Prev: $50,000 for KILLING FBI, CIA, NSA and NIS DIRECTORS
Next: does magnetic field have a honeycomb geometry? Chapt 11, Space is EM; magnet & iron filings Experiment #110; ATOM TOTALITY
From: Gerry Myerson on 26 May 2010 01:21 In article <4BFC5FB2.4030504(a)osu.edu>, James Burns <burns.87(a)osu.edu> wrote: <actually, James Burns didn't write what's below, he just left it in something he responded to, and I've mislaid the attribution, but never mind> > > I notice that Myerson himself has posted in this > > current thread. Yes, against my better judgement. > > Since we are discussing him, let me > > enlighten him on what we're talking about: Back in > > 2008, the mathematician Dennis DeTurck proposed > > that fractions be abolished. No, that's not at all what he proposed. > > Now quasi attacked > > DeTurck for making such a controversial idea, quasi called DeTurck a kook. > > then > > Myerson criticized quasi for the same. I criticized quasi for calling DeTurck a kook. I thought she could make her point without resorting to name-calling. > > The point > > that quasi was making back then (and I am now) is > > that Myerson judges proponents of mathematical > > ideas on their reputation and not just the > > mathematical content of their ideas. The point I was making then, and make now, is that I don't like to see people calling each other names on Usenet. I get enough of that at home. > > Of course, this was back in 2008. It's possible > > that the Myerson of 2010 would not judge posters > > the same way that he did back in 2008. If so, then > > more power to him. You must be referring to quasi, since DeTurck was not (to the best of my knowledge) a poster. I was generally favorably impressed with the mathematical content of quasi's ideas, and I wish she'd come back to this newsgroup. I judged her on what she wrote, and would again today. -- Gerry Myerson (gerry(a)maths.mq.edi.ai) (i -> u for email)
From: Gerry Myerson on 26 May 2010 19:10
In article <1361852314.226895.1274885818581.JavaMail.root(a)gallium.mathforum.org>, master1729 <tommy1729(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Gerry Myerson wrote : > > > (to the best of my knowledge) a poster. I was generally favorably > > impressed with the mathematical content of quasi's ideas, and I > > wish she'd come back to this newsgroup. I judged her on what she > > wrote, and would again today. > > she ?? > > quasi = she ? I'm giving quasi the benefit of the doubt. -- Gerry Myerson (gerry(a)maths.mq.edi.ai) (i -> u for email) |