Radio Waves, Photons, and Wave Speed.
in [Relativity]
|
From: Paul Cardinale on 23 Dec 2009 15:55 On Dec 22, 8:23 pm, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > "eric gisse" <jowr.pi.nos...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > news:hgs5kd$no9$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... > > > HW@..(Henry Wilson DSc). wrote: > > [...] > > >> The photon stream contains a great many photons that have pretty random > >> properties over a wide range. > > > Uh, no. > > > Antennas don't emit every frequency - they emit only a few. > > To be fair, he didn't say every frequency .. but did say a wide range. I > guess that depends on how you define wide, but for a given radio signal, the > range of frequencies needs to be fairly narrow. > Generally yes. However there are exceptions. For instance, cell phones use spread spectrum technology. Paul Cardinale
From: Sam Wormley on 23 Dec 2009 16:19 On 12/23/09 1:56 PM, Ralph Garbage wrote: > On Dec 23, 11:03 am, Sam Wormley<sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> On 12/23/09 10:59 AM, Ralph Garbage wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Dec 23, 8:44 am, Sam Wormley<sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On 12/23/09 10:32 AM, Ralph Garbage wrote: >> >>>>> On Dec 23, 7:28 am, Sam Wormley<sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 12/23/09 9:15 AM, Ralph Garbage wrote: >> >>>>>>> NO! >>>>>>> I'M rubber and YOU'RE glue... (i.e. I bounce and YOU stick) >> >>>>>> True! You can't stay grounded Ralph--You bounce from >>>>>> misunderstanding to misunderstanding and unable to use >>>>>> mathematics correctly... no wonder you identify with >>>>>> rubber. >> >>>>>> I stick to principles of physics and you bounce about >>>>>> like an untutored fool! >> >>>>> Hitting the 'nog a bit early, are we? >>>>> You want to try again? >> >>>>> In the mean time: >>>>> Henry Wilson DSc is a GOD! >>>>> A GOD I say! >> >>>> Gods only exist in some people's minds.... get over it. >> >>> Your unsupported declarations are meaningless. >>> The only things of true significance is what goes on in Henry Wilson >>> DSc's mind! Avail yourself of his great wisdom and let it sink in. >>> All Hail Henry Wilson DSc!! >> >> I'll bet before you morphed into henri/henry, you got down >> on your knees to worship A. Einstein! > > Morphed in to henri/henry? I dream of being worthy enough to carry the > water of the Great Henry Wilson DSc! > > Worship Einstein? Hah! That SciFi writer? You've got to be kidding > me!! No, I wasn't kidding you, Ralph. Before you morphed into Henri/Henry, I'll bet you got down on your knees to worship A. Einstein! You seem like the worshiping type.
From: eric gisse on 23 Dec 2009 16:20 Sam Wormley wrote: [...] That's not Ralph.
From: eric gisse on 23 Dec 2009 16:20 Ralph Garbage wrote: [..] It'd be far more entertaining if you got into that with one of the resident morons, or Ralph proper.
From: Paul B. Andersen on 23 Dec 2009 16:56
On 23.12.2009 12:58, Ralph Garbage wrote: > On Dec 22, 3:36 am, "Paul B. Andersen"<paul.b.ander...(a)somewhere.no> > wrote: >> On 22.12.2009 11:49, Henry Wilson DSc wrote: >> >>> On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 15:03:59 +0100, "Paul B. Andersen" >>> <paul.b.ander...(a)somewhere.no> wrote: >>>> | So if we receive 21 cm radiation emitted from an antenna, >>>> | photon density variations is used for waveform definition, >>>> | but if we receive 21 cm radiation from hydrogen, there >>>> | is no photon density variation, but the waveform is an aspect >>>> | of the photons. >> >>> correct... >> >> SIC!!!!! :-) >> >>>> Hilarious, no? >> >>> not really. No. >> >> So Ralph Rabbidge doesn't realize how hilarious his giant self-contradistinctions are. >> >> This Rabbidge fellow isn't very bright, is he? :-) >> > > Henry Wilson DSc is really really genius! > You couldn't even come close to challenging his powerful mind. > I don't bite. :-) But be aware that Ralph Rabbidge doesn't understand irony, he probably thinks you are serious. But that's what you want, right? :-) -- Paul http://home.c2i.net/pb_andersen/ |