Prev: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, May 14, 2010 Washington,DC
Next: doppler redshift is filled with error in measuring Chapt 3, Fiberglass Experiment; Refraction Redshift, not a Doppler #88; ATOM TOTALITY
From: Archimedes Plutonium on 15 May 2010 13:37


Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Now according to Jarrett's website:
>
> --- quoting ---
> http://spider.ipac.caltech.edu/staff/jarrett/papers/LSS/


(big snip)


>
> Now there are other predictions of the Orchard Visibility Problem, but
> I have
> to work on them.
>

I do not know if Jarrett would agree with me on this, but I sense that
the
P-P Supercluster is the central or anchor structure of all his
mappings.
This is the Perseus-Pisces Supercluster.

Now I maybe incorrect by saying that this structure is the longest and
narrowing
out structure of all the structures? By narrowing out I mean that
unlike any
other structure, it is the longest structure as a filament or tube and
where at
one end it is wider than at the other end. And that the narrowing is a
measured
mathematically consistent narrowing. The Great Walls on the other hand
are
like "bands" and not narrowing filaments.

Now I bring this concern up, because in the Orchard Visibility
Problems of
Probability theory in Mathematics, the last visible geometry is a long
filament,
hose like view where it narrows from a wide end to a narrowest end.

In other words, the P-P Supercluster is the last viewing of the
orchard trees.

And the Orchard Visibility Problem of Math also would allow us to
determine
definitively whether Space is Euclidean flat or whether Space is
Elliptic or
even Hyperbolic. The Orchard Visibility Problem predicts a long
narrowing
tube or filament structure as the last viewing structure of the Upper
Limit
of Viewing. This upper limit is seen as a RING or overall as a sphere
and that
is what happens when we include all the superstructures and quasars.

If the Cosmos were Euclidean or Hyperbolic, the Orchard Viewing would
not form a long filament string or hose which is wide at one end and
narrows at the other end. If Euclidean then it is difficult to see any
such
filament because it would be in the line-of-sight that a filament
formed and
the Upper Limit would be vastly more extended in Euclidean rather than
in Elliptic. The formation of filaments like the P-P, at such a
smaller distance
such as 400 million light years away is a trademark of Elliptic
geometry.
Hyperbolic geometry would be the darkest and least forming of
superstructures.

I get the feeling that Jarrett subconsciously recognizes the
overriding importance
of the P-P Superstructure as a entity that is key to understanding the
entire
Cosmic mapping. I say this because, apparently, Jarrett often mentions
the
P-P. The importance of the P-P is that it is the clearest view of the
end of the
Orchard Visibility Problem, for it is the last view of the trees in
which you cannot
see any further beyond. And, keep in mind that all the structures
beyond the
3rd layer where the P-P lies, are not beyond the 3rd layer but are
closer to earth
than the P-P superstructure.

When I was in High School in the late 1960s, I had learned that the
way to
tell if the Cosmos was Euclidean, Elliptic, Hyperbolic was to find a
large enough
Cosmic triangle and see if the summation of angles was equal to,
greater than,
or less than 180 degrees, respectively. But here today, using
probability theory
of Orchard Visibility and knowing the data of the P-P Superstructure,
that we
live in a Elliptic geometry Universe.


Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, May 14, 2010 Washington,DC
Next: doppler redshift is filled with error in measuring Chapt 3, Fiberglass Experiment; Refraction Redshift, not a Doppler #88; ATOM TOTALITY