Prev: Off-topic, not of general interest (was Re: for x,y > 7 twins(x+y) <= twins(x) + twins(y))
Next: Reference for a compactness theorem
From: Archimedes Plutonium on 26 May 2010 03:18


Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> (snipped)
> >
> > This Angle-of-Bending is going to be a very important parameter in
> > astronomy, for it
>
> Angle of Bending is a poor name for this arc. Let me call it a Slice
> of the Pie
> because given a slice of a pie, we can reconstruct the entire circle
> or ring.
>
> I am having a hard time in locating good enough pictures of the
> Perseus-Pisces
> supercluster and the Pavo-Indus supercluster. Here is a better picture
> than
> what Jarrett's mapping shows:

Sorry if in some of my posts I wrote Perseus-Indus supercluster when
I
meant Pavo-Indus.

>
> http://www.atlasoftheuniverse.com/nearsc.html
>
> http://www.atlasoftheuniverse.com/wnearsc.gif
>

In those websites it gives a distance measure of the diameter of some
of those
Voids as showing a scale of 100 million light years, which is terribly
inflated scale
since I am arguing that the upper limit of viewing and knowing any of
these
structures is 400 million light years, so one cannot have a smallish
void
with a diameter of 100 million light years. I think is exaggeration of
distance
is all due to the bogus and phony Hubble Law of Doppler redshift. If
we throw
out the Hubble Law with Doppler redshift, the scale of distances of
Void diameters
should be on the order of say 100 thousand light years.

> Now I cannot make out any Slice of Pie for any of the superclusters.
> They
> look sort of "straight" and not much curved.
>
> But I can make out easily the entire Pie, no need for a slice of pie,
> for the
> Voids.
>
> Where I approximate that Fornax Void = Columbia Void = Canes-Major
> Void
>
> And looking in the other hemisphere the Capricornus Void = Corona
> Borealis Void.
>
> With the Voids, one needs no slice of pie to make out the entire
> circle.
>
> So now, here I am having some conflict of interest. The Voids look
> like a
> honeycomb pattern, whereas I am looking for a magnetic field pattern
> of
> consecutive rings as bands of galaxies with alternating voids in
> between.
>
> Is there a honeycomb pattern in the magnetic field?
>

In the last few days I have been experimenting more than posting. I
tried to
design a 3rd dimensional magnet with iron filings to see whether I can
retrieve a Honeycomb pattern such as in those Voids listed. My
experimentation
was too crude to garner any results.

I did purchase a plastic box with a magnet and filings inside that can
do the
experiment far better than I was able to conduct with my crude
apparatus.

So in the next few days or come a week from now, I should have
results.
With the magnet and 2D on a sheet of paper, we can see the lines of
force
of the magnetic field. What we cannot see is whether a honeycomb
pattern
exists within those lines of force. So I need a 3D set up, and to try
to peer
into the 3D to see if a honeycomb structure exists in a magnetic
field.

Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: Off-topic, not of general interest (was Re: for x,y > 7 twins(x+y) <= twins(x) + twins(y))
Next: Reference for a compactness theorem