Prev: shell
Next: Photo software suitable for multiple users
From: Chris Malcolm on 4 Mar 2010 10:33
In rec.photo.digital stephe_k(a)yahoo.com <stephe_k(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> RichA wrote:
>> On Mar 3, 1:17 am, "steph...(a)yahoo.com" <steph...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> nospam wrote:
>>>> In article
>>>> <41df2b0e-03ee-4ea1-b60d-6de84dd99...(a)f8g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>,
>>>> RichA <rander3...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Better in terms of image quality. Read what the owners say in the
>>>>> Pentax forum on Dpreview.
>>>> that doesn't mean anything. owners of every camera think their choice
>>>> is the best, otherwise they wouldn't have bought it.
>>> Nice one. Maybe one day people will figure this out. :-)
>>
>> Sometimes true, in this case, wrong. A few of them own the K7 and the
>> K-X and find the K-X to be better. That's why they wish the K7 had
>> the K-X sensor. Get it?

> A few <> "the owners", Get it??

> Plus I would venture to guess people who own both are techno-geek pixel
> peepers who couldn't take a worthwhile photograph if their life depended
> on it. In a normal size useful print I highly doubt you can see any
> difference in the two.

Is there something about Pentax that tells you none of them will be
non-techno-geeks but simply good photographers who sometimes produce
abnormally large prints for exhibitions etc.?

--
Chris Malcolm
First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5
Prev: shell
Next: Photo software suitable for multiple users