Origins of the universe
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: GR prediction for precession of perihelion of Mercury is not quite right
Next: There is a time limit
From: BURT on 26 Jun 2010 20:03 On Jun 26, 4:53�pm, "David Hare-Scott" <sec...(a)nospam.com> wrote: > BURT wrote: > > On Jun 26, 3:48 pm, Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nos...(a)hotmail.com> > > wrote: > >> On 26 June, 21:15, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > >>> "I want to know how God created the universe. I want to know his > >>> thoughts. The rest are just details." Albert EInstein > > >>> Hypersphere cosmology was the beginning with energy created in its > >>> surface of space. First there was inflation that stopped gravity > >>> from bringing it all back together. Einstein's universe is closed > >>> finite yet unbounded hypersphere cosmology. > > >> don't drink and post > > > Einstein described the hypersphere cosmolgy as a closed universe > > finite yet unbounded. Hawking should have found that. > > > Mitch Raemsch > > You haven't the faintest idea what all this means do you? > > David- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - It means that time closes the universe. Mitch Raemsch
From: r norman on 26 Jun 2010 20:26 On Sat, 26 Jun 2010 17:03:46 -0700 (PDT), BURT <macromitch(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >On Jun 26, 4:53�pm, "David Hare-Scott" <sec...(a)nospam.com> wrote: >> BURT wrote: >> > On Jun 26, 3:48 pm, Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nos...(a)hotmail.com> >> > wrote: >> >> On 26 June, 21:15, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> >> >>> "I want to know how God created the universe. I want to know his >> >>> thoughts. The rest are just details." Albert EInstein >> >> >>> Hypersphere cosmology was the beginning with energy created in its >> >>> surface of space. First there was inflation that stopped gravity >> >>> from bringing it all back together. Einstein's universe is closed >> >>> finite yet unbounded hypersphere cosmology. >> >> >> don't drink and post >> >> > Einstein described the hypersphere cosmolgy as a closed universe >> > finite yet unbounded. Hawking should have found that. >> >> > Mitch Raemsch >> >> You haven't the faintest idea what all this means do you? >> > >It means that time closes the universe. > In other word, Burt is claiming that the set of all points not in the universe is open. Or else he might indicate that the universe contains all its limit points. But these are ideas are so far above his head that he will have absolutely no notion of what I am talking about. In this context it helps to know that the empty set is both open and closed, as is the complement of the empty set (more commonly known as 'the universe').
From: Michael Young on 26 Jun 2010 20:47 On Jun 26, 6:37 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > Einstein out used God? > No. When he said God he meant it. You say this because you want it to be true despite the many quotes we have from Einstein that say you're wrong. But you don't care about that. > Einstein was right and science had to judge him. You're an idiot. Science doesn't judge people. Science judges science. You wouldn't even KNOW about Einstein if science didn't "see" him as a huge contributor to "itself," so your comment is contradictory. > Soon science will know just how right Einstein was. Yeah? About what? God? Please. We've been over this. On Jun 26, 5:01 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On Jun 26, 1:43 pm, Will in New Haven > > > > <bill.re...(a)taylorandfrancis.com> wrote: > > On Jun 26, 4:15 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > "I want to know how God created the universe. I want to know his > > > thoughts. The rest are just details." Albert EInstein > > > You do know that Einstein repeatedly and explicitly denied any belief > > in a personal god or in any traditional religion, don't you? > Yes. But he still believed in a God. He clearly does not know, apparently. > God does not have to prove that He exists. Right, and we don't have to believe in him. If he wants to play hide and seek, that's fine. But if we look and can't find him, I'm going to assume he stopped playing and just ran away entirely. Or maybe he was never there. Also, the Invisible Matter Phasing Unicorns don't need to prove they stampede through our streets either, but when the Unholy Day of Horning comes and they run you through, you'll know I was right. On Jun 26, 4:15 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > Hypersphere cosmology was the beginning with energy created in its > surface of space. First there was inflation that stopped gravity from > bringing it all back together. Einstein's universe is closed finite > yet unbounded hypersphere cosmology. > > Mitch Raemsch Two possibilities: 1) you're pulling a JacobSmithian wordsalad regurgitation and you haven't the slightest damn clue what any of that means, or 2) you are incredibly terrible with the English language, like nando, and cannot ever use the correct terms when they apply to get a coherent thought across. Pick one. Personally, I think it's both. I'll take wagers though. Anyone want in?
From: BURT on 26 Jun 2010 20:57 On Jun 26, 5:47�pm, Michael Young <youngms...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Jun 26, 6:37 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > Einstein out used God? > > No. When he said God he meant it. > > You say this because you want it to be true despite the many quotes we > have from Einstein that say you're wrong. But you don't care about > that. > > > Einstein was right and science had to judge him. > > You're an idiot. Science doesn't judge people. Science judges science. > You wouldn't even KNOW about Einstein if science didn't "see" him as a > huge contributor to "itself," so your comment is contradictory. > > > Soon science will know just how right Einstein was. > > Yeah? About what? God? Please. We've been over this. > > On Jun 26, 5:01 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > On Jun 26, 1:43 pm, Will in New Haven > > > <bill.re...(a)taylorandfrancis.com> wrote: > > > On Jun 26, 4:15 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > "I want to know how God created the universe. I want to know his > > > > thoughts. The rest are just details." Albert EInstein > > > > You do know that Einstein repeatedly and explicitly denied any belief > > > in a personal god or in any traditional religion, don't you? > > Yes. But he still believed in a God. > > He clearly does not know, apparently. > > > God does not have to prove that He exists. > > Right, and we don't have to believe in him. If he wants to play hide > and seek, that's fine. But if we look and can't find him, I'm going to > assume he stopped playing and just ran away entirely. Or maybe he was > never there. > > Also, the Invisible Matter Phasing Unicorns don't need to prove they > stampede through our streets either, but when the Unholy Day of > Horning comes and they run you through, you'll know I was right. > > On Jun 26, 4:15 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > Hypersphere cosmology was the beginning with energy created in its > > surface of space. First there was inflation that stopped gravity from > > bringing it all back together. Einstein's universe is closed finite > > yet unbounded hypersphere cosmology. > > > Mitch Raemsch > > Two possibilities: 1) you're pulling a JacobSmithian wordsalad > regurgitation and you haven't the slightest damn clue what any of that > means, or 2) you are incredibly terrible with the English language, > like nando, and cannot ever use the correct terms when they apply to > get a coherent thought across. Pick one. Personally, I think it's > both. I'll take wagers though. Anyone want in? Light is traversing an ever growing circle of the hypersphere surface. Mitch Raemsch
From: David Hare-Scott on 26 Jun 2010 21:08
BURT wrote: > > Light is traversing an ever growing circle of the hypersphere surface. > > Mitch Raemsch Omnivorous regurgitators sleep furiously with mocked turtle soup. D |