From: J. P. Gilliver (John) on
In message <fn7sq55kcgle2nfla7clrluqtia8acgiki(a)4ax.com>, "Ken Blake,
MVP" <kblake(a)this.is.an.invalid.domain> writes:
>
>On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 21:20:31 -0000, "Tim Meddick"
><timmeddick(a)gawab.com> wrote:
>
>> Every copy of Windows is different - you can't just "paste" in any
>>old "key" into any
>> copy of Windows - no, each key is unique to that copy (cd-rom) it was
>>made for.
>
>
>Sorry, but that's *not* correct. Keys are not made for each CD. Each
>key is unique, but the CDs are not, so any key will work with a CD
>that it matches with respect to Home vs. Professional, Retail vs
>Generic OEM, Full vs Upgrade).
>
Well done: that's what I was trying to say, but you managed to say it in
far fewer words (and thus much easier to understand)!

I suspect Tim actually meant that anyway, too.
--
J. P. Gilliver. 27 years experience in the electronics industry - seeking
employment (also computer, tester, trainer ...); email for details: CV at
http://www.soft255.demon.co.uk/CV2010-3.tif (2-sheet TIFF)!

Computers make it easy for humans to make mistakes that are hard to fix -
Thomas
Landauer (author and psychiatry professor), quoted by Colin Barker (Computing
1999-2-18, p. 21)
From: Ken Blake, MVP on
On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 12:17:32 +0100, "J. P. Gilliver (John)"
<G6JPG(a)soft255.demon.co.uk> wrote:

> In message <fn7sq55kcgle2nfla7clrluqtia8acgiki(a)4ax.com>, "Ken Blake,
> MVP" <kblake(a)this.is.an.invalid.domain> writes:
> >
> >On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 21:20:31 -0000, "Tim Meddick"
> ><timmeddick(a)gawab.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Every copy of Windows is different - you can't just "paste" in any
> >>old "key" into any
> >> copy of Windows - no, each key is unique to that copy (cd-rom) it was
> >>made for.
> >
> >
> >Sorry, but that's *not* correct. Keys are not made for each CD. Each
> >key is unique, but the CDs are not, so any key will work with a CD
> >that it matches with respect to Home vs. Professional, Retail vs
> >Generic OEM, Full vs Upgrade).
> >
> Well done: that's what I was trying to say, but you managed to say it in
> far fewer words (and thus much easier to understand)!
>
> I suspect Tim actually meant that anyway, too.


Perhaps that's what Tim meant, but I didn't read it way, so I thought
I'd clarify it.

--
Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP (Windows Desktop Experience) since 2003
Please Reply to the Newsgroup
From: Tim Meddick on
(To others who generously thought I meant something else - I didn't - sorry)

Well, I tried entering a valid key into (all non-OEM) copies of Win98, WinME and
WinNT4 and none of those ever worked!!

What makes XP so different that it will accept unique keys from any similar XP
version?

==

Cheers, Tim Meddick, Peckham, London. :-)




"Ken Blake, MVP" <kblake(a)this.is.an.invalid.domain> wrote in message
news:fn7sq55kcgle2nfla7clrluqtia8acgiki(a)4ax.com...
> On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 21:20:31 -0000, "Tim Meddick"
> <timmeddick(a)gawab.com> wrote:
>
>> Every copy of Windows is different - you can't just "paste" in any old "key" into
>> any
>> copy of Windows - no, each key is unique to that copy (cd-rom) it was made for.
>
>
> Sorry, but that's *not* correct. Keys are not made for each CD. Each
> key is unique, but the CDs are not, so any key will work with a CD
> that it matches with respect to Home vs. Professional, Retail vs
> Generic OEM, Full vs Upgrade).
>
> --
> Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP (Windows Desktop Experience) since 2003
> Please Reply to the Newsgroup

From: J. P. Gilliver (John) on
In message <ei62yyqzKHA.1236(a)TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl>, Tim Meddick
<timmeddick(a)gawab.com> writes:
>(To others who generously thought I meant something else - I didn't - sorry)
>
>Well, I tried entering a valid key into (all non-OEM) copies of Win98,
>WinME and WinNT4 and none of those ever worked!!

In what sense was it "a valid key"? For what? (Though I do remember - a
_long_ time ago - finding that a key from one Microsoft product worked
with another: I think that might have been Windows 95 and Office 95. But
as I say, that was a long time ago. Almost certainly not now.)
>
>What makes XP so different that it will accept unique keys from any
>similar XP version?
[]
I think what Ken and I mean is this: the CDs are not made individually -
they're mass-produced, much like audio CDs. (For a long time I've
wondered why they _don't_ make a CD with a tiny writable part, but they
don't.) [XP isn't different in this respect.] If you were to obtain two
CDs for the same product - two retail copies of XP, 98, Office, or
probably even Vista or 7 - then as long as they were _exactly_ the same
product (Home or Pro, retail or OEM, if OEM for the same batch of
hardware), then the same key would work with both - until you went
online to register the second one, at least. But it _would_ get you
through the installation process.
--
J. P. Gilliver. 27 years experience in the electronics industry - seeking
employment (also computer, tester, trainer ...); email for details: CV at
http://www.soft255.demon.co.uk/CV2010-3.tif (2-sheet TIFF)!

War is God's way of teaching Americans geography. -Ambrose Bierce, writer
(1842-1914)
From: Tim Meddick on
That IS what I'm saying - I can't be any clearer.

I had [have] copies of WinME, Win98se and WinNT4 and they come with keys (that work).

On entering other keys that I know work with other [respective] versions of each,
they simply do not work.

Why is this, if, as you two keep saying, XP can use *any* valid key for any
[sub-version] copy of Windows?

==

Cheers, Tim Meddick, Peckham, London. :-)




"J. P. Gilliver (John)" <G6JPG(a)soft255.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:n7yYoQlvS$rLFw4m(a)soft255.demon.co.uk...
> In message <ei62yyqzKHA.1236(a)TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl>, Tim Meddick
> <timmeddick(a)gawab.com> writes:
>>(To others who generously thought I meant something else - I didn't - sorry)
>>
>>Well, I tried entering a valid key into (all non-OEM) copies of Win98,
>>WinME and WinNT4 and none of those ever worked!!
>
> In what sense was it "a valid key"? For what? (Though I do remember - a _long_ time
> ago - finding that a key from one Microsoft product worked with another: I think
> that might have been Windows 95 and Office 95. But as I say, that was a long time
> ago. Almost certainly not now.)
>>
>>What makes XP so different that it will accept unique keys from any similar XP
>>version?
> []
> I think what Ken and I mean is this: the CDs are not made individually - they're
> mass-produced, much like audio CDs. (For a long time I've wondered why they _don't_
> make a CD with a tiny writable part, but they don't.) [XP isn't different in this
> respect.] If you were to obtain two CDs for the same product - two retail copies of
> XP, 98, Office, or probably even Vista or 7 - then as long as they were _exactly_
> the same product (Home or Pro, retail or OEM, if OEM for the same batch of
> hardware), then the same key would work with both - until you went online to
> register the second one, at least. But it _would_ get you through the installation
> process.
> --
> J. P. Gilliver. 27 years experience in the electronics industry - seeking
> employment (also computer, tester, trainer ...); email for details: CV at
> http://www.soft255.demon.co.uk/CV2010-3.tif (2-sheet TIFF)!
>
> War is God's way of teaching Americans geography. -Ambrose Bierce, writer
> (1842-1914)