From: Dave Plowman (News) on 11 Dec 2008 04:01 In article <ps%%k.7268$W06.1819(a)flpi148.ffdc.sbc.com>, Mark D. Zacharias <nonsense(a)nonsense.net> wrote: > > Not a question of them working - but one of safety. > > > I don't really see them being any safer. Regular bananas have been > safely used for decades plus. I don't doubt that somewhere along the > line somebody probably sued somebody and this is why we now have those > ridiculous inverted bananas, but I won't accept them for normal > applications. I'd guess there are specs about touching a live pin with an object of a particular size. There are in the UK where mains plugs have the top part of the pins insulated to prevent this And of course the pin of a banana plug can be 'live' if not fully inserted and possibly touched. The usual answer to this is a shrouded banana plug - and this arrangement doesn't stop a plain one being used if you must. But means the device as supplied with its own test leads conforms to safety regs. Many inexperienced users will check mains circuits with a cheap DVM so it makes sense to prevent easily avoidable accidents. -- *If you must choose between two evils, pick the one you've never tried before Dave Plowman dave(a)davenoise.co.uk London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound.
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 Prev: NAvman f20 Satnav Power connector Next: Matsui LM19W1 (stuck in standby) |