PG 9.1 tentative timeline
in [PgSql]
|
Prev: [HACKERS] PG 9.1 tentative timeline
Next: [HACKERS] Proposal for 9.1: WAL streaming from WAL buffers
From: Stephen Frost on 11 Jun 2010 08:15 * Pr, Solaiyappan (NSN - IN/Bangalore) (solaiyappan.pr(a)nsn.com) wrote: > I understand this is very early to ask this.. but, is there any tentative timeline has been planned / available for the PostgreSQL 9.1 release, like for the alpha or beta releases before the general release? The tentative timeline is "more-or-less the same as 9.0 went". That is to say, we're hopeful to start a commitfest July 15th, finish by Auguet 15th, cut alpha1, then switch to GIT for the main repo, and start the next commitfets September 15th. All that said, this was the discussion at PGCon a few weeks ago on the assumption we were going to get 9.0 out sometime in the July timeframe.. I'm slightly less optomistic about that at this particular time. :) > Also, is there any synchronous replication patch planned for the PostgreSQL 9.0 version? No. Sync-Rep didn't make it in for 9.0 and we're way, way, wayyyy past feature freeze on that. The hope/plan is to get it included in 9.1 (released "summer 2011", hopefully :). Thanks, Stephen
From: Devrim =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=DCND=DCZ?= on 11 Jun 2010 08:25 On Fri, 2010-06-11 at 19:56 +0800, Pr, Solaiyappan (NSN - IN/Bangalore) wrote: > Also, is there any synchronous replication patch planned for the > PostgreSQL 9.0 version? Cybertec announced new version of Cybercluster, which includes sync replication -- I haven't tested it though. -- Devrim GÃNDÃZ PostgreSQL DanıÅmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer PostgreSQL RPM Repository: http://yum.pgrpms.org Community: devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr http://www.gunduz.org Twitter: http://twitter.com/devrimgunduz
From: Stefan Kaltenbrunner on 11 Jun 2010 08:38 Devrim GÜNDÜZ wrote: > On Fri, 2010-06-11 at 19:56 +0800, Pr, Solaiyappan (NSN - IN/Bangalore) > wrote: >> Also, is there any synchronous replication patch planned for the >> PostgreSQL 9.0 version? > > Cybertec announced new version of Cybercluster, which includes sync > replication -- I haven't tested it though. that one is basically 9.0beta + the sync rep patch posted on the list - not something you would want to use in production... Stefan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
From: Andrea Suisani on 11 Jun 2010 08:35 On 06/11/2010 02:25 PM, Devrim GÜNDÜZ wrote: > On Fri, 2010-06-11 at 19:56 +0800, Pr, Solaiyappan (NSN - IN/Bangalore) > wrote: >> Also, is there any synchronous replication patch planned for the >> PostgreSQL 9.0 version? > > Cybertec announced new version of Cybercluster, which includes sync > replication -- I haven't tested it though. look at this thread for more info http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/b058e23346b050bd0fa2d3981af6da58.squirrel(a)internal.cybertec.at Andrea -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
From: Peter Eisentraut on 12 Jun 2010 01:45 On fre, 2010-06-11 at 08:15 -0400, Stephen Frost wrote: > * Pr, Solaiyappan (NSN - IN/Bangalore) (solaiyappan.pr(a)nsn.com) wrote: > > I understand this is very early to ask this.. but, is there any tentative timeline has been planned / available for the PostgreSQL 9.1 release, like for the alpha or beta releases before the general release? > > The tentative timeline is "more-or-less the same as 9.0 went". That is > to say, we're hopeful to start a commitfest July 15th, finish by Auguet > 15th, cut alpha1, then switch to GIT for the main repo, and start the > next commitfets September 15th. I wrote it down now: http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_9.1_Development_Plan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 Prev: [HACKERS] PG 9.1 tentative timeline Next: [HACKERS] Proposal for 9.1: WAL streaming from WAL buffers |