From: 100% Original Musatov on
How do we regulate truth with numbers and what are the limits of
numbers to express truth?

Consider the origins of the universe to be an exponential Lewis
Carroll rabbit-hole into Einstein's ethereal description of expanding
space and suddenly a comparison of two single quantities against a
third does not quite seem to really express what we imagine
experiencing as vantage from the coveted seat of impartial observers
of life beyond the confines of limited time to convey what is really
happening around us, what has happened, what will happen.

A simplest fork of an afar equation in the form of a statement:

P versus NP

Bone chilling, indeed.

Let N equal 10. Let P equal 3 and the lesser p equal 9. It is actually
greater.

Let 3p/9 prove P equals 3 and p equals 9.
3N/P equals N proves N is ten.

Iff N equals 10
Let H equal 1 and
Let T equal 0.

Derive
N equals HT equals equals 0
From N equals 1*0 equals 0.

Enjoy the fireworks.

http://meami.org


From: glird on
On May 2, 12:12 pm, "100% Original Musatov" <marty.musa...(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
>Let 3p/9 prove P equals 3 and p equals 9.

Given 3p/9 and p = 9, then
3p/9 = 27/9 = 3.
That has nothing to do with P; which is not present in there.


>3N/P equals N proves N is ten.

IF a value is given for P, then 3N/P = N might or might not prove
that N = 10. Otherwise, as in the present case,
3N/P = N -> 3/P = N/N = 1
proves that P = 3 regardless of the value of N. If P = 3 and N = 10,
then
3N/P = N = 30/3 = N = 10
is correct. However, if P = 4, then
(3N/P) =/= (N = 10).

> Enjoy the fireworks.

Your bullshit is not fireworks.

From: porky_pig_jr on
On May 2, 12:12 pm, "100% Original Musatov" <marty.musa...(a)gmail.com>
wrote:

> P versus NP
>

To Pee versus To Not Pee, this is the question.

> Bone chilling, indeed.