Prev: Habberdabber! Warnerbee is our forlorn hope!
Next: Aquarium screen saver?
From: Mark Warner on 18 Apr 2010 18:08
Hito Shirezu wrote:
>
> baseless rodomontade.

Had to look that one up. I like it. Thanks. Learned something today.

--
Mark Warner
MEPIS Linux
Registered Linux User #415318
....lose .inhibitions when replying
From: Hito Shirezu on 18 Apr 2010 18:15
Mark Warner wrote:

> Hito Shirezu wrote:
>>
>> baseless rodomontade.
>
> Had to look that one up. I like it. Thanks. Learned something today.

Yerwelcome! :)
From: Craig on 18 Apr 2010 18:20
On 04/18/2010 03:08 PM, Mark Warner wrote:
> Hito Shirezu wrote:
>>
>> baseless rodomontade.
>
> Had to look that one up. I like it. Thanks. Learned something today.

Yup. It's a keeper. Thanks to the OP.

--
-Craig
From: Gordon Darling on 18 Apr 2010 18:37
On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 16:50:08 -0500, »Q« wrote:


>> "This test set is used to gauge products' ability to detect new and
>> unknown samples proactively, using heuristic and generic techniques."
>
> I don't have anything to add to that. I just thought it might help him
> to read it twice.

He can read? Bloody hell!





--
ox·y·mo·ron
n. pl. ox·y·mo·ra or ox·y·mo·rons
A rhetorical figure in which incongruous or contradictory terms are
combined, as in Microsoft Security, Microsoft Help and Microsoft Works.
From: za kAT on 19 Apr 2010 10:24
On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 18:30:47 GMT, Bear Bottoms wrote:

> za kAT <zakAT(a)super-secret-IPaddress.invalid> wrote in
> news:hqfidm$1a7$1(a)news.eternal-september.org:
>
>> On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 18:07:31 GMT, Bear Bottoms wrote:
>>
>>> za kAT <zakAT(a)super-secret-IPaddress.invalid> wrote in
>>> news:hqfgu1$m2r$1(a)news.eternal-september.org:
>>>
>>>> On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 17:45:30 GMT, Bear Bottoms wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> za kAT <zakAT(a)super-secret-IPaddress.invalid> wrote in
>>>>> news:hqffa2$akp$1(a)news.eternal-september.org:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 17:16:17 GMT, Bear Bottoms wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> za kAT <zakAT(a)super-secret-IPaddress.invalid> wrote in
>>>>>>> news:hqfcbm$kcg$1 @news.eternal-september.org:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 14:09:04 GMT, Bear Bottoms wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> why was this kept a secret?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> More important is why is Rising low and to the left?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> While they have improved their testing to include some reactives,
>>>>>>> they still have a long way to go. I'm tickled to see this post
>>>>>>> however, as it sustains my argument of past about their
>>>>>>> flawed/incomplete testing.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Only in your head. From what I remember just about everyone else
>>>>>> was/and still is aware that /no/ testing can be definitive, but
>>>>>> it's the best we've got, and what's more it's still flawed because
>>>>>> it doesn't test for stray banana custard on my t shirt.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Your rememberance is flawed though the statement is a given, yet
>>>>> doesn't approach the actual events of discussion accurately.
>>>>
>>>> Don't troll me Bottom. There wasn't an open and honest discussion.
>>>> You couldn't provide /any/ credible evidence of the proactive
>>>> defence you claimed Rising provided, and were roasted for it. You
>>>> could have just ended it there but you trolled on and on, and you
>>>> are still doing it. Again you have openly criticised this testing
>>>> and supplied nothing to backup your statement.
>>>>
>>>
>>> heh, the fact that they changed their approach proved my
>>> argument...you missed that eh?
>>
>> That doesn't follow, but of course you know that.
>>
>> If you want a productive discussion here, try providing some credible
>> criticism of what you think is wrong with their present testing
>> procedures.
>>
>
> Why, I provided a lot in the past that is over the head of most in this
> group...you think it is different now?

No, you're an advanced provider as most around here are not.

All I have to say is...John Fitzsimons.
--
zakAT(a)pooh.the.cat - www.zakATsKopterChat.com
First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5
Prev: Habberdabber! Warnerbee is our forlorn hope!
Next: Aquarium screen saver?