PROOF: LHC MORE Energy than Cosmic Ray Collisions
in [Relativity]
|
From: guskz on 21 Jun 2010 03:00 Europe's LHC proton collider is ****LYING*** when they compare their collisions with Cosmic Ray collisions. PROOF that LHC collisions are much higher energies than ANY Cosmic Ray collisions with the atmosphere. #1. Even "if" Space cosmic rays carry 10^20 eV that is NOT what they produce when they collide with the atmosphere. FOR
From: guskz on 21 Jun 2010 04:05 On Jun 21, 3:14 am, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > Here is PROOF that Europe's LHC proton collider is ***LYING*** when > they compare the probability of creating a black hole to cosmic ray > collisions: > > Even if cosmic rays carry 10^20 eV, when they collide with the > atmosphere which is a fixed target, the energy produced is: > > #1) E= Square_root_of (10^20) = 10^10 eV > > WHERE AS the collision between two moving targets as in LHC proton > collider is: > > #2) E= E1 + E2 = 10^12 eV > > #2 is 100 fold higher than #1 and therefore more LIKELY than cosmic > rays to produce a BLACK HOLE that destroys the Earth. > > Equations at LHC's own web pages: > > http://www.lhc-closer.es/php/index.php?i=1&s=4&p=3&e=0 > > -------------------- > > What is "truly" terrible, is those that said Cosmic Rays were more > likely to produce black holes than LHC. > > Yet they are shown they were wrong, but they still argue and claim to > know more than THEIR MASTER. > > 2010: Before Einstein, GUSKZ And then 14 TeV will be 10^13 which is 1000 times greater than a cosmic ray collision.
From: guskz on 21 Jun 2010 15:37 On Jun 21, 11:00 am, Uncle Al <Uncle...(a)hate.spam.net> wrote: > -- > Uncle Alhttp://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/ TROLL Oppose the words written "if you can", or TROLL AWAY.
From: PD on 21 Jun 2010 18:10 On Jun 21, 2:14 am, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > Here is PROOF that Europe's LHC proton collider is ***LYING*** when > they compare the probability of creating a black hole to cosmic ray > collisions: > > Even if cosmic rays carry 10^20 eV, when they collide with the > atmosphere which is a fixed target, the energy produced is: > > #1) E= Square_root_of (10^20) = 10^10 eV Math error. The equation is sqrt(2 * m_n * E_cr). You'll see it in the very page you reference. This is sqrt (2 * 10^9 * 10^20) eV = sqrt(20*10^28) = 4.5*10^14, which is 450 times a TeV. > > WHERE AS the collision between two moving targets as in LHC proton > collider is: > > #2) E= E1 + E2 = 10^12 eV > > #2 is 100 fold higher than #1 and therefore more LIKELY than cosmic > rays to produce a BLACK HOLE that destroys the Earth. > > Equations at LHC's own web pages: > > http://www.lhc-closer.es/php/index.php?i=1&s=4&p=3&e=0 Yes, you'll note in the page that you reference that the energy of the proton in a fixed-target collision would have to be 10^17 eV to be equivalent to the energies at LHC. But cosmic ray protons can be a 1000 times larger energy. Try again. > > -------------------- > > What is "truly" terrible, is those that said Cosmic Rays were more > likely to produce black holes than LHC. > > Yet they are shown they were wrong, but they still argue and claim to > know more than THEIR MASTER. > > 2010: Before Einstein, GUSKZ
From: funkenstein on 23 Jun 2010 10:17 On Jun 22, 12:10 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Jun 21, 2:14 am, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > Here is PROOF that Europe's LHC proton collider is ***LYING*** when > > they compare the probability of creating a black hole to cosmic ray > > collisions: > > > Even if cosmic rays carry 10^20 eV, when they collide with the > > atmosphere which is a fixed target, the energy produced is: > > > #1) E= Square_root_of (10^20) = 10^10 eV > > Math error. > The equation is sqrt(2 * m_n * E_cr). You'll see it in the very page > you reference. > This is sqrt (2 * 10^9 * 10^20) eV = sqrt(20*10^28) = 4.5*10^14, which > is 450 times a TeV. > > > > > WHERE AS the collision between two moving targets as in LHC proton > > collider is: > > > #2) E= E1 + E2 = 10^12 eV > > > #2 is 100 fold higher than #1 and therefore more LIKELY than cosmic > > rays to produce a BLACK HOLE that destroys the Earth. > > > Equations at LHC's own web pages: > > >http://www.lhc-closer.es/php/index.php?i=1&s=4&p=3&e=0 > > Yes, you'll note in the page that you reference that the energy of the > proton in a fixed-target collision would have to be 10^17 eV to be > equivalent to the energies at LHC. But cosmic ray protons can be a > 1000 times larger energy. > > Try again. > > Thanks for your response.. I had had no idea what the OP was about.
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 Prev: Lying for Einstein Next: PROOF: LHC MORE Energy than Cosmic Ray Collisions |