Prev: Review sites DESPERATE for SOMETHING to test
Next: Amazon and Apple, two vile companies probed for price fixing
From: Nervous Nick on 2 Aug 2010 21:21 On Aug 2, 6:43 pm, Larry Thong <larry_th...(a)shitstring.com> wrote: > Baboons do it in the zoo, they even do it in the wild. It must be a fun > activity as it seems to be spreading. > > <http://i298.photobucket.com/albums/mm261/Ritaberk/Lice.jpg> Why did you choose to share this photo? Were you jonesing for a reason to use a double exclamation point?
From: SneakyP on 3 Aug 2010 00:49 Nervous Nick <nervous.nick(a)gmail.com> wrote in news:d9e7839f-2682-4eaf-bab0-fad5f2f66c2d(a)g19g2000yqc.googlegroups.com: > On Aug 2, 6:43�pm, Larry Thong <larry_th...(a)shitstring.com> wrote: >> Baboons do it in the zoo, they even do it in the wild. �It must be a >> fu > n >> activity as it seems to be spreading. >> >> <http://i298.photobucket.com/albums/mm261/Ritaberk/Lice.jpg> > > Why did you choose to share this photo? Were you jonesing for a > reason to use a double exclamation point? > Awhile back, I thought too that Ms. Thing was competing for acceptance by groveling envy out of her peers of photographers (who don't have the equipment she has). At the same time, another poster was posting about their preferred equipment and figured it was some kind of war of the cameras between them. It's been better to look at these posts from another view that they actually say what shots could be had with the equipment being demonstrated. Nothing more or less. Considered the second option and found a different perspective. Besides, this is a photography group so what else was I to think should be on a rec.photo.digital froup? Shame on me. -- SneakyP To email me, you know what to do.
From: George Kerby on 3 Aug 2010 11:13 On 8/2/10 8:21 PM, in article d9e7839f-2682-4eaf-bab0-fad5f2f66c2d(a)g19g2000yqc.googlegroups.com, "Nervous Nick" <nervous.nick(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Aug 2, 6:43�pm, Larry Thong <larry_th...(a)shitstring.com> wrote: >> Baboons do it in the zoo, they even do it in the wild. �It must be a fun >> activity as it seems to be spreading. >> >> <http://i298.photobucket.com/albums/mm261/Ritaberk/Lice.jpg> > > Why did you choose to share this photo? Were you jonesing for a > reason to use a double exclamation point? Just when we thought Rita was gaining control of the medications, he veers off again. Oh well...
From: Savageduck on 3 Aug 2010 11:21 On 2010-08-03 08:13:13 -0700, George Kerby <ghost_topper(a)hotmail.com> said: > > > > On 8/2/10 8:21 PM, in article > d9e7839f-2682-4eaf-bab0-fad5f2f66c2d(a)g19g2000yqc.googlegroups.com, "Nervous > Nick" <nervous.nick(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Aug 2, 6:43�pm, Larry Thong <larry_th...(a)shitstring.com> wrote: >>> Baboons do it in the zoo, they even do it in the wild. �It must be a fun >>> activity as it seems to be spreading. >>> >>> <http://i298.photobucket.com/albums/mm261/Ritaberk/Lice.jpg> >> >> Why did you choose to share this photo? Were you jonesing for a >> reason to use a double exclamation point? > > Just when we thought Rita was gaining control of the medications, he veers > off again. Oh well... ....but all things considered it is not a bad candid capture, clearly demonstrating just how good the 70-200 f/2.8 can be. The baiting, tongue in cheek subject lines continue to be a groan. -- Regards, Savageduck
From: George Kerby on 3 Aug 2010 14:36
On 8/3/10 10:21 AM, in article 2010080308215079149-savageduck1(a)REMOVESPAMmecom, "Savageduck" <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote: > On 2010-08-03 08:13:13 -0700, George Kerby <ghost_topper(a)hotmail.com> said: > >> >> >> >> On 8/2/10 8:21 PM, in article >> d9e7839f-2682-4eaf-bab0-fad5f2f66c2d(a)g19g2000yqc.googlegroups.com, "Nervous >> Nick" <nervous.nick(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On Aug 2, 6:43�pm, Larry Thong <larry_th...(a)shitstring.com> wrote: >>>> Baboons do it in the zoo, they even do it in the wild. �It must be a fun >>>> activity as it seems to be spreading. >>>> >>>> <http://i298.photobucket.com/albums/mm261/Ritaberk/Lice.jpg> >>> >>> Why did you choose to share this photo? Were you jonesing for a >>> reason to use a double exclamation point? >> >> Just when we thought Rita was gaining control of the medications, he veers >> off again. Oh well... > > ...but all things considered it is not a bad candid capture, clearly > > demonstrating just how good the 70-200 f/2.8 can be. > > The baiting, tongue in cheek subject lines continue to be a groan. Not just a 'groan', a completely derailed train of thought that most likely came from the influence of mis-managed pharmaceuticals. Tell me, looking at that photograph, the thought of baboons picking lice would be *your* primary choice for a cut line? Thought not. Most normal folks as well. Maybe Rita speaks from personal experiences? Dunno... |