Physics

Calculation of Soldner
German mathematician Zoldner has settled an invoice for a deviation of a ray of light in the field of the Sun for corpuscular light. It has appeared in 2 times less observed. I consider that Soldner has counted incorrectly and the result should be in 4 times more. To whom it is interesting, I can show an error of ... 25 Jul 2010 07:36

Harry Reid says climate legislation shelved for this session.
On Jul 24, 9:32 am, "kdth...(a)yahoo.com" <kdth...(a)earthlink.net> wrote: The quantity produced by the rising rate of China would be 1/2 this or the 1/2, therefore the quantity for US rate of 1 decade. This combined quantity therefore would be 3 times that of 1 decade in 2 decades. 3 x 2 = 6 Squa... 9 Aug 2010 09:01

See how Time Inc. controls your brain <sic>
"Tom Potter" <xprivatnews(a)mailinator.com> wrote in message news:4c4a91ab$1(a)news.x-privat.org... If you do a Time <snip> gun group numb nuts ... 26 Jul 2010 17:10

Lwalk or Mr. Transfer P becoming the third human to do the only valid correct Indirect Euclid IP #4.14 Correcting Math
Transfer Principle wrote: So AP is asking me to settle the dispute between himself and the anonymous poster (on Google, he appears only via the email address sttscitrans(a)tesco.net) regarding Euclid's infinitude of primes proof. No, I was not asking that at all. I was asking you to acknowledge a ... 24 Jul 2010 17:45

where is the factorial value 1/2 of the exponent value in 10^500 #4.13 Correcting Math
Transfer Principle wrote: solve 2x = log(x!) for x and then clicked on "use the base 10 logarithm." Though Wolfram returns the trivial value x = 0, there is a graph, and one can roll the mouse over the non-trivial solution: (268.087, 536.175) Thus, we find that 268! is approximately 10^... 24 Jul 2010 02:42

valid Indirect Euclid IP leads to twin prime proof #4.12 Correcting Math
Transfer Principle wrote: On Jul 23, 1:00 pm, Archimedes Plutonium (snipped) This is not quite being fair to me Lwalk. I deliver an entire proof, one which can be published in a book. I deliver both Direct and Indirect in long form and in short form: short form Indirect (1) definition of prime number (2... 24 Jul 2010 02:42

Quantum Gravity 403.6: Another "Negative Probability" Indication: P(A-->B) vs P(B-->A) with the latter as P(A<--B)
From Osher Doctorow I pointed out that although P(A<--B) and P(A-->B) respectively represent the probabilities of Repulsion and Attraction or Expansion and Contraction respectively, there are also other contextual factors including stabilizing versus destabilizing structures that relate to the above. Another ... 23 Jul 2010 18:02

Artificial Reflective Duckweed for Swimming Pools
This would certainly be the cheapest way to get the pool temperature down a few degrees. The "duckweed" must be something like cheap mylar plastic disks that spread out by themselves with very little clumping. Maybe surface or magnetic effects + slight wave action will work. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lemna... 23 Jul 2010 20:14

Quantum Gravity 403.5: A Step Beyond Feynman: +/- Probability for Expansion vs Contraction
From Osher Doctorow If every object in the Universe has an intrinsic ability to expand or contract (repel or attract), although modified by a tendency to preserve at least non-"disruptive" structures, then consider the following: 1) P(A --> B) = 1 + P(AB) - P(A) (probability of repulsion or expansion) 2)... 23 Jul 2010 16:56

Lwalk or Mr. Transfer P becoming the third human to do the only valid correct Indirect Euclid IP #4.10 Correcting Math
Archimedes Plutonium wrote: Transfer Principle wrote: I notice that both JSH and AP are working on the Infinitude of Twin Primes, but via different methods. JSH is looking at congruences mod various primes, while AP is attempting to modify Euclid's proof so that it works for Twin Primes. ... 24 Jul 2010 04:49