From: Jolly Roger on
In article <i1b3d0$o8t$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>,
Wes Groleau <Groleau+news(a)FreeShell.org> wrote:

> On 07-10-2010 16:33, Michelle Steiner wrote:
> > "Todd Allcock"<elecconnec(a)AnoOspamL.com> wrote:
> >> While I do want to access the iPhone's files from a PC via USB, it's not
> >> just to say I did- I want to be able to place files on the iPhone so
> >> that they'll be usable by the iPhone.
> >
> > I believe that this app (phone disk) will do just that. It's free (until
> > Aug 1), so why not give it a try?
>
> I�m having my doubts. As I posted earlier, I got errors
> (1) trying to save a graphic I had modified
> (2) trying to drag in a copy I had saved to my desktop.

It's possible the file(s) you tried to modify are protected. Ownership,
permissions, and other file system protection mechanisms are just as
valid on the iPhone as they are on Mac OS X.

--
Send responses to the relevant news group rather than email to me.
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my very hungry SPAM
filter. Due to Google's refusal to prevent spammers from posting
messages through their servers, I often ignore posts from Google
Groups. Use a real news client if you want me to see your posts.

JR
From: Jolly Roger on
In article <1jlfh7q.1tit0p817tpefgN%mikePOST(a)TOGROUPmacconsult.com>,
mikePOST(a)TOGROUPmacconsult.com (Mike Rosenberg) wrote:

> Jolly Roger <jollyroger(a)pobox.com> wrote:
>
> > That doesn't affect my impression.
>
> But does it impress your affection?

Not at all. : )

--
Send responses to the relevant news group rather than email to me.
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my very hungry SPAM
filter. Due to Google's refusal to prevent spammers from posting
messages through their servers, I often ignore posts from Google
Groups. Use a real news client if you want me to see your posts.

JR
From: Jolly Roger on
In article <i1b3nm$qkr$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>,
Wes Groleau <Groleau+news(a)FreeShell.org> wrote:

> On 07-10-2010 18:30, Hans Altmeyer wrote:
> > Don't know. It all depends on the programmer's skills. But I see your
> > point: Mistakes in trivialities can show a lack of attention in the
> > whole work of the company. Although this is only an indication. In the
> > end you only can be sure if you try out the piece of software by
> > yourself. (Nevertheless I could understand if somebody didn't feel like
> > testing in such circumstances.)
>
> And actually, I did take the chance. But after an advertised capability
> got errors in a test on "safe" data, not a chance I'm going to try it on
> anything important.

What data, exactly? "Safe" according to whom? You? How did you
determine this data was safe?

> I�ve had to take my Mac to single-user mode by changing something that
> �obviously� couldn�t hurt. I _don�t_ want to try to figure out how to
> do the equivalent on my phone!
>
> No, I am not interested in jail-break, so don�t ask. When I can afford
> to own two of them, I�ll be very interested then. :-)

That seems silly to me. Jail breaking is very easy to do, and undo. If
you had said you were waiting for your warranty to expire, I might
understand...

--
Send responses to the relevant news group rather than email to me.
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my very hungry SPAM
filter. Due to Google's refusal to prevent spammers from posting
messages through their servers, I often ignore posts from Google
Groups. Use a real news client if you want me to see your posts.

JR
From: Wes Groleau on
On 07-11-2010 09:08, Jolly Roger wrote:
>> > I¹m having my doubts. As I posted earlier, I got errors
>> > (1) trying to save a graphic I had modified
>> > (2) trying to drag in a copy I had saved to my desktop.
> It's possible the file(s) you tried to modify are protected. Ownership,
> permissions, and other file system protection mechanisms are just as
> valid on the iPhone as they are on Mac OS X.

Possible, but a pop-up that says "error 39" is not the
normal thing for trying to save a read-only file.

I did look at one directory in the shell. I was the owner
of every file, and the group was my 10.4 group ID. You may
remember that Apple in Tiger decided that every user's primary
group should be only for them and have the same name and number
as their user. Apparently I was not the only person frosted
about all the scripts I had to change, so they changed it back
and now I have to do the same AGAIN.

--
Wes Groleau

Methods meddling by amateurs
http://Ideas.Lang-Learn.us/WWW?itemid=889
From: Wes Groleau on
On 07-11-2010 09:10, Jolly Roger wrote:
> What data, exactly? "Safe" according to whom? You? How did you
> determine this data was safe?

As I stated earlier, it was the icon for an app I don't use
and intend to delete. Since the iOS does a chroot (or something
similar) on each app, that seemed safe enough.

> [not wanting to jailbreak] seems silly to me. Jail breaking is
> very easy to do, and undo. If you had said you were waiting
> for your warranty to expire, I might understand...

To each his own. That's what some people said about APE/Haxies
but I took the same attitude toward that. I like to play, but
I control the urge when I don't have a backup for the TOOL I'd
like to play with.

--
Wes Groleau

What if not everyone uses an expression? What then?
http://Ideas.Lang-Learn.us/barrett?itemid=1552