From: Woody on
James Taylor <usenet(a)oakseed.demon.co.uk.invalid> wrote:

> Woody wrote:
>
> > I have used VMWare server. It does mostly work but there is a good
> > reason it is free.
>
> Oh dear, that doesn't bode well.
>
> > For servers it is mostly ok. For use as a desktop it is sluggish to say
> > the least (ignoring its faffyness to run and set up).
>
> I can do without faffyness. Time is too short for much of that.

Well, I did get it set up and probably the additional problems I had
were becasue i had tomcat running, and it wanted to use that port so
just failed to run.
I didn't try it on linux, I put it on windows, where it failed to start
all the services it needed. It worked when I started them though

> immediate need for a VM platform is now so pressing that I will just
> have to put this machine into service in an insecure configuration on
> OSX, and worry about sorting out a Linux based system at a later date.

Makes sense

> It really would be a lot better if I could just find a way to disable
> the OSX network daemons (they're just not needed when VMware guests are
> bridged and have direct access to layer 2) or otherwise get the
> application firewall to work properly (which I expected to be easier).

Surely then you are just relying on the reliability of the firewall? I
never trusted software firewalls, I mean if you allow the network you
allow the network so you can fool the thing behind it

> Frankly I'm astonished that the much advertised new Leopard firewall

I obviously see different advertising than you as I have never seen an
advert for the firewall?

> doesn't actually work and there doesn't seem to be a big stink about it.
> Indeed most Mac users believe their platform is the most secure system
> in existence when in fact the exact opposite is true.

Its not a fact though. It may be true, or it may not be, but it isn't a
'fact'.

> Apple must be
> doing some kind of mass hypnosis to pull off this scale of deception.

Clearly that is the only possible answer, or maybe all mac users are
retards.



--
Woody
From: Richard Tobin on
In article <7rqq7mFltfU1(a)mid.individual.net>,
James Taylor <usenet(a)oakseed.demon.co.uk.invalid> wrote:

>But all the system daemons get access regardless, even the ones
>running as root! And then any non system process, or malware, can get
>access through the firewall just by piping through netcat or similar.

I don't follow this. Are you suggesting that some malware already
on your machine would run netcat? What would this gain it?

-- Richard
--
Please remember to mention me / in tapes you leave behind.
From: Ben Shimmin on
James Taylor <usenet(a)oakseed.demon.co.uk.invalid>:

[...]

> There is an increasing
> shortage of time pressing upon me with the work I'm doing,

It's amazing how much time you can save by the simple expedient of
posting to usenet less often.

b.

--
<bas(a)bas.me.uk> <URL:http://bas.me.uk/>
`It is like Swinburne sat down on his soul's darkest night and designed an
organized sport.'
-- David Foster Wallace, _Infinite Jest_, on American football
From: Woody on
Ben Shimmin <bas(a)llamaselector.com> wrote:

> James Taylor <usenet(a)oakseed.demon.co.uk.invalid>:
>
> [...]
>
> > There is an increasing
> > shortage of time pressing upon me with the work I'm doing,
>
> It's amazing how much time you can save by the simple expedient of
> posting to usenet less often.

Heritic.

--
Woody
From: D.M. Procida on
James Taylor <usenet(a)oakseed.demon.co.uk.invalid> wrote:

> D.M. Procida wrote:
>
> > I'm a little puzzled by your complaints. At the level you're speaking
> > of, you're presumably not dealing with anything especially to do with
> > Mac OS X; it's FreeBSD, isn't it?
>
> Well, I'm not sure. Is the launchd system and all the listening daemons
> I listed earlier part of FreeBSD, or are they part of OS X?
>
> > In which case, you should be able to make it do anything that you could
> > make FreeBSD do.
>
> Are you suggesting that I can install FreeBSD instead of OS X, or that
> by using MacPorts I might be able to install FreeBSD features such as a
> working application firewall, or some other approach?

I don't know enough about it to answer. But I'd be surprised if you
couldn't control the things you want to.

Daniele
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Prev: HyperCard, or something else
Next: HTML5 video on YouTube