Prev: GR prediction for precession of perihelion of Mercury is not quite right
Next: Cauchy problem
From: Koobee Wublee on 2 Jul 2010 01:12
On Jul 1, 5:24 pm, artful <artful...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Jul 2, 10:16 am, Koobee Wublee wrote:

> > Well, you are unable to see the fallacy in the mathematics of the
> > Lorentz transform. <shrug>
>
> You mean the one you've been asked to show and of which you have
> failed to produce evidence ?

Wrong again. Read my lips. I said

"You are unable to see the fallacy in the mathematics of the Lorentz
transform."

<shrug>

Try again.
From: Koobee Wublee on 2 Jul 2010 01:14
On Jul 1, 2:01 pm, harald <h...(a)swissonline.ch> wrote:
> On Jul 1, 7:42 pm, Koobee Wublee wrote:

> > It is no error. Langevin was the first to notice this twins’
> > paradox. However, he cranked himself by proposing nonsense to resolve
> > this paradox.
>
> What nonsense, do you think? ;-)

The nonsense of erroneously applying the Lorentz transform. What
else?
From: artful on 2 Jul 2010 01:15
On Jul 2, 3:12 pm, Koobee Wublee <koobee.wub...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jul 1, 5:24 pm, artful <artful...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Jul 2, 10:16 am, Koobee Wublee wrote:
> > > Well, you are unable to see the fallacy in the mathematics of the
> > > Lorentz transform.  <shrug>
>
> > You mean the one you've been asked to show and of which you have
> > failed to produce evidence ?
>
> Wrong again.

Yes you are

>  Read my lips.  I said
>
> "You are unable to see the fallacy in the mathematics of the Lorentz
> transform."

Of course I cannot see what isn't there. There is no fallacy .. You
have never shown one.

Try again
From: Surfer on 2 Jul 2010 03:09
On Thu, 01 Jul 2010 18:41:06 -0400, "J. Clarke"
<jclarke.usenet(a)cox.net> wrote:

>On 7/1/2010 5:03 PM, Surfer wrote:
>> On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 22:14:59 -0700 (PDT), Koobee Wublee
>
><remainder snipped>
>
>Was it really necessary for you to repost that entire pile of drivel?
>
Sorry for the unnecessary post.

As my news reader didn't correctly display some of characters I fixed
them in an edit window in order to read it, but accidently clicked on
"send" instead of "save".



From: artful on 2 Jul 2010 03:16
On Jul 2, 5:09 pm, Surfer <n...(a)spam.net> wrote:
> On Thu, 01 Jul 2010 18:41:06 -0400, "J. Clarke"
>
> <jclarke.use...(a)cox.net> wrote:
> >On 7/1/2010 5:03 PM, Surfer wrote:
> >> On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 22:14:59 -0700 (PDT), Koobee Wublee
>
> ><remainder snipped>
>
> >Was it really necessary for you to repost that entire pile of drivel?
>
> Sorry for the unnecessary post.
>
> As my news reader didn't correctly display some of characters I fixed
> them in an edit window in order to read it,  but accidently clicked on
> "send" instead of "save".

I've had odd things like that happen before .. certainly understandable
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Prev: GR prediction for precession of perihelion of Mercury is not quite right
Next: Cauchy problem