Nikon D3000 a piece of junk?
in [Digital Cameras]
|
Prev: SI Facescape comment
Next: Don't view on a full stomach
From: RichA on 19 May 2010 18:42 On May 19, 6:39 am, Bruce <docnews2...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, 18 May 2010 20:19:25 -0700 (PDT), RichA <rander3...(a)gmail.com> > wrote: > > >This lemon really does seem to be the odd man out in the Nikon line- > >up. The D5000 is far better. Did Nikon have some CCDs left over and > >had to use them up? Seems like the D40/40x got much better reviews > >and they came before the D3000. > > It's definitely not a lemon. > > Like every other manufacturer's entry-level DSLR, it's kind of ... > > ... entry-level. It's like...they didn't care. How else to explain the worst JPEG's on the planet?
From: Bruce on 19 May 2010 23:30 On Wed, 19 May 2010 15:42:02 -0700 (PDT), RichA <rander3127(a)gmail.com> wrote: >On May 19, 6:39�am, Bruce <docnews2...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> On Tue, 18 May 2010 20:19:25 -0700 (PDT), RichA <rander3...(a)gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> >This lemon really does seem to be the odd man out in the Nikon line- >> >up. �The D5000 is far better. �Did Nikon have some CCDs left over and >> >had to use them up? �Seems like the D40/40x got much better reviews >> >and they came before the D3000. >> >> It's definitely not a lemon. � >> >> Like every other manufacturer's entry-level DSLR, it's kind of ... >> >> ... entry-level. > >It's like...they didn't care. How else to explain the worst JPEG's on >the planet? Better than Sony's entry-level junk using the same sensor. ;-)
From: Ray Fischer on 22 May 2010 16:19
RichA <rander3127(a)gmail.com> wrote: >This lemon really does seem to be the odd man out in the Nikon line- Rich hates everything. -- Ray Fischer rfischer(a)sonic.net |