Prev: circumstantial evidence for Wegener but not for Darwin; what about Atom Totality? Chapt 2 #161; ATOM TOTALITY
Next: Dear Friend! I am a manager of Nigerian gold mine, and I have some cash I'd like to transfer out of Nigeria. Would you kindly provide me with your banking information? You'll be generously paid for your help.
From: Aiya-Oba on 14 Jun 2010 15:51 (11111111/0.000000001) x (2.846049908)^2 =mc2. -Aiya-Oba (Philosopher) Where mc2 (9x10^16), is Albert Einstein"s mass-energy equivalence equation. Such that; 1.1111111x10^16 x 8.100000081 =mc2 9x10^16 = mc2 Q E D. Eureka!
From: Dann Corbit on 14 Jun 2010 16:04 In article <2a385d53-3881-4f3b-a38a-4c65e3dc57d4 @b35g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>, aaiyaoba(a)rcc.mass.edu says... > > (11111111/0.000000001) x (2.846049908)^2 =mc2. -Aiya-Oba (Philosopher) > > Where mc2 (9x10^16), is Albert Einstein"s mass-energy equivalence > equation. > > Such that; > > 1.1111111x10^16 x 8.100000081 =mc2 > > 9x10^16 = mc2 > Q E D. The equation is not invariant with respect to mass. IOW, one KG of mass has less energy than one hundred KG of mass.
|
Pages: 1 Prev: circumstantial evidence for Wegener but not for Darwin; what about Atom Totality? Chapt 2 #161; ATOM TOTALITY Next: Dear Friend! I am a manager of Nigerian gold mine, and I have some cash I'd like to transfer out of Nigeria. Would you kindly provide me with your banking information? You'll be generously paid for your help. |