Proton Radius Cannot Be Derived From Standard Model
in [Relativity]
|
From: PD on 7 May 2010 08:33 On May 7, 12:09 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On May 6, 2:06 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On May 6, 11:32 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On May 6, 12:24 pm, glird <gl...(a)aol.com> wrote: > > > > > On Apr 26, 6:24 pm, "Robert L. Oldershaw" <rlolders...(a)amherst.edu> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > On Apr 26, 2:22 pm, glird <gl...(a)aol.com> wrote: > > > > > > A new paradigm already exists. The trouble is that nobody, other > > > > > > than its sire, is willing or able to consider the merits of anything > > > > > > that disagrees with the old one embedded in their mind. > > > > > Sad, but true. However, while that is the situation now, who knows > > > > > what the situation might be in the not-too-distant future? The > > > > > Ptolemaic paradigm eventually collapsed under the weight of its own > > > > > ungainly artificiality. I predict the same will eventually happen to > > > > > the substandard paradigm, starting with the just-so story known as > > > > > Quantum Chromodynamics, which is the weakest link of the substandard > > > > > model. > > > > > The trouble with the present paradigm began with > > > > the Ancient Greek Philosophers' secret answer "No" > > > > to the unasked question "Is matter compressible". > > > > THAT is the reason they created the theory that Matter > > > > is made of particles traveling in an otherwise empty space. > > > > Although atoms do exist and are particles, they are made > > > > of the same kind of COMPRESSIBLE matter that fills each > > > > of them and the spaces between them too. > > > > Accordingly, the strongest link in the present paradigm, > > > > the kinetic atomic theory, is itself the "weakest link" of all > > > > present models. > > > > > Once that is known, it becomes rather easy to work out the > > > > mechanisms of gravity, light, quanta, and everything else that > > > > exists in the universe. > > > > > glird > > > > Exactly. > > > > I think it is conceptually clearer to name the 'compressible' and to > > > describe matter and aether as states of it. I have named it mæther. > > > Matter is compressed mæther and aether is uncompressed mæther. > > > Personally, I think it is conceptually clearer to name flatworms and > > nematodes as states of mæther. > > You would. Makes as much sense as what you're doing.
From: mpc755 on 7 May 2010 08:53 On May 7, 8:33 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On May 7, 12:09 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On May 6, 2:06 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On May 6, 11:32 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On May 6, 12:24 pm, glird <gl...(a)aol.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Apr 26, 6:24 pm, "Robert L. Oldershaw" <rlolders...(a)amherst.edu> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > On Apr 26, 2:22 pm, glird <gl...(a)aol.com> wrote: > > > > > > > A new paradigm already exists. The trouble is that nobody, other > > > > > > > than its sire, is willing or able to consider the merits of anything > > > > > > > that disagrees with the old one embedded in their mind. > > > > > > Sad, but true. However, while that is the situation now, who knows > > > > > > what the situation might be in the not-too-distant future? The > > > > > > Ptolemaic paradigm eventually collapsed under the weight of its own > > > > > > ungainly artificiality. I predict the same will eventually happen to > > > > > > the substandard paradigm, starting with the just-so story known as > > > > > > Quantum Chromodynamics, which is the weakest link of the substandard > > > > > > model. > > > > > > The trouble with the present paradigm began with > > > > > the Ancient Greek Philosophers' secret answer "No" > > > > > to the unasked question "Is matter compressible". > > > > > THAT is the reason they created the theory that Matter > > > > > is made of particles traveling in an otherwise empty space. > > > > > Although atoms do exist and are particles, they are made > > > > > of the same kind of COMPRESSIBLE matter that fills each > > > > > of them and the spaces between them too. > > > > > Accordingly, the strongest link in the present paradigm, > > > > > the kinetic atomic theory, is itself the "weakest link" of all > > > > > present models. > > > > > > Once that is known, it becomes rather easy to work out the > > > > > mechanisms of gravity, light, quanta, and everything else that > > > > > exists in the universe. > > > > > > glird > > > > > Exactly. > > > > > I think it is conceptually clearer to name the 'compressible' and to > > > > describe matter and aether as states of it. I have named it mæther. > > > > Matter is compressed mæther and aether is uncompressed mæther. > > > > Personally, I think it is conceptually clearer to name flatworms and > > > nematodes as states of mæther. > > > You would. > > Makes as much sense as what you're doing. Only because you are conceptually deficient and in a state of delusional denial. You are the epitome of what is incorrect with physics. Physics today: - mistakes mathematics for nature. - mistakes energy for cause. I have named the 'compressible material' mæther. Matter and aether are states of mæther. Matter is compressed mæther and aether is uncompressed mæther.
From: mpc755 on 7 May 2010 09:44 On May 7, 8:33 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On May 7, 12:09 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On May 6, 2:06 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On May 6, 11:32 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On May 6, 12:24 pm, glird <gl...(a)aol.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Apr 26, 6:24 pm, "Robert L. Oldershaw" <rlolders...(a)amherst.edu> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > On Apr 26, 2:22 pm, glird <gl...(a)aol.com> wrote: > > > > > > > A new paradigm already exists. The trouble is that nobody, other > > > > > > > than its sire, is willing or able to consider the merits of anything > > > > > > > that disagrees with the old one embedded in their mind. > > > > > > Sad, but true. However, while that is the situation now, who knows > > > > > > what the situation might be in the not-too-distant future? The > > > > > > Ptolemaic paradigm eventually collapsed under the weight of its own > > > > > > ungainly artificiality. I predict the same will eventually happen to > > > > > > the substandard paradigm, starting with the just-so story known as > > > > > > Quantum Chromodynamics, which is the weakest link of the substandard > > > > > > model. > > > > > > The trouble with the present paradigm began with > > > > > the Ancient Greek Philosophers' secret answer "No" > > > > > to the unasked question "Is matter compressible". > > > > > THAT is the reason they created the theory that Matter > > > > > is made of particles traveling in an otherwise empty space. > > > > > Although atoms do exist and are particles, they are made > > > > > of the same kind of COMPRESSIBLE matter that fills each > > > > > of them and the spaces between them too. > > > > > Accordingly, the strongest link in the present paradigm, > > > > > the kinetic atomic theory, is itself the "weakest link" of all > > > > > present models. > > > > > > Once that is known, it becomes rather easy to work out the > > > > > mechanisms of gravity, light, quanta, and everything else that > > > > > exists in the universe. > > > > > > glird > > > > > Exactly. > > > > > I think it is conceptually clearer to name the 'compressible' and to > > > > describe matter and aether as states of it. I have named it mæther. > > > > Matter is compressed mæther and aether is uncompressed mæther. > > > > Personally, I think it is conceptually clearer to name flatworms and > > > nematodes as states of mæther. > > > You would. > > Makes as much sense as what you're doing. Only because you are conceptually deficient and in a state of delusional denial. You are the epitome of what is incorrect with physics. Physics today: - mistakes mathematics for nature. - mistakes energy for cause. I have named the 'compressible material' mæther. Matter and aether are states of mæther. Matter is compressed mæther and aether is uncompressed mæther. 'DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT? By A. EINSTEIN' http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf "If a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its mass diminishes by L/c2." The mass of the body does diminish, but the matter which no longer exists as part of the body has not vanished. It still exists, as aether. As the matter transitions to aether it expands in three dimensions. The effect this transition has on the surrounding aether and matter is energy. Mæther decompressing is the cause. Energy is the effect.
From: mpc755 on 8 May 2010 05:25 On May 7, 8:33 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On May 7, 12:09 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On May 6, 2:06 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On May 6, 11:32 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On May 6, 12:24 pm, glird <gl...(a)aol.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Apr 26, 6:24 pm, "Robert L. Oldershaw" <rlolders...(a)amherst.edu> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > On Apr 26, 2:22 pm, glird <gl...(a)aol.com> wrote: > > > > > > > A new paradigm already exists. The trouble is that nobody, other > > > > > > > than its sire, is willing or able to consider the merits of anything > > > > > > > that disagrees with the old one embedded in their mind. > > > > > > Sad, but true. However, while that is the situation now, who knows > > > > > > what the situation might be in the not-too-distant future? The > > > > > > Ptolemaic paradigm eventually collapsed under the weight of its own > > > > > > ungainly artificiality. I predict the same will eventually happen to > > > > > > the substandard paradigm, starting with the just-so story known as > > > > > > Quantum Chromodynamics, which is the weakest link of the substandard > > > > > > model. > > > > > > The trouble with the present paradigm began with > > > > > the Ancient Greek Philosophers' secret answer "No" > > > > > to the unasked question "Is matter compressible". > > > > > THAT is the reason they created the theory that Matter > > > > > is made of particles traveling in an otherwise empty space. > > > > > Although atoms do exist and are particles, they are made > > > > > of the same kind of COMPRESSIBLE matter that fills each > > > > > of them and the spaces between them too. > > > > > Accordingly, the strongest link in the present paradigm, > > > > > the kinetic atomic theory, is itself the "weakest link" of all > > > > > present models. > > > > > > Once that is known, it becomes rather easy to work out the > > > > > mechanisms of gravity, light, quanta, and everything else that > > > > > exists in the universe. > > > > > > glird > > > > > Exactly. > > > > > I think it is conceptually clearer to name the 'compressible' and to > > > > describe matter and aether as states of it. I have named it mæther. > > > > Matter is compressed mæther and aether is uncompressed mæther. > > > > Personally, I think it is conceptually clearer to name flatworms and > > > nematodes as states of mæther. > > > You would. > > Makes as much sense as what you're doing. Physics today: - mistakes mathematics for nature. - mistakes energy for cause. I have named the 'compressible material' mæther. Matter and aether are states of mæther. Matter is compressed mæther and aether is uncompressed mæther. 'DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT? By A. EINSTEIN' http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf "If a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its mass diminishes by L/c2." The mass of the body does diminish, but the matter which no longer exists as part of the body has not vanished. It still exists, as aether. As the matter transitions to aether it expands in three dimensions. The effect this transition has on the surrounding aether and matter is energy. Mæther decompressing is the cause. Energy is the effect.
From: PD on 8 May 2010 13:08
On May 8, 4:25 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On May 7, 8:33 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On May 7, 12:09 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On May 6, 2:06 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On May 6, 11:32 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On May 6, 12:24 pm, glird <gl...(a)aol.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Apr 26, 6:24 pm, "Robert L. Oldershaw" <rlolders...(a)amherst.edu> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Apr 26, 2:22 pm, glird <gl...(a)aol.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > A new paradigm already exists. The trouble is that nobody, other > > > > > > > > than its sire, is willing or able to consider the merits of anything > > > > > > > > that disagrees with the old one embedded in their mind. > > > > > > > Sad, but true. However, while that is the situation now, who knows > > > > > > > what the situation might be in the not-too-distant future? The > > > > > > > Ptolemaic paradigm eventually collapsed under the weight of its own > > > > > > > ungainly artificiality. I predict the same will eventually happen to > > > > > > > the substandard paradigm, starting with the just-so story known as > > > > > > > Quantum Chromodynamics, which is the weakest link of the substandard > > > > > > > model. > > > > > > > The trouble with the present paradigm began with > > > > > > the Ancient Greek Philosophers' secret answer "No" > > > > > > to the unasked question "Is matter compressible". > > > > > > THAT is the reason they created the theory that Matter > > > > > > is made of particles traveling in an otherwise empty space. > > > > > > Although atoms do exist and are particles, they are made > > > > > > of the same kind of COMPRESSIBLE matter that fills each > > > > > > of them and the spaces between them too. > > > > > > Accordingly, the strongest link in the present paradigm, > > > > > > the kinetic atomic theory, is itself the "weakest link" of all > > > > > > present models. > > > > > > > Once that is known, it becomes rather easy to work out the > > > > > > mechanisms of gravity, light, quanta, and everything else that > > > > > > exists in the universe. > > > > > > > glird > > > > > > Exactly. > > > > > > I think it is conceptually clearer to name the 'compressible' and to > > > > > describe matter and aether as states of it. I have named it mæther. > > > > > Matter is compressed mæther and aether is uncompressed mæther.. > > > > > Personally, I think it is conceptually clearer to name flatworms and > > > > nematodes as states of mæther. > > > > You would. > > > Makes as much sense as what you're doing. > > Physics today: > - mistakes mathematics for nature. > - mistakes energy for cause. Nah, it doesn't do either of those things. You should study up on what physics today really says. > > I have named the 'compressible material' mæther. Matter and aether are > states of mæther. Matter is compressed mæther and aether is > uncompressed mæther. > > 'DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT? By A. > EINSTEIN'http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf > > "If a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its mass > diminishes by L/c2." > > The mass of the body does diminish, but the matter which no longer > exists as part of the body has not vanished. It still exists, as > aether. As the matter transitions to aether it expands in three > dimensions. The effect this transition has on the surrounding aether > and matter is energy. > > Mæther decompressing is the cause. Energy is the effect. |