Prev: PhraseExpress ?
Next: Astro-related freeware
From: John Corliss on 1 Apr 2010 09:21 Johnw wrote: > John Corliss wrote : > >> My registry backup using ERUNT is currently 44.6 mb in size. > > I just exported my registry onto the desktop to check it's size. It's > 86.2 MB. Good God. Is there any doubt at this point that Microsoft and-or the government(s) are hiding stuff in the registry? I have entire e-books that are only about a half a meg in size, and those are the large ones. It's hard to believe that all the necessary settings for the Windows OS and any installed programs can't be stored in a file the size of a novel. -- John Corliss BS206. I block all Google Groups posts due to Googlespam, and as many posts from anonymous remailers (like x-privat.org for eg.) as possible due to forgeries posted through them. No ad, CD, commercial, cripple, demo, nag, share, spy, time-limited, trial or web wares OR warez for me, please. Adobe Flash sucks, DivX rules.
From: UnsteadyKen on 1 Apr 2010 12:14 John Corliss said... > I have entire e-books that are only about a half a meg in size, and > those are the large ones. It's hard to believe that all the necessary > settings for the Windows OS and any installed programs can't be stored > in a file the size of a novel. Just exported my Vista reg and it's 290 MB (304,160,768 bytes) why on earth is it that size? Could something be wrong with my setup? -- Ken O'Meara http://www.btinternet.com/~unsteadyken/
From: Ron on 1 Apr 2010 13:24 On 4/1/2010 9:14 AM, UnsteadyKen wrote: > John Corliss said... > >> I have entire e-books that are only about a half a meg in size, and >> those are the large ones. It's hard to believe that all the necessary >> settings for the Windows OS and any installed programs can't be stored >> in a file the size of a novel. > > Just exported my Vista reg and it's 290 MB (304,160,768 bytes) why on > earth is it that size? Could something be wrong with my setup? > > Don't think so. Iirc, the Vista registry is much larger than XP's by default. May have something to do with Superfetch; must be a lot of registry devoted to that Vista "feature". Ron Moore
From: UnsteadyKen on 1 Apr 2010 14:24 Ron said... > Don't think so. Iirc, the Vista registry is much larger than XP's by > default. May have something to do with Superfetch; must be a lot of > registry devoted to that Vista "feature". Thanks Ron, the PC works well, I suppose it's no great size really, I can't get my head round how big files and programs are these days, still thinking in terms of my first HD at 20mb . -- Ken O'Meara http://www.btinternet.com/~unsteadyken/
From: Ron on 1 Apr 2010 14:28
On 4/1/2010 11:24 AM, UnsteadyKen wrote: > Ron said... > >> Don't think so. Iirc, the Vista registry is much larger than XP's by >> default. May have something to do with Superfetch; must be a lot of >> registry devoted to that Vista "feature". > > Thanks Ron, the PC works well, I suppose it's no great size really, I > can't get my head round how big files and programs are these days, > still thinking in terms of my first HD at 20mb . > 20mb???? Were you independently wealthy? Mercifully, I've forgotten the size of the HD on my 286 machine. (Not my first computer, just the first one that would run Windows 3.11) Ron Moore |