From: Matthias Andree on 27 May 2010 11:19 Am 26.05.2010 22:24, schrieb Jerry: > I inquired about it a month or so ago. Other posters replied favorable > regarding it. However, since there is a dearth of drivers for any of the > newer chip sets that support the 'N' wireless protocol, it might well > be of limited usefulness. Porting NetworkManager is *not* going to repair the absense of a driver. -- Matthias Andree _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports(a)freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe(a)freebsd.org"
From: Jerry on 27 May 2010 19:28 On Thu, 27 May 2010 17:19:50 +0200 Matthias Andree <matthias.andree(a)gmx.de> articulated: > Am 26.05.2010 22:24, schrieb Jerry: > > > I inquired about it a month or so ago. Other posters replied > > favorable regarding it. However, since there is a dearth of drivers > > for any of the newer chip sets that support the 'N' wireless > > protocol, it might well be of limited usefulness. > > Porting NetworkManager is *not* going to repair the absense of a > driver. Precisely my point. -- Jerry FreeBSD-Ports.user(a)seibercom.net Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports(a)freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe(a)freebsd.org"
From: David DEMELIER on 28 May 2010 06:11 2010/5/26 Matthias Andree <mandree(a)freebsd.org>: > Am 26.05.2010 14:19, schrieb Jesse Smith: >> I was told that requests for new ports should be submitted here. There's >> one tool which I would like to see brought into the Ports system and >> that's Network Manager >> (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Tools/NetworkManager) >> >> It's the only networking tool I've found so far which will properly >> handle my Novatel mobile modem and I would really like to be able to >> make use of the modem while running FreeBSD. > > Hi Jesse, > > Network Manager (NM) will just automate steps you can do with other means, too. > It is not doing magic of any kind, and chances are your modem needs firmware > that is available for Linux but not for FreeBSD, but I know nothing about your > Novatel device. > > Regarding a FreeBSD port: > > (a) NM needs major porting efforts, and is an open, non-trivial, project of the > GNOME team, see <http://www.freebsd.org/gnome/docs/volunteer.html> > > (b) I personally find that NM is an abomination that - particularly on Laptops - > causes more problems than it could possibly solve for me. > Â Â I routinely deinstall NetworkManager from openSUSE, Fedora, and Ubuntu Linux > distributions, because it frequently fails to configure WPA2-Enterprise with > EAP-TLS or EAP-TTLS, fails to detect online state (making several applications > start in offline mode or refuse to even attempt to connect), fails to configure > hidden 802.11 (WiFi/WLAN) networks, and causes other artifacts I don't have > without NM. > > I'd personally also say Network Manager needs upstream bugfixing much more than > a port. Haven't tried Fedora 13 "Goddard" yet though. > I agree, personally I would prefer a wpa_supplicant / dhclient graphical user interface instead of the sucky NetworkManager. For the moment there is sysutils/wifimgr iirc but it's a quite unstable. wpa_supplicant does everything, scanning for access points automatically even you don't have X running, all WPA means of associations, it's just perfect. -- Demelier David _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports(a)freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe(a)freebsd.org"
From: Lars Engels on 28 May 2010 06:19 On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 12:11:10PM +0200, David DEMELIER wrote: > > I agree, personally I would prefer a wpa_supplicant / dhclient > graphical user interface instead of the sucky NetworkManager. For the > moment there is sysutils/wifimgr iirc but it's a quite unstable. > > wpa_supplicant does everything, scanning for access points > automatically even you don't have X running, all WPA means of > associations, it's just perfect. Take a look at this: > make -C /usr/ports quicksearch name=pcbsd- Port: pcbsd-netmanager-8.0_1 Path: /usr/ports/net/pcbsd-netmanager Info: PC-BSD Networking Utilities for KDE4
From: James Butler on 28 May 2010 20:42 On 28 May 2010 22:19, Lars Engels <lars.engels(a)0x20.net> wrote: > On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 12:11:10PM +0200, David DEMELIER wrote: >> >> I agree, personally I would prefer a wpa_supplicant / dhclient >> graphical user interface instead of the sucky NetworkManager. For the >> moment there is sysutils/wifimgr iirc but it's a quite unstable. >> >> wpa_supplicant does everything, scanning for access points >> automatically even you don't have X running, all WPA means of >> associations, it's just perfect. > > Take a look at this: >> make -C /usr/ports quicksearch name=pcbsd- > Port: Â pcbsd-netmanager-8.0_1 > Path: Â /usr/ports/net/pcbsd-netmanager > Info: Â PC-BSD Networking Utilities for KDE4 > Or (still QT4-based, but doesn't depend on KDE libs) net/wpa_gui - not that I've actually tried it. I briefly had a look at what would be required to implement a basic PyGTK-based wpa_supplicant GUI. One annoying thing is that (arguably) the easiest way for an external app to communicate with wpa_supplicant is via dbus, but wpa_supplicant in FreeBSD is built without dbus support; another option would be to use something like http://projects.otaku42.de/browser/python-wpactrl. -James Butler _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports(a)freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe(a)freebsd.org"
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 Prev: src/usr.sbin/portsnap .cvs & .svn directories. Next: graphics/sane-backends 1.0.21 fails |