Prev: Freeware duplicate named file finder
Next: Bear Bottoms' Junk Food: Suicide
From: Parker51 on 17 Jun 2010 04:50
"Le Loup" <lelouptheatre(a)x.fr> wrote in message
news:Xns9D9A6C438BB6Blelouptheatrefreefr(a)193.252.117.183...
> Le 17 juin 2010, "Man-wai Chang to The Door (33600bps)"
> <toylet.toylet(a)gmail.com> a tapot� ce qui suit :
>
>>>> Filezilla
>>>>
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>
>> +2
>>
>
> +3 !
>


+4


From: John Corliss on 17 Jun 2010 04:55
Craig wrote:
> idle wrote:
>> PDFrank wrote:
>>>
>>> Can someone suggest a good, free replacement FTP program?
>>
>> Filezilla
>
> +1

Craig, any idea why, at the download page for Filezilla:

http://filezilla-project.org/download.php?type=client

the setup file is recommended over the .zip download?

--
John Corliss BS206. Because of all the Googlespam, I block all posts
sent through Google Groups. I also block as many posts from anonymous
remailers (like x-privat.org for eg.) as possible due to forgeries
posted through them.

No ad, CD, commercial, cripple, demo, nag, share, spy, time-limited,
trial or web wares OR warez for me, please. Adobe Flash sucks, DivX rules.

"First thing we do, we kill all the advertisers..."
From: badgolferman on 17 Jun 2010 06:16
PDFrank, 6/16/2010,11:41:53 PM, wrote:

> Can someone suggest a good, free replacement FTP program?
>
> Thanks.

Filezilla is highly recommended as you can see. The one I have settled
on because it works better with some sites I must access is Core FTP
LE. It's also more like WS FTP LE in user interface.

From: Duddits on 17 Jun 2010 09:17
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 09:50:31 +0100, "Parker51" <parker(a)51.com> wrote:

>"Le Loup" <lelouptheatre(a)x.fr> wrote in message
>news:Xns9D9A6C438BB6Blelouptheatrefreefr(a)193.252.117.183...
>> Le 17 juin 2010, "Man-wai Chang to The Door (33600bps)"
>> <toylet.toylet(a)gmail.com> a tapot� ce qui suit :
>>
>>>>> Filezilla
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>
>>> +2
>>>
>>
>> +3 !
>>
>
>
>+4
>
+5
http://filezilla-project.org/

regards

Dud
--
Space is disease and danger wrapped in darkness and silence.

Leonard McCoy
From: Craig on 17 Jun 2010 09:32
On 06/17/2010 01:55 AM, John Corliss wrote:
>
> Craig, any idea why, at the download page for Filezilla:
>
> http://filezilla-project.org/download.php?type=client
>
> the setup file is recommended over the .zip download?

I dunno (I'm not booting much in Windows anymore and this isn't an issue
in Linux) but here's what they say.

hth...

> Installer version
>
> As a novice user the installer version is the safe and easy choice.
> With this version you only need to download the file, run it and the
> program will get installed by itself. The installer version also
> comes with so called debug files which helps solve problems should a
> program crash occur. If you don't know which version to get, this is
> probably the one you want. However, if you don't have sufficient
> rights to install programs on the computer you are using (e.g. at
> work or at school) the zip version is the way to go. If you've
> already decided to go for the installer version, you can go directly
> to downloading.

<http://wiki.filezilla-project.org/Client_Installation>


--
-Craig
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4
Prev: Freeware duplicate named file finder
Next: Bear Bottoms' Junk Food: Suicide