PNAC of course said it "wanted" the 9/11 attacks
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Delphi was Re: InfoPathwys was Re: 2D 3D was Re: AbandonSHP wasRe: Pop outs was Re: Cran Chops was Re: Positivity
Next: blackbody CMBR and why kelvin scale is special Chapt 3 #210; ATOM TOTALITY
From: * US on 29 Jun 2010 07:32 The "process of transformation" is clearly desired by the PNAC traitors. Obviously they believed it would take less time without the attacks of 9/11. On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 08:18:09 -0400, Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> wrote: >Iarnrod wrote: >> On Jun 23, 5:42 am, Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> wrote: >>> Iarnrod wrote: >>>> On Jun 22, 7:36 am, Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> wrote: >>>>> * US * wrote: > >>>>>> http://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf >>>>>> Their own words. > >>>>> Here's a direct quote: > >>>>> "Further, the process of transformation, even if it >>>>> brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long >>>>> one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event >>>>> like a new Pearl Harbor." > >>>>> After 9-11, the Bush regime referred to the 9-11 attacks as >>>>> a new Pearl Harbor, an opportunity, and a win. And of course >>>>> the plans to bomb and terrorize the People of Afghanistan were >>>>> on Bush's desk prior to 9-11-01. The Bush regime and its cronies >>>>> in the oil/weapons business have benefited immensely from the >>>>> 9-11 tragedy, while the rest of the world has suffered. This >>>>> begs the question, do nut jobs like ironhead lie about 9-11 due >>>>> to its hate for freedom, truth, justice, and America, or due to >>>>> its extreme ignorance and stupidity? Either way, thanks for doing >>>>> your part to expose ironhead's lies. > >>>> Thank you, Hankie > >>> No, thank *you*, ironhead.... <g> > >> You "thank" me for pointing out that you yourself provided the PROOF >> POSITIVE > > Actually, US posted the link, but since I knew you wouldn't be >able to find it, I quoted the comment proving that the authors >of PNAC wanted a new Pearl Harbor type attack against the United >States. > I'm thanking you for repeatedly and convincingly demonstrating >that pretty much everything you write is a lie, and that you're >insane. Thanks again... <chuckle> That's the bushkultie's best excuse for worshipping war criminals. He can't even seem to learn how to read for comprehension. His neocon masters count on that. See "Dunning-Kruger Effect". http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/06/24/the-anosognosics-dilemma-somethings-wrong-but-youll-never-know-what-it-is-part-5/ It's why the bushworshipper doesn't realize that he can't read for comprehension. |