Ports unstable for the next 10 days
in [Ports]
|
Prev: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days
Next: cvs commit: ports/print/panda/files patch-configure
From: Niclas Zeising on 8 Apr 2010 09:04 On 2010-04-08 14:42, Antonio Olivares wrote: > On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 7:36 AM, Ion-Mihai Tetcu<itetcu(a)freebsd.org> wrote: >> On Wed, 7 Apr 2010 07:20:47 -0500 >> Antonio Olivares<olivares14031(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >> [ .. ] >> >>> ===>>> Port directory: /usr/ports/sysutils/fusefs-kmod >>> ===>>> This port is marked IGNORE >>> ===>>> requires the userland sources to be installed. Set >>> SRC_BASE if it is not in /usr/src >>> >>> ===>>> If you are sure you can build it, remove the >>> IGNORE line in the Makefile and try again. >>> >>> ===>>> Update for sysutils/fusefs-kmod failed >>> ===>>> Aborting update >> >> [ .. ] >>> What should I do in this case? >> >> First, please don't top post. >> >> Second, you don't seem to have the base sources installed and that >> port, being a kernel module, needs them. >> See: >> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cvsup.html >> >> -- >> IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" >> "Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect" >> FreeBSD committer -> itetcu(a)FreeBSD.org, PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B >> > > Dear Ion-Mihai, > > I have installed cvsup, but I don't really understand the page that I > was refered to > > ===> SECURITY REPORT: > This port has installed the following files which may act as network > servers and may therefore pose a remote security risk to the system. > /usr/local/sbin/cvsupd > /usr/local/bin/cvsup > /usr/local/bin/cvpasswd > > If there are vulnerabilities in these programs there may be a security > risk to the system. FreeBSD makes no guarantee about the security of > ports included in the Ports Collection. Please type 'make deinstall' > to deinstall the port if this is a concern. > > For more information, and contact details about the security > status of this software, see the following webpage: > http://www.cvsup.org/ > ===> Cleaning for ezm3-1.1_2 > ===> Cleaning for cvsup-without-gui-16.1h_4 > > I have installed it using ports system, but still get same error as > above. I try to use cvsup the file, I get nothing, I try to go to the > port that refuses to update and make install clean and it says source > not available or refused? > > I have used ports before and had no problems, I don't know what to do. > > Thank you and others who have provided help. > > *Sorry for top posting > > > Regards, > > Antonio Hi! A good place to start when you're new to FreeBSD or have questions is the FreeBSD handbook, available at http://www.freebsd.org/handbook. In your case I suggest you read http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cvsup.html which details how you can get the sources for the FreeBSD operating system, including the kernel, which is what you need to be able to build fuesefs-kmod. Also, csup, a replacement for cvsup written in C, has been around in base for quite some time. You can use that instead of cvsup. Also, in your case, there is a standard cvsup file you can use together with csup or cvsup. It resides in /usr/share/examples/cvsup/standard-supfile so you don't have to make your own. I hope this helps you! Regards! //Niclas _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports(a)freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe(a)freebsd.org"
From: Charlie Kester on 8 Apr 2010 16:23 On Sun 28 Mar 2010 at 06:38:28 PDT Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: >Hi, > > >As announced before, a few big commits, that touch some thousands ports >are being done: png, curl, x11, gnome, kde4. The target ETA is 6-7 >April. > >The first one was done, update of graphics/png (including a shared lib >version bump), with about 5000 ports affected. > >We do _NOT_ recommend updating ports until this commits are all done, >and the problems are fixed, except if you want to help testing / fixing. > >Before reporting failures, please take a look at ports@ list, and >http://qat.tecnik93.com/index.php?action=failed_buildports&sort=last_built >to find out if the problem hasn't already been reported or even fixed. >We also have two incremental builds on Pointy to catch the problems. > > >Thank you, > >With hat: portmgr@ Sorry if this seems like nagging, but since we're now past the original ETA can we get a current status report? Is the portstree considered stable again, and if not, what's the revised ETA? _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports(a)freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe(a)freebsd.org"
From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu on 8 Apr 2010 17:20 On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 13:23:08 -0700 Charlie Kester <corky1951(a)comcast.net> wrote: > On Sun 28 Mar 2010 at 06:38:28 PDT Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > >Hi, > > > > > >As announced before, a few big commits, that touch some thousands > >ports are being done: png, curl, x11, gnome, kde4. The target ETA is > >6-7 April. > > > >The first one was done, update of graphics/png (including a shared > >lib version bump), with about 5000 ports affected. > > > >We do _NOT_ recommend updating ports until this commits are all done, > >and the problems are fixed, except if you want to help testing / > >fixing. > > > >Before reporting failures, please take a look at ports@ list, and > >http://qat.tecnik93.com/index.php?action=failed_buildports&sort=last_built > >to find out if the problem hasn't already been reported or even > >fixed. We also have two incremental builds on Pointy to catch the > >problems. > > > > > >Thank you, > > > >With hat: portmgr@ > > > Sorry if this seems like nagging, but since we're now past the > original ETA can we get a current status report? Is the portstree > considered stable again, and if not, what's the revised ETA? From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu(a)FreeBSD.org> To: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu(a)FreeBSD.org> Cc: stable(a)freebsd.org, questions(a)freebsd.org, freebsd-ports(a)freebsd.org Subject: Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 21:31:33 +0300 Just a status update: PNG and cURL are in, and png fall-outs are believed to be fixed. Xorg update has gone through an -exp run on Pointy and our xorg team is working on fixing the approx. 60 ports with problems. >>>> still work to do I will begin -exp runs for Gnome and KDE updates tonight or tomorrow morning. >>> Gnome -exp done, there's a showstopper on amd64 that we weren't aware >>> of. about 40 fixesso far. An other -exp needed. >>>> KDE in progress. Packages status: - i386: - 6 after png and curl - 7 after png and curl - an 8 incremental build is in progress and should be shortly finished >>>>finished - 9 pacakges are from middle March >>> from 9 Apr. - amd64: - 6 packages are post png and curl - 7 build is in progress and will be finished tomorrow - 8 last build was done in the middle of the png update/fixes; we won't run an other before Xorg, KDE and Gnome go in (for lack of resources). >>> in progress, with ports from yesterday - 9 build in progress (with sources that are believed to fix the zlib problem). >>>> nope, still old packages. In other words, if you wish to update without waiting for Xorg, Gnome and KDE now it's a good moment. >>> So no clear ETA yet, a few days more. -- IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" "Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect" FreeBSD committer -> itetcu(a)FreeBSD.org, PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B
From: Ted Faber on 13 Apr 2010 19:03 On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 04:38:28PM +0300, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > Hi, > > > As announced before, a few big commits, that touch some thousands ports > are being done: png, curl, x11, gnome, kde4. The target ETA is 6-7 > April. I didn't see any mial, but figured I'd check. Are ports still unstable? -- Ted Faber http://www.isi.edu/~faber PGP: http://www.isi.edu/~faber/pubkeys.asc Unexpected attachment on this mail? See http://www.isi.edu/~faber/FAQ.html#SIG
From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu on 14 Apr 2010 02:15
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 16:03:22 -0700 Ted Faber <faber(a)isi.edu> wrote: > On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 04:38:28PM +0300, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > > Hi, > > > > > > As announced before, a few big commits, that touch some thousands > > ports are being done: png, curl, x11, gnome, kde4. The target ETA > > is 6-7 April. > > I didn't see any mial, but figured I'd check. Are ports still > unstable? ATM no, as it's apparent from the message bellow. Update to that message: - Gnome and KDE are ready - Xorg is believed to be ready, an -exp run on pointy is beginning today. On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 13:23:08 -0700 Charlie Kester <corky1951(a)comcast.net> wrote: > On Sun 28 Mar 2010 at 06:38:28 PDT Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > >Hi, > > > > > >As announced before, a few big commits, that touch some thousands > >ports are being done: png, curl, x11, gnome, kde4. The target ETA is > >6-7 April. > > > >The first one was done, update of graphics/png (including a shared > >lib version bump), with about 5000 ports affected. > > > >We do _NOT_ recommend updating ports until this commits are all done, > >and the problems are fixed, except if you want to help testing / > >fixing. > > > >Before reporting failures, please take a look at ports@ list, and > >http://qat.tecnik93.com/index.php?action=failed_buildports&sort=last_built > >to find out if the problem hasn't already been reported or even > >fixed. We also have two incremental builds on Pointy to catch the > >problems. > > > > > >Thank you, > > > >With hat: portmgr@ > > > Sorry if this seems like nagging, but since we're now past the > original ETA can we get a current status report? Is the portstree > considered stable again, and if not, what's the revised ETA? From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu(a)FreeBSD.org> To: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu(a)FreeBSD.org> Cc: stable(a)freebsd.org, questions(a)freebsd.org, freebsd-ports(a)freebsd.org Subject: Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 21:31:33 +0300 Just a status update: PNG and cURL are in, and png fall-outs are believed to be fixed. Xorg update has gone through an -exp run on Pointy and our xorg team is working on fixing the approx. 60 ports with problems. >>>> still work to do I will begin -exp runs for Gnome and KDE updates tonight or tomorrow morning. >>> Gnome -exp done, there's a showstopper on amd64 that we weren't aware >>> of. about 40 fixesso far. An other -exp needed. >>>> KDE in progress. Packages status: - i386: - 6 after png and curl - 7 after png and curl - an 8 incremental build is in progress and should be shortly finished >>>>finished - 9 pacakges are from middle March >>> from 9 Apr. - amd64: - 6 packages are post png and curl - 7 build is in progress and will be finished tomorrow - 8 last build was done in the middle of the png update/fixes; we won't run an other before Xorg, KDE and Gnome go in (for lack of resources). >>> in progress, with ports from yesterday - 9 build in progress (with sources that are believed to fix the zlib problem). >>>> nope, still old packages. In other words, if you wish to update without waiting for Xorg, Gnome and KDE now it's a good moment. >>> So no clear ETA yet, a few days more. -- IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" "Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect" FreeBSD committer -> itetcu(a)FreeBSD.org, PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B |