Pricelessware List 2009 - Submissions, Nominations and Seconds Thread
in [Freeware]
|
Prev: Find duplicate videos based on the video (independant of size, CRC, name, date)?
Next: Pricelessware List 2009 - General Discussion Thread
From: Franklin on 22 Sep 2009 03:11 Ron May wrote: > UPDATE - Sep 22, 2009 - 2:00am CDT - 0700 UTC/GMT > > About five and a half days left, and so far 130 programs have received > both a nomination and second, and 39 more programs have been nominated > and are waiting for a second. Looking good! > Seems to me that the deadline for nominations may be too soon. Perhaps it should be extended?
From: Ron May on 22 Sep 2009 04:28 On Tue, 22 Sep 2009 08:11:50 +0100, Franklin <fr(a)nk.lin> wrote: > Ron May wrote: > > > UPDATE - Sep 22, 2009 - 2:00am CDT - 0700 UTC/GMT > > > > About five and a half days left, and so far 130 programs have received > > both a nomination and second, and 39 more programs have been nominated > > and are waiting for a second. Looking good! > > > > Seems to me that the deadline for nominations may be too soon. Perhaps it > should be extended? By the current deadline of this coming Sunday Noon US CDT, nominations will have been open for 21 days. That's three full weeks and there's still more than five full days left as this is being written. That's not to say that the deadline can't be extended if enough people call for it, but I suspect many people feel like I do that the time is sufficient. I'm sure there are others who feel it's too long. Comments, anyone? -- Ron M. Help improve the ACF experience. Please don't feed the trolls. New to the group? Check out http://www.pricelesswarehome.org/ and try to ignore the threads that aren't freeware related.
From: Franklin on 22 Sep 2009 12:19 Craig wrote: > On 09/22/2009 04:57 AM, Yrrah wrote: >> Ron May<mayron(a)hotmail.com>: >>> Franklin wrote: >>> >>>> Seems to me that the deadline for nominations may be too soon. >>>> Perhaps it should be extended? >>> >>> By the current deadline of this coming Sunday Noon US CDT, nominations >>> will have been open for 21 days. That's three full weeks and there's >>> still more than five full days left as this is being written. >> >> Three weeks is enough imho. But perhaps the period could be extended >> for seconding nominations only (a few days). > > If we knew /why/ Franklin thinks it's too short a time it might be > helpful. Let's see if others are thinking similarly or if there's some > concrete reason behind Franklin's comments. We have time. > Three weeks should be enough but at this stage of the nominations it seems a larger proportion of apps than usual will be dropped from the current list. Of course you can't tell until the deadline passes so it's only be an impression. That's why I wrote the deadline for nominations may be too soon.
From: T0M on 22 Sep 2009 13:38 Yrrah a �crit: >>(1) PROGRAM NAME: EAC >> >>(2) LINK: http://www.exactaudiocopy.de/ >> >>(3) DESCRIPTION: Exact Audio Copy is a grabber for audio CDs. The main >>difference between EAC and other free audio grabbers is that it works >>with a technology which reads audio CDs almost perfectly. If there are >>errors that can�t be corrected, it will tell you on which time >>position the (possible) distortion occurred, so you can try to correct >>it. EAC has a small audio editor and a GUI for command line audio >>compressors e.g. lame). >> >>Yrrah Seconded T0M
From: Shadow on 22 Sep 2009 16:55
On Tue, 22 Sep 2009 15:48:52 -0400, Susan Bugher <sebugher(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >Ron May wrote: > >> UPDATE - Sep 22, 2009 - 2:00am CDT - 0700 UTC/GMT > >I nominate: > >Program: Universal Extractor >Author: Jared Breland >Ware: (Freeware) (open source: GNU GPL) >http://www.legroom.net/software/uniextract >Current Version: 1.6, Released: 10/17/2008 >WINDOWS_OS: Win32 Shhht. I use this all the time Seconded. |