From: Mike H on
Micky,

> If you recognize the following formula as the one suggested by you - check it

No I don't recognize that formula! I posted :-
=IF(OR(MOD(A1,400)=0,AND(MOD(A1,4)=0,MOD(A1,100)<>0)),366, 365)

You posted:-
=IF(OR(MOD(A1,400)=0,AND(MOD(A1,4)=0,MOD(A9,100)<>0)),366, 365)

Note the error in your formula referring to A1 & A9 and in the one in the
image you posted (A7 & A14) and hence the erronious results you are getting.

My formula returns 366 for 1908, 2008 & 2108 & 365 for year 2200 which isn't
a leap year by the following definition:-

A year will be a leap year if it is divisible by 4 but not by 100. If a year
is divisible by 4 and by 100, it is not a leap year unless it is also
divisible by 400.

Regards,

--
Mike

When competing hypotheses are otherwise equal, adopt the hypothesis that
introduces the fewest assumptions while still sufficiently answering the
question.


"מיכאל (מיקי) אבידן" wrote:

> If you recognize the following formula as the one suggested by you - check it
> against 1908, 2008, 2108 - it returns 365 instead of 366.
> =IF(OR(MOD(A1,400)=0,AND(MOD(A1,4)=0,MOD(A9,100)<>0)),366, 365)
> Here is how I chacked.
> http://img64.imageshack.us/img64/2067/nonameo.png
> Micky
>
>
> "Mike H" wrote:
>
> > Mickey,
> >
> > For clarification:-
> >
> > A leap year is every 4 years, but not every 100 years, then again every 400
> > years
> > --
> > Mike
> >
> > When competing hypotheses are otherwise equal, adopt the hypothesis that
> > introduces the fewest assumptions while still sufficiently answering the
> > question.
> >
> >
> > "Mike H" wrote:
> >
> > > Mickey,
> > >
> > > > Would you be so kind and check your suggested formula for the years:
> > > > 1908, 2008, 2108 and 2200(!)
> > >
> > > Of course
> > >
> > >
> > > 1908 = leap year
> > > 2008 = leap year
> > > 2108 - leap year
> > > 2200 - Not a leap year
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Mike
> > >
> > > When competing hypotheses are otherwise equal, adopt the hypothesis that
> > > introduces the fewest assumptions while still sufficiently answering the
> > > question.
> > >
> > >
> > > "מיכאל (מיקי) אבידן" wrote:
> > >
> > > > Mike,
> > > > Would you be so kind and check your suggested formula for the years:
> > > > 1908, 2008, 2108 and 2200(!)
> > > > Micky
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > "Mike H" wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Micky,
> > > > >
> > > > > I like the second formula, very neat, but I'm afraid the first gives errors,
> > > > > you would need to do this to get the correct result using MOD
> > > > >
> > > > > =IF(OR(MOD(A1,400)=0,AND(MOD(A1,4)=0,MOD(A1,100)<>0)),366, 365)
> > > > > --
> > > > > Mike
> > > > >
> > > > > When competing hypotheses are otherwise equal, adopt the hypothesis that
> > > > > introduces the fewest assumptions while still sufficiently answering the
> > > > > question.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > "מיכאל (מיקי) אבידן" wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > 1) =IF(MOD(A1,4)=0,366,365)
> > > > > > 2) =IF(ISNUMBER(--(A1&"/2/29")),366,365)
> > > > > > Micky
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "igbert" wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Is there a fuction to return the days in a given year?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Entry Return
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2008 366
> > > > > > > 2010 365
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Igbert
> > > > > > >
From: Mike H on
Micky.

I'm glad we resolved that.

--
Mike

When competing hypotheses are otherwise equal, adopt the hypothesis that
introduces the fewest assumptions while still sufficiently answering the
question.


"מיכאל (מיקי) אבידן" wrote:

> Sorry for the typo on my end...
> Anyhow - your formula can be a little bit shorter:
> =365+(--(MOD(A7,4)=0)*(MOD(A7,100)<>0)+(MOD(A7,400)=0)>0)
> and so can the one you liked:
> =365+ISNUMBER(--(A1&"/2/29"))
> Micky
>
>
> "Mike H" wrote:
>
> > Micky,
> >
> > > If you recognize the following formula as the one suggested by you - check it
> >
> > No I don't recognize that formula! I posted :-
> > =IF(OR(MOD(A1,400)=0,AND(MOD(A1,4)=0,MOD(A1,100)<>0)),366, 365)
> >
> > You posted:-
> > =IF(OR(MOD(A1,400)=0,AND(MOD(A1,4)=0,MOD(A9,100)<>0)),366, 365)
> >
> > Note the error in your formula referring to A1 & A9 and in the one in the
> > image you posted (A7 & A14) and hence the erronious results you are getting.
> >
> > My formula returns 366 for 1908, 2008 & 2108 & 365 for year 2200 which isn't
> > a leap year by the following definition:-
> >
> > A year will be a leap year if it is divisible by 4 but not by 100. If a year
> > is divisible by 4 and by 100, it is not a leap year unless it is also
> > divisible by 400.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > --
> > Mike
> >
> > When competing hypotheses are otherwise equal, adopt the hypothesis that
> > introduces the fewest assumptions while still sufficiently answering the
> > question.
> >
> >
> > "מיכאל (מיקי) אבידן" wrote:
> >
> > > If you recognize the following formula as the one suggested by you - check it
> > > against 1908, 2008, 2108 - it returns 365 instead of 366.
> > > =IF(OR(MOD(A1,400)=0,AND(MOD(A1,4)=0,MOD(A9,100)<>0)),366, 365)
> > > Here is how I chacked.
> > > http://img64.imageshack.us/img64/2067/nonameo.png
> > > Micky
> > >
> > >
> > > "Mike H" wrote:
> > >
> > > > Mickey,
> > > >
> > > > For clarification:-
> > > >
> > > > A leap year is every 4 years, but not every 100 years, then again every 400
> > > > years
> > > > --
> > > > Mike
> > > >
> > > > When competing hypotheses are otherwise equal, adopt the hypothesis that
> > > > introduces the fewest assumptions while still sufficiently answering the
> > > > question.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > "Mike H" wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Mickey,
> > > > >
> > > > > > Would you be so kind and check your suggested formula for the years:
> > > > > > 1908, 2008, 2108 and 2200(!)
> > > > >
> > > > > Of course
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > 1908 = leap year
> > > > > 2008 = leap year
> > > > > 2108 - leap year
> > > > > 2200 - Not a leap year
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Mike
> > > > >
> > > > > When competing hypotheses are otherwise equal, adopt the hypothesis that
> > > > > introduces the fewest assumptions while still sufficiently answering the
> > > > > question.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > "מיכאל (מיקי) אבידן" wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Mike,
> > > > > > Would you be so kind and check your suggested formula for the years:
> > > > > > 1908, 2008, 2108 and 2200(!)
> > > > > > Micky
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "Mike H" wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Micky,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I like the second formula, very neat, but I'm afraid the first gives errors,
> > > > > > > you would need to do this to get the correct result using MOD
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > =IF(OR(MOD(A1,400)=0,AND(MOD(A1,4)=0,MOD(A1,100)<>0)),366, 365)
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Mike
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > When competing hypotheses are otherwise equal, adopt the hypothesis that
> > > > > > > introduces the fewest assumptions while still sufficiently answering the
> > > > > > > question.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > "מיכאל (מיקי) אבידן" wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 1) =IF(MOD(A1,4)=0,366,365)
> > > > > > > > 2) =IF(ISNUMBER(--(A1&"/2/29")),366,365)
> > > > > > > > Micky
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > "igbert" wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Is there a fuction to return the days in a given year?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Entry Return
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > 2008 366
> > > > > > > > > 2010 365
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Igbert
> > > > > > > > >