Radio Waves, Photons, and Wave Speed.
in [Relativity]
|
From: Androcles on 24 Dec 2009 22:35 "Ralph Garbage" <ralph.rabbidge(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:8e67c21c-0f4d-4faa-bf80-825e7a3e1a2e(a)v15g2000prn.googlegroups.com... On Dec 24, 4:49 pm, "Androcles" <Headmas...(a)Hogwarts.physics_q> wrote: > "Ralph Garbage" <ralph.rabbi...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > news:9b655805-acac-4a6a-bb81-4e21e833e9fb(a)v15g2000prn.googlegroups.com... > On Dec 24, 12:20 pm, HW@..(Henry Wilson DSc). wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 00:52:18 -0800 (PST), Ralph Garbage > > > <ralph.rabbi...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > >On Dec 23, 1:56 pm, "Paul B. Andersen" <some...(a)somewhere.no> wrote: > > >> On 23.12.2009 12:58, Ralph Garbage wrote: > > > >> > On Dec 22, 3:36 am, "Paul B. > > >> > Andersen"<paul.b.ander...(a)somewhere.no> > > >> > wrote: > > >> >> On 22.12.2009 11:49, Henry Wilson DSc wrote: > > > >> >>> On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 15:03:59 +0100, "Paul B. Andersen" > > >> >>> <paul.b.ander...(a)somewhere.no> wrote: > > >> >>>> | So if we receive 21 cm radiation emitted from an antenna, > > >> >>>> | photon density variations is used for waveform definition, > > >> >>>> | but if we receive 21 cm radiation from hydrogen, there > > >> >>>> | is no photon density variation, but the waveform is an aspect > > >> >>>> | of thephotons. > > > >> >>> correct... > > > >> >> SIC!!!!! :-) > > > >> >>>> Hilarious, no? > > > >> >>> not really. No. > > > >> >> So Ralph Rabbidge doesn't realize how hilarious his giant > > >> >> self-contradistinctions are. > > > >> >> This Rabbidge fellow isn't very bright, is he? :-) > > > >> > Henry Wilson DSc is really really genius! > > >> > You couldn't even come close to challenging his powerful mind. > > > >> I don't bite. :-) > > >You're all bark :P > > > >> But be aware that Ralph Rabbidge doesn't understand irony, > > >> he probably thinks you are serious. > > >> But that's what you want, right? :-) > > > >> -- > > >> Paul > > > >>http://home.c2i.net/pb_andersen/ > > > >You must be from Mesopotamia because you sure do BabbleOn. > > >I know you say to yourself: > > >"Is Henry Wilson DSc more stupid than dirt? > > > ... well dirt is never right, but at least it's never wrong ..." > > > >But that's because you can't follow his superior intellect! > > > >Of Henry Wilson DSc, > > >they will erect statues > > >ALL AROUND THE WORLD! > > > Of course...but will they be taller at the equator than at the poles? > > The NoWilsons will claim that they'll be thinner and younger. > > If they're built by the likes of Androcles, that closet relativist, > they'll probably be sculpted in various sheep shagging poses. > > ============================================ > Seriously, have you considered psychotherapy for your > Multiple Personality Disorder ? > Multiple personality disorder, or the dissociative identity disorder > (DID), > is commonly known as split personality. The personality of people > suffering > from this disorder is dissociated or split into two or more personalities. > These different personalities are completely distinct and the traits tend > to > surface unpredictably. There can be several possibilities and causes for > the > development of this disorder. > > Symptoms > a.. Sudden, distinct mood changes > b.. Hallucinations, depersonalization > c.. Display of unreasonable anger > d.. Amnesia, depression, anxiety > e.. Loss of memory, imaginary phobias > http://www.buzzle.com/articles/personality-disorder-symptoms.html I know you think you're funny. It's just to distract from Henry Wilson DSc's model and how really really genius it is. Henry Wilson DSc has brilliantly proven Einstein wrong and you are just SO jealous. Praise Henry Wison DSc!! The woman who got past Vatican security and toppled "Henry Wison DSc" on his way to midnight mass, length and time was not as mentally disturbed as "Henry Wison DSc", Pope of BaTh, WaSh and SoAp.
From: Inertial on 25 Dec 2009 22:46 "Henry Wilson DSc." <HW@..> wrote in message news:ig65j5pjehh1lblqg43a9v4lqqmslkd6p3(a)4ax.com... > On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 22:09:18 +1100, "Inertial" <relatively(a)rest.com> > wrote: > >> >>"Henry Wilson DSc." <HW@..> wrote in message >>news:ufq3j51avb4v0ojoel1fv3vlvo3a1ob6e4(a)4ax.com... >>> On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 15:23:27 +1100, "Inertial" <relatively(a)rest.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>>"eric gisse" <jowr.pi.nospam(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >>>>news:hgs5kd$no9$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... >>>>> HW@..(Henry Wilson DSc). wrote: >>>>> [...] >>>>> >>>>>> The photon stream contains a great many photons that have pretty >>>>>> random >>>>>> properties over a wide range. >>>>> >>>>> Uh, no. >>>>> >>>>> Antennas don't emit every frequency - they emit only a few. >>>> >>>>To be fair, he didn't say every frequency .. but did say a wide range. >>>>I >>>>guess that depends on how you define wide, but for a given radio signal, >>>>the >>>>range of frequencies needs to be fairly narrow. >>> >>> 'frequencies' of what? >> >>Derr .. the radio EMR used for radio broadcasts. You know .. what we were >>talking about. Gees .. are you THAT senile? > > That's NOT what we're talking about , dopey. > We're talking about the individual photon 'frequencies'. Yes .. that's what I just said. The EMR (which is the phtons) > The question you should be trying to answer is how charges that are > accelerating up and down an antenna would emit photons that are exactly > the > same as that of the applied signal. How could they do anything else? > You obviously don't have the faintest understanding of this so please go > quietly away. You obviously don't have the faintest understanding of this so please go quietly away.
From: Inertial on 25 Dec 2009 22:51
"Henry Wilson DSc." <HW@..> wrote in message news:tap5j55gek3a0fmrhekg2qa2gdb0ir4pl0(a)4ax.com... > On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 18:36:50 -0800, eric gisse <jowr.pi.nospam(a)gmail.com> > wrote: > >>HW@..(Henry Wilson DSc). wrote: >> >>[...] >> >>> >>> You obvously don't know enough physics to even understand the question >> >>The question is simple. You want someone to explain to you, for free, >>enough >>mathematics and physics to make you understand how an oscillating current >>can generate electromagnetic waves of a certain wavelength. > > No that is not the question. The answer to that one is obvious. c = l f where l = wavelength, and f = frequency. We know the frequency (in the FoR in which the antenna is at rest) and c, so can work out the wavelength (in that same frame) |