From: raven1 on
On Mon, 7 Jun 2010 22:58:38 -0700 (PDT), Benj <bjacoby(a)iwaynet.net>
wrote:

>On Jun 8, 1:29�am, Olrik <olrik...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> > Ah yes. "proof by asssertion". I know that always has me loosing every
>> > debate! �Let's face it, pal, Social Darwin is your religion and you'll
>> > never deny it's dogma no matter HOW may facts
>
>> Present one.
>
>Sorry Olrik, but I only pointed out the nature of the debate. I'm not
>taking sides in it (no matter how I might be painted by your side).
>So I'm not here to spoon feed you facts relevant to EITHER viewpoint.
>And apparently even if I did you'd just deny them as your dogma
>rejects any such suggestions.

Translation: you have nothing to present.

>> > are staring you in the
>> > face. None so blind...etc.
>>
>> > You have no idea what true science is or how it works.
>
>> Tell us about it.
>
>And thus, I am also not here to provide you with a science education.
>There are still a few places where such can still be found. Seek one
>out.

Translation: you have nothing to present.