Prev: Moon Tickets Available
Next: Halexandria Update; Family Trees; Gods; Tiamat; Sitchin; von Daniken; KJV; sun stood still
From: Sam Wormley on 23 Dec 2009 09:52 On 12/23/09 5:58 AM, Ralph Garbage wrote: > > Henry Wilson DSc is really really genius! > You couldn't even come close to challenging his powerful mind. > Henri's and you posting records show otherwise.
From: Ralph Garbage on 23 Dec 2009 09:57 On Dec 23, 6:52 am, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On 12/23/09 5:58 AM, Ralph Garbage wrote: > > > > > Henry Wilson DSc is really really genius! > > You couldn't even come close to challenging his powerful mind. > > Henri's and you posting records show otherwise. I'm rubber and you're glue... You are unworthy to even stand in Henry Wilson DSc's shadow!
From: Sam Wormley on 23 Dec 2009 14:03 On 12/23/09 10:59 AM, Ralph Garbage wrote: > On Dec 23, 8:44 am, Sam Wormley<sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> On 12/23/09 10:32 AM, Ralph Garbage wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Dec 23, 7:28 am, Sam Wormley<sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On 12/23/09 9:15 AM, Ralph Garbage wrote: >> >>>>> NO! >>>>> I'M rubber and YOU'RE glue... (i.e. I bounce and YOU stick) >> >>>> True! You can't stay grounded Ralph--You bounce from >>>> misunderstanding to misunderstanding and unable to use >>>> mathematics correctly... no wonder you identify with >>>> rubber. >> >>>> I stick to principles of physics and you bounce about >>>> like an untutored fool! >> >>> Hitting the 'nog a bit early, are we? >>> You want to try again? >> >>> In the mean time: >>> Henry Wilson DSc is a GOD! >>> A GOD I say! >> >> Gods only exist in some people's minds.... get over it. > > Your unsupported declarations are meaningless. > The only things of true significance is what goes on in Henry Wilson > DSc's mind! Avail yourself of his great wisdom and let it sink in. > All Hail Henry Wilson DSc!! I'll bet before you morphed in to henri/henry, you got down on your knees to worship A. Einstein!
From: dlzc on 23 Dec 2009 14:12 Dear jmfbahciv: On Dec 22, 7:32 am, jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv(a)aol> wrote: > dlzc wrote: > > On Dec 21, 5:57 am, jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv(a)aol> wrote: > > ... > >> As somebody who is "geometry- > >> challenged", it is difficult to > >> think about light. I keep looking > >> at a crystal ball I have which > >> makes things appear upsidedown. > >> Even though I see the effect of > >> light going through the crystal, > >> I can't seem to get my brain to > >> "see" the geometry in my head > >> without paper and pencil. Trying > >> to "see" something that appears > >> as a particle and a wave at the > >> same time is very difficult. I > >> have similar problems with > >> fields in 3D. > > > That is the problem with our > > brains. We have to define the > > present in terms of the past, > > rather than realizing the brain > > of a child apperceives reality > > without having to carry that > > baggage around. Look to a new > > experience. No quantum object is > > either localized and brittle as a > > billiard ball, nor is it part of > > some infinitely divisible whole. > > The conundrum and quandry is based > > on our macroscopic prejudice. > > Sure. I also think the geometry > problems I have are hardware > problems. ;-) > > > You have seen the large "funnels" > > that you can place coins in that > > will spin around and around, to > > ultimately end up as a donation > > in a cup in its "black hole"? > > No, I don't think I've seen those. They were used as donation collectors in grocery stores for about 15 years, but I have not seen many on a few years. Here is one: http://www.spiralwishingwells.com/guide/physics.html > Are you talking about something > like an exhibit I saw at Chicago's > Museum of Science and Industry in > its math section? it had a huge > inverted cone-shaped platform (it > wasn't a cone but I can't think of > the correct term). Every 5 maybe > 10 minutes a steel ball would drop > and the ball would travel through > arcs on this platform. Eventually > the arcs would be shorter and > shorter and the ball would drop > through the narrow cone piece. > > > You can form a "wavefront" of > > coins and achieve all sorts > > "optical" phenomenon. > > > Wave models allow us to model > > really huge numbers of photons, > > and achieve a desired result. > > They are handy approximations. > > They are tools. Put down the > > hammer, and stop seeing the world > > around you as comprised of nails... > > ;>) > > Or screws :-). > > My mother just gave me one of the > two gyroscopes that Dad bought > when we were kids. I was going to > use it to play physics. She gave > me the busted one :-(. Seems like all the good toy stores are gone (FAO Schwartz and Sharper Image) near me, so that leaves on-line... > those things are another example > of puzzlement :-). I just want to know how waterfalls make ozone... David A. Smith
From: eric gisse on 23 Dec 2009 15:11
Benj wrote: [...] Such confidence for knowing so little. |