Newton's law of gravitational attraction
in [Physics]
|
Prev: New Volcanic Activity This Week- Three~~ Total 16 active
Next: Solutions manual to Intermediate Accounting 13e Kieso
From: PD on 27 Nov 2009 15:42 On Nov 25, 7:54 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > On Nov 20, 2:22 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Dear PD, the Parasite Dunce: You've committed a cardinal sin: > Improperly paraphrasing my words, Then clarify what you mean when you say that what's written in 7th grade science books is wrong. > then making fun of your OWN > misunderstanding. Such shows how desperate you are in the face of > overwhelming evidence of your being wrong... again and again and > again. You can't understand a single thing about physics beyond what > you so blindly accepted in seventh grade. Is what's taught in your 7th grade science book wrong? > They should erect a statue > of you standing in the corner wearing a pointed hat, with the title > DUNCE. NoEinstein > > > > > On Nov 20, 1:06 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > On Nov 12, 9:32 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Dear PD, the Parasite Dunce: The fact that you inject so much of your > > > errant thinking into my concisely explained scientific positions > > > proves that I have touched on your... 'soft spot'. That's the half of > > > your skull which never 'closed' following your birth. Give it up, > > > fellow. Science isn't what you read in the seventh grade. Science is > > > an evolving truth always vulnerable to a better and simpler > > > explanation. NoEinstein > > > Aha. Such is the Fine Art of Self-Rationalization. > > > "He says it's a mistake on my part. But no, it must in fact be > > correct, and he is only complaining because I have hit on a tender > > spot! How I know I am right is precisely when they tell me I am wrong! > > If I were wrong, they would say nothing at all!" > > > You just keep telling yourself that, NoEinstein. > > > Now that you've convinced yourself that what's written in 7th grade > > science books is wrong, then perhaps it's time to question the math > > you were taught in the 5th grade. In fact, probably everything you've > > EVER been taught from 1st grade on is probably wrong, all wrong, and > > is in dire need of replacement by new truths that you invent. > > > PD
From: NoEinstein on 28 Nov 2009 17:45 On Nov 25, 10:28 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > Dear Burt: God may indeed be responsible for gravity, but that God isn't you! When ether energy concentrates to become matter (that which can be PUSHED by ether flow as the result of the emission of photons or charged particles that change the ether density and flow in the region), large parts of the Universe become devoid of ether. That's what causes the 'Swiss cheese" voids between galaxies. If there is no ether between most galaxies, then, there can't be the ether flow necessary to cause the Universe to act like one big gravity unit. Additionally, gravity SHUTS OFF when the emission of photons or charged particles stops, such as when huge stars turn into Black Holes. There is no such thing as a super-massive black hole. The latter have wrongly been assumed to be at the center of most galaxies because the estimated mass of the stars in those galaxies wasn't great enough to 'hold in' the stars based on the observed rotational speeds of the galaxies. That PROBLEM happened because the masses of galaxies was based on Newton's errant 'Universal Law of Gravity'which never took into account that very hot bodies have much more gravitational attraction than Earth - moon type bodies exhibit. Additionally, because of the over-estimation of the masses of those orbiting stars, the actual 'fly-away' force is far less than has been supposed. Taken together, the gravity increase and the mass decrease should cancel the need to locate that supposed, but non-existent, 90% of the Universe that would have to be... "Dark Matter." All of these facts are the result of my realizing this simple fact of ether flow: "Nothing OUT means nothing will flow in!" Continuous ether flow, which is the MECHANISM of gravity, must constantly be replenished by photon or charged particle flow outward. When massive stars go Black, the photons and charged particles stop flowing outward. The star distribution data for the Andromeda Galaxy shows that the central gravity shut off and let the stars which were about to be consumed, fly out on their tangents for a short distance until the total galaxy mass stopped that fly-away. So, there is more "reason" to the behavior of the Universe than just saying... God did it! I can't explain how the ether energy got there in the first place. But everything after that is understandable by reason, without having to escape into... Higher Powers. NoEinstein > > On Nov 25, 6:57 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > On Nov 20, 3:03 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > The strength of gravity is a push toward the center of mass in space > > > and aether. > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > Give it up, Burt. The force (strength) of gravity varies in > > God is doing gravity. > > > > > proportion to the ether density and flow at any particular place in > > the universe. Gravity does NOT act over distances much greater than > > the typical galactic interval. So, there isn't some "stop the > > expansion" gravity worth seeking, nor is there a missing mass that > > would be needed to slow down the Hubble expansion. There is NO > > expansion of the Universe taking place, and there was NO Big Bang!! > > Newton and Einstein screwed things up. Einstein gave shallow > > physicists an escape (Could that be inside of a... STRING? Ha, ha > > HA!) by saying that space and time don't exist near massive objects. > > And Newton goofed by sticking the word UNIVERSAL in front of an > > equation that is only apt to Earth - Moon and some observed solar > > system planets' motions. The mass of the Sun has been wrongly > > calculated, but the force of its gravity is accurate. I can say one > > thing, Burt: You keep putting you don't figure ideas out there.. Is > > anyone listening? NoEinstein - Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
From: NoEinstein on 28 Nov 2009 17:57 On Nov 25, 11:25 pm, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > Dear Inertial: Blanket statements relating to... "the messenger" let those like youwith no aptitude for scienceseem to be all-knowing. If you are such an expert (ha!), please point out ANY point of my science which you can PROVE to be in error that doesn't quote existing textbooks written by those with very little understanding of science. Unless you can do the latter, then, your credibility to even comment on my science makes you little more than an un-invited party crasher who is there to steal the good food and drink. NoEinstein > > "NoEinstein" <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote in message > > news:265b3886-09c2-42d4-8c42-934eb4a7c5b3(a)j19g2000yqk.googlegroups.com... > > > On Nov 20, 2:22 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > Dear PD, the Parasite Dunce: You've committed a cardinal sin: > > Improperly paraphrasing my words, then making fun of your OWN > > misunderstanding. Such shows how desperate you are in the face of > > overwhelming evidence of your being wrong... again and again and > > again. You can't understand a single thing about physics beyond what > > you so blindly accepted in seventh grade. They should erect a statue > > of you standing in the corner wearing a pointed hat, with the title > > DUNCE. NoEinstein > > Funny how crackpots like you attribute to others your own errors. All that > you wrote supposedly about PD actually applies far better to yourself
From: BURT on 28 Nov 2009 18:00 On Nov 28, 2:45 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > On Nov 25, 10:28 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > Dear Burt: God may indeed be responsible for gravity, but that God > isn't you! When ether energy concentrates to become matter (that > which can be PUSHED by ether flow as the result of the emission of > photons or charged particles that change the ether density and flow in > the region), large parts of the Universe become devoid of ether. > That's what causes the 'Swiss cheese" voids between galaxies. If > there is no ether between most galaxies, then, there can't be the > ether flow necessary to cause the Universe to act like one big gravity > unit. Additionally, gravity SHUTS OFF when the emission of photons or > charged particles stops, such as when huge stars turn into Black > Holes. There is no such thing as a super-massive black hole. The > latter have wrongly been assumed to be at the center of most galaxies > because the estimated mass of the stars in those galaxies wasn't great > enough to 'hold in' the stars based on the observed rotational speeds > of the galaxies. That PROBLEM happened because the masses of galaxies > was based on Newton's errant 'Universal Law of Gravity'which never > took into account that very hot bodies have much more gravitational > attraction than Earth - moon type bodies exhibit. Additionally, > because of the over-estimation of the masses of those orbiting stars, > the actual 'fly-away' force is far less than has been supposed. Taken > together, the gravity increase and the mass decrease should cancel the > need to locate that supposed, but non-existent, 90% of the Universe > that would have to be... "Dark Matter." All of these facts are the > result of my realizing this simple fact of ether flow: "Nothing OUT > means nothing will flow in!" Continuous ether flow, which is the > MECHANISM of gravity, must constantly be replenished by photon or > charged particle flow outward. When massive stars go Black, the > photons and charged particles stop flowing outward. The star > distribution data for the Andromeda Galaxy shows that the central > gravity shut off and let the stars which were about to be consumed, > fly out on their tangents for a short distance until the total galaxy > mass stopped that fly-away. > > So, there is more "reason" to the behavior of the Universe than just > saying... God did it! I can't explain how the ether energy got there > in the first place. But everything after that is understandable by > reason, without having to escape into... Higher Powers. NoEinstein > > > > > > > > On Nov 25, 6:57 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > On Nov 20, 3:03 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > The strength of gravity is a push toward the center of mass in space > > > > and aether. > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > Give it up, Burt. The force (strength) of gravity varies in > > > God is doing gravity. > > > > proportion to the ether density and flow at any particular place in > > > the universe. Gravity does NOT act over distances much greater than > > > the typical galactic interval. So, there isn't some "stop the > > > expansion" gravity worth seeking, nor is there a missing mass that > > > would be needed to slow down the Hubble expansion. There is NO > > > expansion of the Universe taking place, and there was NO Big Bang!! > > > Newton and Einstein screwed things up. Einstein gave shallow > > > physicists an escape (Could that be inside of a... STRING? Ha, ha > > > HA!) by saying that space and time don't exist near massive objects. > > > And Newton goofed by sticking the word UNIVERSAL in front of an > > > equation that is only apt to Earth - Moon and some observed solar > > > system planets' motions. The mass of the Sun has been wrongly > > > calculated, but the force of its gravity is accurate. I can say one > > > thing, Burt: You keep putting you don't figure ideas out there. Is > > > anyone listening? NoEinstein - Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - God is doing one thing in the universe and that is the gravity in all its strengths. Mitch Raemsch
From: NoEinstein on 28 Nov 2009 18:04
On Nov 27, 3:42 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Nice try, PD. I'm the one doing the science, here. You are simply the dunce detractor. I've regularly invited you to prove me wrong on any issue. Your only "proof" is that long forgotten seventh grade textbook of yours. Prove me wrong by REASON, not by convention. Since reasoning requires a brain, you've failed thus far. I don't expect you to ever pass a course on TRUE physics. NoEinstein > > On Nov 25, 7:54 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > On Nov 20, 2:22 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > Dear PD, the Parasite Dunce: You've committed a cardinal sin: > > Improperly paraphrasing my words, > > Then clarify what you mean when you say that what's written in 7th > grade science books is wrong. > > > then making fun of your OWN > > misunderstanding. Such shows how desperate you are in the face of > > overwhelming evidence of your being wrong... again and again and > > again. You can't understand a single thing about physics beyond what > > you so blindly accepted in seventh grade. > > Is what's taught in your 7th grade science book wrong? > > > > > They should erect a statue > > of you standing in the corner wearing a pointed hat, with the title > > DUNCE. NoEinstein > > > > On Nov 20, 1:06 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > On Nov 12, 9:32 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Dear PD, the Parasite Dunce: The fact that you inject so much of your > > > > errant thinking into my concisely explained scientific positions > > > > proves that I have touched on your... 'soft spot'. That's the half of > > > > your skull which never 'closed' following your birth. Give it up, > > > > fellow. Science isn't what you read in the seventh grade. Science is > > > > an evolving truth always vulnerable to a better and simpler > > > > explanation. NoEinstein > > > > Aha. Such is the Fine Art of Self-Rationalization. > > > > "He says it's a mistake on my part. But no, it must in fact be > > > correct, and he is only complaining because I have hit on a tender > > > spot! How I know I am right is precisely when they tell me I am wrong! > > > If I were wrong, they would say nothing at all!" > > > > You just keep telling yourself that, NoEinstein. > > > > Now that you've convinced yourself that what's written in 7th grade > > > science books is wrong, then perhaps it's time to question the math > > > you were taught in the 5th grade. In fact, probably everything you've > > > EVER been taught from 1st grade on is probably wrong, all wrong, and > > > is in dire need of replacement by new truths that you invent. > > > > PD- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - |