From: S.D.A. on
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 08:50:22AM +0100, Anthony Campbell uttered:
> On 31 Mar 2010, S.D.A. wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > Speaking of this issue (FTP master being down); I did an 'aptitude
> > update' for my SID laptop this morning. Says over 900 packages need to
> > be updated! Now I know it's been a few days since we received updates,
> > and I update every day prior to the downtime; Surely that can't be
> > right, can it?
> >
>
> No updates available here, either on ftp.de.debian.org or
> ftp.uk.debian.org.

Indeed it must have been a narrow window -- I had tried about 5
minutes prior to my original post. Haven't seen anything since.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST(a)lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster(a)lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100402112458.GB9053(a)google.com
From: Stephen aka Fishpaste on
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 09:45:26AM -0400, Stephen Powell uttered:
> On Thu, 1 Apr 2010 03:50:22 -0400 (EDT), Anthony Campbell wrote:
> > On 31 Mar 2010, S.D.A. wrote:
> >> Speaking of this issue (FTP master being down); I did an 'aptitude
> >> update' for my SID laptop this morning. Says over 900 packages need to
> >> be updated! Now I know it's been a few days since we received updates,
> >> and I update every day prior to the downtime; Surely that can't be
> >> right, can it?
> >
> >
> > No updates available here, either on ftp.de.debian.org or
> > ftp.uk.debian.org.
>
> S.D.A:
>
> I am assuming that you canceled out of it and did not do the updates.
> If that is the case, try issuing the following commands:

Of course! 8)

> aptitude keep-all
> aptitude update
> aptitude full-upgrade
>
> and see what you get.

Thanks, I know my way around Aptitude. I was just querying about the
number of updates on a system that's updated daily. It seems that I
got in on a very brief window; maybe when some hardware was brought up
temporaily (who knows) and it's a false reading. Thought maybe that
testing had gone to stable, yadda, yadda.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST(a)lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster(a)lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100402112959.GC9053(a)google.com
From: Charles Kroeger on
>how long this nightmare might go on. Debian-announce may
>be a fine additional list, but why shall I subscribe

The last entry I have from l.debian.announce is:

"Debian GNU/Linux 5.0 updated"

that was on January 30, 2010

the nightmare continues.

--
C.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST(a)lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster(a)lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100402120332.1608d323(a)Mondo
From: Kumar Appaiah on
On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 12:03:32PM -0400, Charles Kroeger wrote:
> >how long this nightmare might go on. Debian-announce may
> >be a fine additional list, but why shall I subscribe
>
> The last entry I have from l.debian.announce is:
>
> "Debian GNU/Linux 5.0 updated"
>
> that was on January 30, 2010
>
> the nightmare continues.

This list is more appropriate:

http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2010/03/threads.html

Kumar
--
"...[Linux's] capacity to talk via any medium except smoke signals."
(By Dr. Greg Wettstein, Roger Maris Cancer Center)


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST(a)lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster(a)lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100402172415.GA1052(a)146653177.ece.utexas.edu
From: Sjoerd Hardeman on
Kumar Appaiah schreef:
> On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 12:03:32PM -0400, Charles Kroeger wrote:
>>> how long this nightmare might go on. Debian-announce may
>>> be a fine additional list, but why shall I subscribe
>> The last entry I have from l.debian.announce is:
>>
>> "Debian GNU/Linux 5.0 updated"
>>
>> that was on January 30, 2010
>>
>> the nightmare continues.
>
> This list is more appropriate:
>
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2010/03/threads.html
We know, first three responses to the OP were links to the announcement.
Yet then people wondered why there was no message sent to the user-list,
as users also depend on that server. Gradually, this continued to
wondering when the server will come online again.

Sjoerd