From: dadiOH on 28 Feb 2010 15:21 Bear Bottoms wrote: > "David H. Lipman" <DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net> wrote in > news:hmedvf02kib(a)news3.newsguy.com: > >> From: "Bear Bottoms" <bearbottoms1(a)gmai.com> >> >>>>> The dissertation is being conducted under the auspices of the >>>>> University of Maryland, Baltimore County. >> >>>> I suggest anybody doing this deliberately falsify all data to skew >>>> the research and phuck his data for spamming Usenet. >> >> >>> I disagree. His survey is benign and genuine. >> >> Doesn't matter now anyway. >> Once I added that statement the correctness of the data is in doubt >> and so are any conclusions that can be drawn from them :-) >> >> > > You should be proud of yourself. He intended no harm. The spam > argument is not applicable, disingenuous, and mean. For once, I agree with you. -- dadiOH ____________________________ dadiOH's dandies v3.06... ....a help file of info about MP3s, recording from LP/cassette and tips & tricks on this and that. Get it at http://mysite.verizon.net/xico
From: HeyBub on 28 Feb 2010 21:02 Bear Bottoms wrote: > "David H. Lipman" <DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net> wrote in > news:hme3kj02e7q(a)news3.newsguy.com: > >> From: "schmed12" <schmed12(a)yahoo.com> >> >>> The dissertation is being conducted under the auspices of the >>> University of Maryland, Baltimore County. >> >> I suggest anybody doing this deliberately falsify all data to skew >> the research and phuck his data for spamming Usenet. >> > > I disagree. His survey is benign and genuine. No it's not. ANY survey where the participants self-select is specious. He is evidently majoring in cello or metal sculpting.
From: Caesar Romano on 1 Mar 2010 08:08 On Sun, 28 Feb 2010 20:02:56 -0600, "HeyBub" <heybub(a)NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote Re Re: PhD Student needs survey completed to finish my research: >> I disagree. His survey is benign and genuine. > >No it's not. > >ANY survey where the participants self-select is specious. Unless it is intended to be a survey of a self-selected population. -- Work is the curse of the drinking class.
From: ftr on 2 Mar 2010 18:29 On 28/02/2010 20:00, David H. Lipman wrote: > From: "Bear Bottoms"<bearbottoms1(a)gmai.com> > > | You should be proud of yourself. He intended no harm. The spam argument > | is not applicable, disingenuous, and mean. However, I'm sure he is smart > | enough to filter out any garbage you might have generated. > > No different from any other so-called survey or telemarketing gimmick. > It certainly wasn't On Topic nor solicited content and there isn't any way to ferret the > data for correctness. > > If he was truly smart he wouldn't have spammed that message as well as he'd know that the > data collection process is flawed. > He did not spam at all but politely invited us for help to finish his thesis. This is an enterprise that everyone on the list should support.
From: LouB on 2 Mar 2010 20:58 ftr wrote: > On 28/02/2010 20:00, David H. Lipman wrote: >> From: "Bear Bottoms"<bearbottoms1(a)gmai.com> >> >> | You should be proud of yourself. He intended no harm. The spam argument >> | is not applicable, disingenuous, and mean. However, I'm sure he is >> smart >> | enough to filter out any garbage you might have generated. >> >> No different from any other so-called survey or telemarketing gimmick. >> It certainly wasn't On Topic nor solicited content and there isn't any >> way to ferret the >> data for correctness. >> >> If he was truly smart he wouldn't have spammed that message as well as >> he'd know that the >> data collection process is flawed. >> > > He did not spam at all but politely invited us for help to finish his > thesis. > > This is an enterprise that everyone on the list should support. Original message with a link?
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 Prev: alt.comp.freeware links at Sun Feb 28 21:20:02 2010 Next: software raid |