Prev: iP*d synchonising
Next: Mac Friendly Sat Navs
From: Richard Kettlewell on 5 Aug 2010 11:45 Peter Kemp <peterk13(a)nospam.ntlworld.com> writes: > We've tried the telnet approach and it certainly seems that the SMTP > server is accepting mail (ie the 'rcpt to:<...> line got a positive > response), but then things didn't go quite as expected. We sent > subject: and to: and short body text followed by <crlf>.<crlf> but > instead of the expected "250 Queued mail for delivery" message, we got > "250 x-plusnet-relay: " and a long string (message id?). Certainly, the > e-mail didn't get to the designated recipient. 250 is the important bit; everything else is noise. 250 means the SMTP server accepted the message. Why it didn't get any further is something only plusnet could really tell you. -- http://www.greenend.org.uk/rjk/
From: Peter Kemp on 5 Aug 2010 15:47 In article <87tyn912su.fsf(a)araminta.anjou.terraraq.org.uk>, Richard Kettlewell <rjk(a)greenend.org.uk> wrote: <snip> > > 250 is the important bit; everything else is noise. 250 means the SMTP > server accepted the message. Why it didn't get any further is something > only plusnet could really tell you. That's very interesting and most useful - thanks. Current plan: - re-install (what's to lose...?) - configure Mail from scratch - cross fingers. And if that don't work, then we'll have another go at telnet and then post the session log to Plusnet... Regards Peter
From: Paul Womar on 6 Aug 2010 03:59
Richard Kettlewell <rjk(a)greenend.org.uk> wrote: > Peter Kemp <peterk13(a)nospam.ntlworld.com> writes: > > > We've tried the telnet approach and it certainly seems that the SMTP > > server is accepting mail (ie the 'rcpt to:<...> line got a positive > > response), but then things didn't go quite as expected. We sent > > subject: and to: and short body text followed by <crlf>.<crlf> but > > instead of the expected "250 Queued mail for delivery" message, we got > > "250 x-plusnet-relay: " and a long string (message id?). Certainly, the > > e-mail didn't get to the designated recipient. > > 250 is the important bit; everything else is noise. 250 means the SMTP > server accepted the message. Why it didn't get any further is something > only plusnet could really tell you. Some people are suspicious of mails with no (or limited) headers but I would hope that's not the case here, can't really think what else it may be though! It may be worth the original poster putting a blank line after the "Subject:" when sending the message via telnet, as it was origianlly written, the subject would end up as part of the body. -- -> The email address used in this message *IS* valid <- |