Proof that consciousness is NOT in the brain
in [Physics]
|
Prev: *** Re: Experts doubt Einstein..... but Einstein Dingleberries still worship him
Next: Quantum physicists have a novel plan for an experiment that usesthe human eye to detect "spooky action at a distance"
From: Benj on 8 Jun 2010 01:17 On Jun 4, 10:11 pm, Uncle Vic <addr...(a)withheld.com> wrote: > So what exactly is a "Social Darwinist"? Go look in a mirror! > Scientists have dogma? What if they discover something tested to be true > that lies outside of this dogma? Does the dogma change? Can dogma change? Do scientists have dogma? You don't get around much, do you? If experiment shows something true outside of dogma, scientists do what priests of ANY religion (including atheism) do. They ridicule and dismiss the results and attack the persons finding those results or supporting them with ad hominem attacks. Usually to assert they are "insane". We don't need to pay attention to the insane ramblings, do we? OF course "dogma" needs to change. One needs to "smash" dogma because dogma is not logic or science.
From: Benj on 8 Jun 2010 01:25 On Jun 7, 8:54 am, raven1 <quoththera...(a)nevermore.com> wrote: > On Fri, 4 Jun 2010 12:59:04 -0700 (PDT), Benj <bjac...(a)iwaynet.net> > wrote: > > >The problem here isn't "drivel" it is the clash of two scientific > >viewpoints. > > No, it's a clash between a scientific viewpoint and unsupported > woo-woo. Ah yes. "proof by asssertion". I know that always has me loosing every debate! Let's face it, pal, Social Darwin is your religion and you'll never deny it's dogma no matter HOW may facts are staring you in the face. None so blind...etc. You have no idea what true science is or how it works.
From: Olrik on 8 Jun 2010 01:29 Le 2010-06-08 01:25, Benj a �crit : > On Jun 7, 8:54 am, raven1<quoththera...(a)nevermore.com> wrote: >> On Fri, 4 Jun 2010 12:59:04 -0700 (PDT), Benj<bjac...(a)iwaynet.net> >> wrote: >> >>> The problem here isn't "drivel" it is the clash of two scientific >>> viewpoints. >> >> No, it's a clash between a scientific viewpoint and unsupported >> woo-woo. > > Ah yes. "proof by asssertion". I know that always has me loosing every > debate! Let's face it, pal, Social Darwin is your religion and you'll > never deny it's dogma no matter HOW may facts Present one. > are staring you in the > face. None so blind...etc. > > You have no idea what true science is or how it works. Tell us about it. Many thanks! Olrik
From: Benj on 8 Jun 2010 01:58 On Jun 8, 1:29 am, Olrik <olrik...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > Ah yes. "proof by asssertion". I know that always has me loosing every > > debate! Let's face it, pal, Social Darwin is your religion and you'll > > never deny it's dogma no matter HOW may facts > Present one. Sorry Olrik, but I only pointed out the nature of the debate. I'm not taking sides in it (no matter how I might be painted by your side). So I'm not here to spoon feed you facts relevant to EITHER viewpoint. And apparently even if I did you'd just deny them as your dogma rejects any such suggestions. > > are staring you in the > > face. None so blind...etc. > > > You have no idea what true science is or how it works. > Tell us about it. And thus, I am also not here to provide you with a science education. There are still a few places where such can still be found. Seek one out.
From: raven1 on 8 Jun 2010 08:53
On Mon, 7 Jun 2010 22:25:52 -0700 (PDT), Benj <bjacoby(a)iwaynet.net> wrote: >On Jun 7, 8:54�am, raven1 <quoththera...(a)nevermore.com> wrote: >> On Fri, 4 Jun 2010 12:59:04 -0700 (PDT), Benj <bjac...(a)iwaynet.net> >> wrote: >> >> >The problem here isn't "drivel" it is the clash of two scientific >> >viewpoints. >> >> No, it's a clash between a scientific viewpoint and unsupported >> woo-woo. > >Ah yes. "proof by asssertion". I know that always has me loosing every >debate! How sad for you. > Let's face it, pal, Social Darwin is your religion I doubt you'll find many people espousing "Social Darwinism", nor is it a religion in any meaningful sense of the word. > and you'll >never deny it's dogma What dogma is that? >no matter HOW may facts are staring you in the >face. Such as? >None so blind...etc. > >You have no idea what true science is or how it works. Enlighten us then, Einstein. |