First
|
Prev |
Next
|
Last
Pages: 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195
EIT seen in single atoms, real and artificial Single atoms go transparent EIT seen in single atoms, real and artificial http://physicsworld.com/cws/m/1711/17632/article/news/42385 "Making an opaque material transparent might seem like magic. But for well over a decade, physicists have been able to do just that in atomic gases using the phenomenon of elect... 23 Apr 2010 21:32
Quantum Gravity 365.8: Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle is a "Coincidence" From Osher Doctorow Chris Isham of the U.K. (Oxford U. or Cambridge U., I forget which) in a paper today in arXiv continues the usual U.K. Loop Quantum Gravity/ Penrose attempts to destroy Probability, this time via Topos theory, to such a degree that I am reconsidering whether to consider the U.K. as an over-bu... 23 Apr 2010 21:32
Perhaps added rest mass keeps photons moving at c and only c. Rest·Mass is “spun up” photons, apparently. For example, when gamma ray “photon jets” collide, they form electron·positron pairs. Likewise, a blue·shifted ( spun up ) photon might gain rest mass... but it's undetectable, so far. Perhaps added rest mass keeps photons moving at c and only c. ... 23 Apr 2010 18:06
Electron’s puzzles. On 4/21/10 1:14 PM, john wrote: Suns are matter factories. Stars convert matter to energy. Conservation laws hold. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stellar_evolution ... 28 May 2010 23:36
Stardust in the Solar Wind All our sadness, all our sin, Is stardust in the solar wind. Kansas... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1qxSwJC3Ly0 More Kansas... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CB17uWuBrL0 "We're not in Kansas anymore, Toto"... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9pS5xzOWbwo So be happy, so begin To understand that dusty... 23 Apr 2010 18:04
does the blueshift support the Atom Totality more than the Big Bang? #15; ATOM TOTALITY (Atom Universe) theory; replaces Big Bang theory Blueshift is not an easy topic to find out information. Anyway, let me summarize the types of redshift commonly bantered about. There are three such types: (a) Doppler redshift -- relative motion or speeding away of two objects, causing an elongation of the wavelength (b) Cosmological redshift-- due to expansi... 23 Apr 2010 18:04
“Dark Flow” isn't “statistically significant”. Quoting ARXIV.ORG: “ We revisit the statistical significance of the "dark flow" presented in Kashlinsky et al. (2009). We do not find a statistically significant detection of a bulk flow. Instead we find that CMB correlations between the 8 WMAP channels used in this analysis decrease the infe... 23 Apr 2010 21:32
Albert Einstein didn't accept black holes or the idea of totally collapsed stars PD (thedraperfamily(a)gmail.com) writes: On Apr 21, 9:35=A0pm, xxein <xx...(a)comcast.net> wrote: On Apr 21, 5:25=A0pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: On Apr 21, 4:19=A0pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: On Apr 21, 3:57=A0pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: GR... 23 Apr 2010 18:03
Climategate and The Crisis Of Climate Alarmism http://www.thegwpf.org/climategate/854-clmategate-and-the-crisis-of-climate-alarmism.html Thursday, 22 April 2010 09:35 Richard S Lindzen In mid-November of 2009 there appeared a file on the Internet containing thousands of emails and other documents from the Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Angl... 28 Apr 2010 08:21
Can we detect a blueshift of �c? Brad Guth wrote: In other words, you don't know: "Can we detect a blueshift of �c?" Redshift is obviously mainstream approved, but blueshift isn't? Silly. Both are simply the result of the standard physics of Doppler Shift. Obviously we can't seem to detect 100% redshift of c, so I'd doubt -c ... 28 Apr 2010 17:28 |