Poor Sony. Mini review versus full reviews for warmed over Canon and Nikon APS cameras
in [Digital Cameras]
|
Prev: Poor Sony. Mini review versus full reviews for warmed over Canon and Nikon APS cameras
Next: Arte docu: Contacts
From: Bruce on 15 Apr 2010 19:58 On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 16:20:25 -0700 (PDT), RichA <rander3127(a)gmail.com> wrote: >On Apr 15, 7:16�pm, Bruce <docnews2...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 15:34:35 -0700 (PDT), RichA <rander3...(a)gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >Get to the back of the camera bus, Sony. �(Dpreview). >> >> >http://www.dpreview.com/news/1004/10041504sonydslr850review.asp >> >> There is no need for a full review, as it's just a dumbed-down and >> cheapened Sony A900. > >It is by far the least expensive high resolution FF DSLR, it deserved >its own review, especially if they feel they have to review every >cookie-cutter entry-level camera that comes along. Nonsense. Its sensor performance is almost identical to that of the A900, because it has the same sensor. No need to test that all over again.
From: Bruce on 16 Apr 2010 13:03
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 17:23:13 -0700 (PDT), Rich <rander3127(a)gmail.com> wrote: >On Apr 15, 7:58�pm, Bruce <docnews2...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 16:20:25 -0700 (PDT), RichA <rander3...(a)gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >On Apr 15, 7:16 pm, Bruce <docnews2...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 15:34:35 -0700 (PDT), RichA <rander3...(a)gmail.com> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >Get to the back of the camera bus, Sony. (Dpreview). >> >> >> >http://www.dpreview.com/news/1004/10041504sonydslr850review.asp >> >> >> There is no need for a full review, as it's just a dumbed-down and >> >> cheapened Sony A900. >> >> >It is by far the least expensive high resolution FF DSLR, it deserved >> >its own review, especially if they feel they have to review every >> >cookie-cutter entry-level camera that comes along. >> >> Nonsense. � >> >> Its sensor performance is almost identical to that of the A900, >> because it has the same sensor. �No need to test that all over again. > >Unlike this one: > >http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/nikond300s/ You're right. Unlike that one, because there are very significant differences between the D300S and its D300 predecessor. In contrast, the differences between the A850 and A900 are relatively insignificant. It's good that you are beginning to understand these things. |