OpenSolaris 2010.03
in [Solaris]
|
Prev: egrep and grep in Solaris
Next: Infiniband install
From: Fred on 6 Apr 2010 09:45 It's apparently running late: http://twitter.com/opensolaris
From: Ian Collins on 6 Apr 2010 16:41 On 04/ 7/10 12:36 AM, Richard B. Gilbert wrote: > Ian Collins wrote: >> On 04/ 6/10 11:34 PM, Michael Laajanen wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Any news on when 2010.03 will arrive, or has Oracle scapped it (: >> >> None yet, Oracle are doing a stunningly bad job at keeping the >> community up to date with progress. >> > > Very few companies give a "blow by blow" description of the progress of > a new release or even the production of a new car. There was more communication before previous releases. -- Ian Collins
From: Thommy M. on 8 Apr 2010 07:36 On 04/ 6/10 02:14 PM, Ian Collins wrote: > On 04/ 7/10 12:12 AM, Michael Laajanen wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Ian Collins wrote: >>> On 04/ 6/10 11:34 PM, Michael Laajanen wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Any news on when 2010.03 will arrive, or has Oracle scapped it (: >>> >>> None yet, Oracle are doing a stunningly bad job at keeping the >>> community up to date with progress. >>> >> They sure do (: >> >> What is on Solaris horizon, will we have a new update soon or will we >> see Solaris 11? > > I believe there will another update this year. OpenSolaris has a way to > go before it becomes Solaris next. You dont say... --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news(a)netfront.net ---
From: smyth_rj on 10 Apr 2010 03:07 On Apr 7, 5:41 am, Ian Collins <ian-n...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > On 04/ 7/10 12:36 AM, Richard B. Gilbert wrote: > > > Ian Collins wrote: > >> On 04/ 6/10 11:34 PM, Michael Laajanen wrote: > >>> Hi, > > >>> Any news on when 2010.03 will arrive, or has Oracle scapped it (: > > >> None yet, Oracle are doing a stunningly bad job at keeping the > >> community up to date with progress. > > > Very few companies give a "blow by blow" description of the progress of > > a new release or even the production of a new car. > > There was more communication before previous releases. > > -- > Ian Collins Hey, I am no foss guru but if Oracle is mucking the community about couldn't we just release ourselves? On a similar note, I presume there is a project group working to get osol fully independent from Oracle?
From: Michael Laajanen on 10 Apr 2010 16:19
>Hi, smyth_rj wrote: > On Apr 7, 5:41 am, Ian Collins <ian-n...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> On 04/ 7/10 12:36 AM, Richard B. Gilbert wrote: >> >>> Ian Collins wrote: >>>> On 04/ 6/10 11:34 PM, Michael Laajanen wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> Any news on when 2010.03 will arrive, or has Oracle scapped it (: >>>> None yet, Oracle are doing a stunningly bad job at keeping the >>>> community up to date with progress. >>> Very few companies give a "blow by blow" description of the progress of >>> a new release or even the production of a new car. >> There was more communication before previous releases. >> >> -- >> Ian Collins > > Hey, I am no foss guru but if Oracle is mucking the community about > couldn't we just release ourselves? > On a similar note, I presume there is a project group working to get > osol fully independent from Oracle? But release in my eyes means well tested, how are we supposed to do that, I think Sun does ALOT of regression testing that would be very hard to test ourself and possible also takes alot of servers to run! /michael |