Proton Radius Cannot Be Derived From Standard Model
in [Relativity]
|
From: Robert L. Oldershaw on 29 Apr 2010 14:47 On Apr 29, 4:32 am, eric gisse <jowr.pi.nos...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > You are neither Planck or Einstein, so don't compare yourself. > > You've never studied physics past the college freshman level, have you? --------------------------------------------------- I know I am not Einstein or Planck. They are dead. Duh! When I took Quantum Mechanics at a major university I got an A. Any more insightful comments? RLO
From: Robert L. Oldershaw on 29 Apr 2010 14:50 On Apr 29, 6:22 am, Jerry <Cephalobus_alie...(a)comcast.net> wrote: > > Good luck to you, too. > > My hope is that with my intentionally rather harsh criticism, I > have managed to plant a seed of doubt in you, so that maybe you > can stand back and re-evaluate what you have been doing. ---------------------------------- The 95-particle mass/stability histogram is now available. Send me an email asking for it and I will attach a PDF to the reply. This, I promise you, is worth a look. No lasting offense taken, RLO www.amherst.edu/~rloldershaw
From: glird on 6 May 2010 12:06 On Apr 26, 6:24 pm, "Robert L. Oldershaw" <rlolders...(a)amherst.edu> wrote: > On Apr 26, 2:22 pm, glird <gl...(a)aol.com> wrote: > > > A new paradigm already exists. The trouble is that nobody, other > > than its sire, is willing or able to consider the merits of anything > > that disagrees with the old one embedded in their mind. > > Sad, but true. However, while that is the situation now, who knows > what the situation might be in the not-too-distant future? The > Ptolemaic paradigm eventually collapsed under the weight of its own > ungainly artificiality. I predict the same will eventually happen to > the substandard paradigm, starting with the just-so story known as > Quantum Chromodynamics, which is the weakest link of the substandard > model. The trouble with the present paradigm began with the Ancient Greek Philosophers' secret answer "No" to the unasked question "Is matter compressible". THAT is the reason they created the theory that Matter is made of particles traveling in an otherwise empty space. Although atoms do exist and are particles, they are made of and totally fillled with the same kind of COMPRESSIBLE
From: glird on 6 May 2010 12:24 On Apr 26, 6:24 pm, "Robert L. Oldershaw" <rlolders...(a)amherst.edu> wrote: > On Apr 26, 2:22 pm, glird <gl...(a)aol.com> wrote: > > A new paradigm already exists. The trouble is that nobody, other > > than its sire, is willing or able to consider the merits of anything > > that disagrees with the old one embedded in their mind. > Sad, but true. However, while that is the situation now, who knows > what the situation might be in the not-too-distant future? The > Ptolemaic paradigm eventually collapsed under the weight of its own > ungainly artificiality. I predict the same will eventually happen to > the substandard paradigm, starting with the just-so story known as > Quantum Chromodynamics, which is the weakest link of the substandard > model. The trouble with the present paradigm began with the Ancient Greek Philosophers' secret answer "No" to the unasked question "Is matter compressible". THAT is the reason they created the theory that Matter is made of particles traveling in an otherwise empty space. Although atoms do exist and are particles, they are made of the same kind of COMPRESSIBLE matter that fills each of them and the spaces between them too. Accordingly, the strongest link in the present paradigm, the kinetic atomic theory, is itself the "weakest link" of all present models. Once that is known, it becomes rather easy to work out the mechanisms of gravity, light, quanta, and everything else that exists in the universe. glird
From: mpc755 on 6 May 2010 12:29
On May 6, 12:06 pm, glird <gl...(a)aol.com> wrote: > On Apr 26, 6:24 pm, "Robert L. Oldershaw" <rlolders...(a)amherst.edu> > wrote: > > > On Apr 26, 2:22 pm, glird <gl...(a)aol.com> wrote: > > > > A new paradigm already exists. The trouble is that nobody, other > > > than its sire, is willing or able to consider the merits of anything > > > that disagrees with the old one embedded in their mind. > > > Sad, but true. However, while that is the situation now, who knows > > what the situation might be in the not-too-distant future? The > > Ptolemaic paradigm eventually collapsed under the weight of its own > > ungainly artificiality. I predict the same will eventually happen to > > the substandard paradigm, starting with the just-so story known as > > Quantum Chromodynamics, which is the weakest link of the substandard > > model. > > The trouble with the present paradigm began with the Ancient Greek > Philosophers' secret answer "No" to the unasked question "Is matter > compressible". THAT is the reason they created the theory that Matter > is made of particles traveling in an otherwise empty space. > Although atoms do exist and are particles, they are made of and > totally fillled with the same kind of COMPRESSIBLE Exactly. I think it is conceptually cleaner to name the 'compressible'. I have named it mæther. Matter is compressed mæther and aether is uncompressed mæther. |