opening your mouth to discuss science, more often than not, will > have you putting your foot in it! Ha, ha, HA! NoEinstein >
From: PD on 13 Jan 2010 18:17 On Jan 13, 4:15 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > On Jan 11, 5:57 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Jan 11, 2:14 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > Well! Now PD is requiring that I (or others) must pay to hear him > > > discuss actual science! > > > If you want summaries of scientific papers, yes, you have to pay for > > it. > > Of course, you could just read the scientific papers for free on your > > own. > > But you want your food chewed for you. Services like that warrant a > > fee. > > > > Since he has never discussed science in the > > > past, then, I would suppose that the amount of money PD could command > > > for looking things up would be minus infinity dollars. Ha, ha, HA! > > > NoEinstein - Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > How much money have you made chewing other people's food for them, > PD? NoEinstein A fair amount. That's what teaching courses partly is about. And that draws a salary.
From: NoEinstein on 19 Jan 2010 19:35
On Jan 13, 5:46 pm, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > "NoEinstein" <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote in message > > news:a0156df6-7bc4-46dc-814c-400764ff90d9(a)b2g2000yqi.googlegroups.com... > > > On Jan 11, 2:36 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > Dear PD, the Parasite Dunce: My thought processes are evident in most > > of my replies for the past three years. > > Yes.. its hilarious watching you distort physics and logic and make such > ludicrous claims and attempt to justify them. .... and your "issue" with my New Science is? Either talk science or comment in the toilet. NE |