Perfectly safe science-fiction, earth heated from outside in?
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Animation of higher-dim rotation
Next: Hey, Arindam, did you see this?..... ##### Re: Why do we feel aroused when two ideas contradict each other?
From: JT on 8 Apr 2010 17:08 On 8 Apr, 22:58, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On 4/8/10 1:15 PM, JT wrote: > > > Is it possible to precalculate the real position of Aldebaran as by > > 9/12 2009? > > > JT > > Angular position with respect to whom? Well you would have to precalculate the position relative Trondheim Norway i guess, many photos videos are from there. JT
From: Sam Wormley on 8 Apr 2010 17:25 On 4/8/10 4:06 PM, JT wrote: > On 8 Apr, 22:57, Sam Wormley<sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> On 4/8/10 12:10 PM, JT wrote: >> >>> Another guess the phenomen mentioned is Betelguese going Nova. >> >> You do know how ridiculous that statements is! > > No would you care to explain. > > JT Check out the difference between Nova an Supernova, Jonas!
From: Sam Wormley on 8 Apr 2010 17:31 On 4/8/10 4:08 PM, JT wrote: > On 8 Apr, 22:58, Sam Wormley<sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> On 4/8/10 1:15 PM, JT wrote: >> >>> Is it possible to precalculate the real position of Aldebaran as by >>> 9/12 2009? >> >>> JT >> >> Angular position with respect to whom? > > Well you would have to precalculate the position relative Trondheim > Norway i guess, many photos videos are from there. > > JT Given time, date and location and elevation, with corrections for proper motion, refraction, aberration, nutation, etc., even an amateur can get the coordinated to a few hundred milliarc seconds.
From: JT on 8 Apr 2010 18:04 On 8 Apr, 23:25, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On 4/8/10 4:06 PM, JT wrote: > > > On 8 Apr, 22:57, Sam Wormley<sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 4/8/10 12:10 PM, JT wrote: > > >>> Another guess the phenomen mentioned is Betelguese going Nova. > > >> You do know how ridiculous that statements is! > > > No would you care to explain. > > > JT > > Check out the difference between Nova an Supernova, Jonas! Ok it did go supernova and exploded, is it still ridiculous? Afterall it would take 600 years before we see the bang pretty much now. Somehow the electromagnetic field from something explodes may just vanish instantly, is is no photons, electrons or particles. Just a field and the spiral show how the field collapse on our side. Pure speculation on my part, but it is pretty obvious these phenomen been notice throughout history without anyone claiming any celestial body involved. My guess is it is due to propagation delays of light, the collapsing field is instant on both sides. I speculate that the Norweigan spiral is a supernova ***live***. And if i am correct it would be a piece of cake for todays astronoms to find out which object, and what time it will take until we can watch the Nova for real explode on our skies. But many years before the Norweigan supernova show up we will probably see Betelguese go Nova, i say 2015 since i happen to like the movie back to the future. It seem like we live in old regions of Andromeda galaxy. JT
From: Sam Wormley on 8 Apr 2010 20:10
On 4/8/10 5:04 PM, JT wrote: > On 8 Apr, 23:25, Sam Wormley<sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> On 4/8/10 4:06 PM, JT wrote: >> >>> On 8 Apr, 22:57, Sam Wormley<sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On 4/8/10 12:10 PM, JT wrote: >> >>>>> Another guess the phenomen mentioned is Betelguese going Nova. >> >>>> You do know how ridiculous that statements is! >> >>> No would you care to explain. >> >>> JT >> >> Check out the difference between Nova an Supernova, Jonas! > > Ok it did go supernova and exploded, is it still ridiculous? [...] > > But many years before the Norweigan supernova show up we will probably > see Betelguese go Nova, i say 2015 since i happen to like the movie > back to the future. > You have difficulty learning what a nova is, don't you? |