Prev: [HACKERS] PG 9.1 tentative timeline
Next: [HACKERS] Proposal for 9.1: WAL streaming from WAL buffers
From: Robert Haas on 13 Jun 2010 12:03
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 1:45 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(a)gmx.net> wrote:
> On fre, 2010-06-11 at 08:15 -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
>> * Pr, Solaiyappan (NSN - IN/Bangalore) (solaiyappan.pr(a)nsn.com) wrote:
>> > I understand this is very early to ask this.. but, is there any tentative timeline has been planned / available for the PostgreSQL 9.1 release, like for the alpha or beta releases before the general release?
>>
>> The tentative timeline is "more-or-less the same as 9.0 went". �That is
>> to say, we're hopeful to start a commitfest July 15th, finish by Auguet
>> 15th, cut alpha1, then switch to GIT for the main repo, and start the
>> next commitfets September 15th.
>
> I wrote it down now:
> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_9.1_Development_Plan

Thanks! Looks good, except I thought our plan was to cut alpha1
before the git switch. Or maybe it doesn't matter? Not sure.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

From: Tom Lane on 13 Jun 2010 12:11
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(a)gmail.com> writes:
> On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 1:45 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(a)gmx.net> wrote:
>> I wrote it down now:
>> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_9.1_Development_Plan

> Thanks! Looks good, except I thought our plan was to cut alpha1
> before the git switch.

Yes, I thought so too. The page lists those events in the right order,
but now I see the associated dates don't agree.

regards, tom lane

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

From: Peter Eisentraut on 14 Jun 2010 12:20
On sön, 2010-06-13 at 12:11 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(a)gmail.com> writes:
> > On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 1:45 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(a)gmx.net> wrote:
> >> I wrote it down now:
> >> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_9.1_Development_Plan
>
> > Thanks! Looks good, except I thought our plan was to cut alpha1
> > before the git switch.
>
> Yes, I thought so too. The page lists those events in the right order,
> but now I see the associated dates don't agree.

Yeah, I just wrote down the facts. If the facts don't make sense, we
need to discuss changes.

I think it would make most sense to moved the Git switch to, say, August
21, which btw. is a Saturday.



--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2
Prev: [HACKERS] PG 9.1 tentative timeline
Next: [HACKERS] Proposal for 9.1: WAL streaming from WAL buffers