From: Ralph Garbage on
On Dec 23, 6:20 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote:
> "Ralph Garbage" <ralph.rabbi...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:e3ecd4b3-4258-415d-b38a-37e6824966c8(a)u18g2000pro.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
> > On Dec 23, 5:23 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote:
> >> "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> >>news:25bb5813-c866-4c89-b7ce-f8f7f96e64cb(a)m16g2000yqc.googlegroups.com....
>
> >> > On Dec 23, 1:59 pm, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote:
> >> >> "Ralph Garbage" <ralph.rabbi...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> >> >>news:a6f48879-e9b4-496f-8384-91a9adc2a959(a)w19g2000pre.googlegroups.com...
>
> >> >> > On Dec 22, 3:36 am, "Paul B. Andersen"
> >> >> > <paul.b.ander...(a)somewhere.no>
> >> >> > wrote:
> >> >> >> On 22.12.2009 11:49, Henry Wilson DSc wrote:
>
> >> >> >> > On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 15:03:59 +0100, "Paul B. Andersen"
> >> >> >> > <paul.b.ander...(a)somewhere.no>  wrote:
>
> >> >> >> >> On 21.12.2009 01:38, Henry Wilson DSc wrote:
> >> >> >> >>> There are still some people here who believe that a radio wave
> >> >> >> >>> is
> >> >> >> >>> of
> >> >> >> >>> similar
> >> >> >> >>> nature to a gamma particle and consists of a single photon.
> >> >> >> >>> Others
> >> >> >> >>> think it is
> >> >> >> >>> a Maxwellian type wave in an aether. How naive.
>
> >> >> >> >>> I suggest that a radio wave is made by modulating the emission
> >> >> >> >>> rate
> >> >> >> >>> of a great
> >> >> >> >>> many 'white' photons. The 'wave' is determined by varying the
> >> >> >> >>> photon
> >> >> >> >>> energy
> >> >> >> >>> density and is projected over a wide angle at c wrt the
> >> >> >> >>> broadcasting
> >> >> >> >>> antenna.
>
> >> >> >> >> This is WILSON'S RADIATION LAW again, isn't it?
> >> >> >> >> Or has the law changed?
> >> >> >> >> Is RABBIDGE'S RADIATION LAW different?
>
> >> >> >> >> |Dr. Henri Wilson wrote March 26, 2009:
> >> >> >> >> || On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 22:38:59 +0100, "Paul B. Andersen"
> >> >> >> >> ||<paul.b.ander...(a)somewhere.no>  wrote:
> >> >> >> >> ||
> >> >> >> >> ||| Dr. Henri Wilson wrote:
> >> >> >> >> |||| Radio signals use photon density variations for waveform
> >> >> >> >> definition.......
> >> >> >> >> |||| WILSON'S RADIATION LAW.
> >> >> >> >> |||
> >> >> >> >> ||| OK, Henri.
> >> >> >> >> ||| Apply 'WILSON'S RADIATION LAW' on this real world example:
> >> >> >> >> |||
> >> >> >> >> ||| In the interstellar medium there are regions of cold
> >> >> >> >> hydrogen.
> >> >> >> >> ||| (Just about all the atoms are in ground state.)
> >> >> >> >> ||| From this hydrogen, we receive a 21 cm EM radiation.
> >> >> >> >> ||| We know that this radiation comes from the superfine
> >> >> >> >> transition
> >> >> >> >> ||| associated with spin reversal of the electron in ground
> >> >> >> >> state.
> >> >> >> >> ||| (The same as is used in hydrogen atomic clocks.)
> >> >> >> >> ||| When the spin reverses, a single photon is emitted/absorbed.
> >> >> >> >> ||| This process is stochastic, and on average each atom
> >> >> >> >> experiences
> >> >> >> >> ||| a transition once per ~10 million years. Since the density
> >> >> >> >> is
> >> >> >> >> ||| in the order of 30 atoms per cm^3, and one period of the
> >> >> >> >> radiation
> >> >> >> >> ||| is 0.7 ns, a bit calculation will show that you must have a
> >> >> >> >> volume
> >> >> >> >> ||| of 10^7 km^3 (a cube with 215 km sides) to have a 50%
> >> >> >> >> probability
> >> >> >> >> ||| for a transitions to take place within a specific period.
> >> >> >> >> ||| This means that there are hundreds of km between two atoms
> >> >> >> >> emitting
> >> >> >> >> ||| a photon within the same period.
> >> >> >> >> |||
> >> >> >> >> ||| How come these randomly emitted photons from far apart atoms
> >> >> >> >> ||| arrange themselves in a wavelike density distribution with
> >> >> >> >> ||| exactly 21 cm wavelength?
> >> >> >> >> ||
> >> >> >> >> || They don't, dopey. They don't have to. The individual photons
> >> >> >> >> have
> >> >> >> >> that
> >> >> >> >> || intrinsic wavelength.
> >> >> >> >> |
> >> >> >> >> | We agree, then.
> >> >> >> >> | What reaches the antenna is a flow of randomly spaced photons
> >> >> >> >> | with no wavelike density distribution. The wavelength is an
> >> >> >> >> | aspect of every photon.
> >> >> >> >> |
> >> >> >> >> | So why did you previously say:
> >> >> >> >> | "Radio signals use photon density variations for waveform
> >> >> >> >> definition"
> >> >> >> >> | when you now say it is wrong?
> >> >> >> >> ||
> >> >> >> >> ||| Is there a drill sergeant?
> >> >> >> >> ||
> >> >> >> >> || This is not the same process as that which occurs when a high
> >> >> >> >> frequency AC
> >> >> >> >> || current moves around an antenna. Do you understand radiation
> >> >> >> >> from
> >> >> >> >> an
> >> >> >> >> || accelerating charge?
> >> >> >> >> |
> >> >> >> >> | So if we receive 21 cm radiation emitted from an antenna,
> >> >> >> >> | photon density variations is used for waveform definition,
> >> >> >> >> | but if we receive 21 cm radiation from hydrogen, there
> >> >> >> >> | is no photon density variation, but the waveform is an aspect
> >> >> >> >> | of the photons.
>
> >> >> >> > correct...
>
> >> >> >> SIC!!!!! :-)
>
> >> >> >> >> Hilarious, no?
>
> >> >> >> > not really. No.
>
> >> >> >> So Ralph Rabbidge doesn't realize how hilarious his giant
> >> >> >> self-contradistinctions are.
>
> >> >> >> This Rabbidge fellow isn't very bright, is he? :-)
>
> >> >> > Henry Wilson DSc is really really genius!
> >> >> > You couldn't even come close to challenging his powerful mind.
>
> >> >> BAHAHAHAHA .. hysterical
>
> >> > ------------------
> >> > psychopath!!
>
> >> So .. you're going to stalk me posting insults now .. how childish of
> >> you.
> >> not really different to your usual behavior actually.
>
> > He obviously just took exception to your hysterical comment, and
> > worships Henry Wilson DSc as soon EVERYONE will!
> > Henry Wilson DSc rules!
>
> BAHAHAHAHHA.  No .. he's just a senile old psycho stalker (Porat, that is,
> not Henry .. but then, on second thoughts....)

On second thought you recognize the brilliance, majesty and pageantry
of Henry Wilson DSc!!
From: Ralph Garbage on
On Dec 23, 11:03 am, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On 12/23/09 10:59 AM, Ralph Garbage wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Dec 23, 8:44 am, Sam Wormley<sworml...(a)gmail.com>  wrote:
> >> On 12/23/09 10:32 AM, Ralph Garbage wrote:
>
> >>> On Dec 23, 7:28 am, Sam Wormley<sworml...(a)gmail.com>    wrote:
> >>>> On 12/23/09 9:15 AM, Ralph Garbage wrote:
>
> >>>>> NO!
> >>>>> I'M rubber and YOU'RE glue... (i.e. I bounce and YOU stick)
>
> >>>>      True! You can't stay grounded Ralph--You bounce from
> >>>>      misunderstanding to misunderstanding and unable to use
> >>>>      mathematics correctly... no wonder you identify with
> >>>>      rubber.
>
> >>>>      I stick to principles of physics and you bounce about
> >>>>      like an untutored fool!
>
> >>> Hitting the 'nog a bit early, are we?
> >>> You want to try again?
>
> >>> In the mean time:
> >>> Henry Wilson DSc is a GOD!
> >>> A GOD I say!
>
> >>     Gods only exist in some people's minds.... get over it.
>
> > Your unsupported declarations are meaningless.
> > The only things of true significance is what goes on in Henry Wilson
> > DSc's mind! Avail yourself of his great wisdom and let it sink in.
> > All Hail Henry Wilson DSc!!
>
>    I'll bet before you morphed in to henri/henry, you got down
>    on your knees to worship A. Einstein!

Morphed in to henri/henry? I dream of being worthy enough to carry the
water of the Great Henry Wilson DSc!

Worship Einstein? Hah! That SciFi writer? You've got to be kidding
me!!
From: Sam Wormley on
On 12/23/09 1:56 PM, Ralph Garbage wrote:
> On Dec 23, 11:03 am, Sam Wormley<sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 12/23/09 10:59 AM, Ralph Garbage wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Dec 23, 8:44 am, Sam Wormley<sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On 12/23/09 10:32 AM, Ralph Garbage wrote:
>>
>>>>> On Dec 23, 7:28 am, Sam Wormley<sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On 12/23/09 9:15 AM, Ralph Garbage wrote:
>>
>>>>>>> NO!
>>>>>>> I'M rubber and YOU'RE glue... (i.e. I bounce and YOU stick)
>>
>>>>>> True! You can't stay grounded Ralph--You bounce from
>>>>>> misunderstanding to misunderstanding and unable to use
>>>>>> mathematics correctly... no wonder you identify with
>>>>>> rubber.
>>
>>>>>> I stick to principles of physics and you bounce about
>>>>>> like an untutored fool!
>>
>>>>> Hitting the 'nog a bit early, are we?
>>>>> You want to try again?
>>
>>>>> In the mean time:
>>>>> Henry Wilson DSc is a GOD!
>>>>> A GOD I say!
>>
>>>> Gods only exist in some people's minds.... get over it.
>>
>>> Your unsupported declarations are meaningless.
>>> The only things of true significance is what goes on in Henry Wilson
>>> DSc's mind! Avail yourself of his great wisdom and let it sink in.
>>> All Hail Henry Wilson DSc!!
>>
>> I'll bet before you morphed into henri/henry, you got down
>> on your knees to worship A. Einstein!
>
> Morphed in to henri/henry? I dream of being worthy enough to carry the
> water of the Great Henry Wilson DSc!
>
> Worship Einstein? Hah! That SciFi writer? You've got to be kidding
> me!!

No, I wasn't kidding you, Ralph. Before you morphed into Henri/Henry,
I'll bet you got down on your knees to worship A. Einstein! You seem
like the worshiping type.





From: eric gisse on
Sam Wormley wrote:

[...]

That's not Ralph.


From: eric gisse on
Ralph Garbage wrote:

[..]

It'd be far more entertaining if you got into that with one of the resident
morons, or Ralph proper.