From: Joe788 on 1 Feb 2010 15:48 On Jan 31, 7:29 pm, larryrozer <Larryro...(a)aol.com> wrote: > On Jan 31, 1:35 pm, Joe788 <larryro...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > >http://www.cahighspeedrail.ca.gov/gallery.aspx > > > What Arnold had to say back in 08: > > > "We have to move forward with this project." > > > "Our rail system in America is so old we are driving the same speed as > > we did a hundred years ago". > > > "We should do what other countries do. All over the world we see high > > speed rails that go 200 to 300 mph. We should do the same thing in > > this country." > > That was back in 08, times have changed. > > Take a look at the map you linked to, how much money do you think it > will take to build all of those high speed routes? > > The federal funds are but a in the bucket for these projects. > > For California's proposed high speed rail system alone they are > estimating it will cost $42.6 BILLION to build. If history repeats, > cost overruns will make it 2 to 10 times higher > > States are already bleeding red ink. Who's going to pick up the bill > when history repeats itself and these projects bleed red ink each year > as well? Banquer doesn't accept your reality. so he'll just copy/paste the same spam over and over, and then log in with his other alias so he can rate his posts with the prestigious "5 stars." Those "5 stars" mean people agree with him.....don't they??
From: Joe788 on 4 Feb 2010 07:23 http://www.cahighspeedrail.ca.gov/gallery.aspx What Arnold had to say back in 08: "We have to move forward with this project." "Our rail system in America is so old we are driving the same speed as we did a hundred years ago". "We should do what other countries do. All over the world we see high speed rails that go 200 to 300 mph. We should do the same thing in this country."
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 3 Prev: Qualcom tanks Next: Finished Modified Versa Cart And Testing Results |