Registry cleaner ?
in [Windows XP Basics]
|
Prev: Font Printing
Next: Strange folders
From: Twayne on 11 Jan 2010 16:16 In news:Xns9CFAD2A23AF44thanexit(a)188.40.43.245, thanatoid <waiting(a)the.exit.invalid> typed: > "David H. Lipman" <DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net> wrote in > news:OHvLoBAkKHA.5020(a)TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl: > > <SNIP> > >>>>>> Rulle of thumb... >> >>>>>> Do NOT use so-called Registry Cleaners ! >> >>>>> You "rulle" of thumb is as good as its spelling. >> >>>> Forget the BS spelling faux pas... >> >>>> It is contraindicated to use so-called Registry Cleaners >>>> ! >> >>> OK, I'll bite... Why? >> >> Because the need for one is a myth > > I just LOVE specific replies! Bravo! > >> Use can cause MORE problems than they purport to solve. >> Problems that can be catastrophic. > > I /could/ ask for an example but judging by your "reply" to my > first question, I don't see much point. You've got it! Not a single one of the few posters here who spew the same misinformation over and over have anything they can cite or use to advance their point other than the occasional anecdotal, unverifiable post and the um, huh! Twayne
From: Twayne on 11 Jan 2010 16:18 In news:0006c74c$0$1558$c3e8da3(a)news.astraweb.com, Etaoin Shrdlu <etaoin(a)shrdlu.net> typed: > thanatoid wrote: >> "David H. Lipman" <DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net> wrote in >> news:OHvLoBAkKHA.5020(a)TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl: >> >> <SNIP> >> >>>>>>> Rulle of thumb... >>>>>>> Do NOT use so-called Registry Cleaners ! >>>>>> You "rulle" of thumb is as good as its spelling. >>>>> Forget the BS spelling faux pas... >>>>> It is contraindicated to use so-called Registry Cleaners >>>>> ! >>>> OK, I'll bite... Why? >>> >>> Because the need for one is a myth >> >> I just LOVE specific replies! Bravo! >> >>> Use can cause MORE problems than they purport to solve. >>> Problems that can be catastrophic. >> >> I /could/ ask for an example but judging by your "reply" to my >> first question, I don't see much point. >> > What you haven't done, for all of your posturing, is tell why you > think registry cleaning is a good idea. We know that there's always a > chance that a neophyte will "clean" something that will result in > trouble, and even if the chance is remote, there must be something > that makes the risk worthwhile. If you just want to clean out > orphaned entries because their presence bothers you, that's a > personal neurosis and not evidence of efficacy. Do you believe that > large numbers of orphaned entries cause a problem (such as > significantly slowing down the system) other than their mere > presence? If so, what objective evidence do you have? Note that "I > know my system's faster after registry cleaning" isn't objective > evidence. You're completely wrong. For answers to your own question see one of my other responses. As usual, you only think about orphaned entries and nothing else in your myopic state of unreadiness. You parrot but you know nothing about what you say. HTH, Twayne
From: Twayne on 11 Jan 2010 16:18 In news:Oi2MfHVkKHA.1824(a)TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl, Unknown <unknown(a)unknown.kom> typed: > You don't see much of anything. > "thanatoid" <waiting(a)the.exit.invalid> wrote in message > news:Xns9CFAD2A23AF44thanexit(a)188.40.43.245... >> "David H. Lipman" <DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net> wrote in >> news:OHvLoBAkKHA.5020(a)TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl: >> >> <SNIP> >> >>>>>>> Rulle of thumb... >>> >>>>>>> Do NOT use so-called Registry Cleaners ! >>> >>>>>> You "rulle" of thumb is as good as its spelling. >>> >>>>> Forget the BS spelling faux pas... >>> >>>>> It is contraindicated to use so-called Registry Cleaners >>>>> ! >>> >>>> OK, I'll bite... Why? >>> >>> Because the need for one is a myth >> >> I just LOVE specific replies! Bravo! >> >>> Use can cause MORE problems than they purport to solve. >>> Problems that can be catastrophic. >> >> I /could/ ask for an example but judging by your "reply" to my >> first question, I don't see much point. Said the almost most ignorant one
From: Unknown on 11 Jan 2010 16:24 What an out and out lie! Each and every time a poster posted the damage caused by a registry cleaner to their system you completely ignored and wouldn't respond. "Twayne" <nobody(a)spamcop.net> wrote in message news:uCPhaNwkKHA.4872(a)TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... > In news:Xns9CFAD2A23AF44thanexit(a)188.40.43.245, > thanatoid <waiting(a)the.exit.invalid> typed: >> "David H. Lipman" <DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net> wrote in >> news:OHvLoBAkKHA.5020(a)TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl: >> >> <SNIP> >> >>>>>>> Rulle of thumb... >>> >>>>>>> Do NOT use so-called Registry Cleaners ! >>> >>>>>> You "rulle" of thumb is as good as its spelling. >>> >>>>> Forget the BS spelling faux pas... >>> >>>>> It is contraindicated to use so-called Registry Cleaners >>>>> ! >>> >>>> OK, I'll bite... Why? >>> >>> Because the need for one is a myth >> >> I just LOVE specific replies! Bravo! >> >>> Use can cause MORE problems than they purport to solve. >>> Problems that can be catastrophic. >> >> I /could/ ask for an example but judging by your "reply" to my >> first question, I don't see much point. > > You've got it! Not a single one of the few posters here who spew the same > misinformation over and over have anything they can cite or use to advance > their point other than the occasional anecdotal, unverifiable post and the > um, huh! > > Twayne
From: Twayne on 11 Jan 2010 16:25
In news:uqfhdEAkKHA.1264(a)TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl, John John - MVP <audetweld(a)nbnot.nb.ca> typed: > Twayne wrote: >> In news:%23voSfK6jKHA.340(a)TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl, >> John John - MVP <audetweld(a)nbnot.nb.ca> typed: >>> Don't bother with these utterly useless registry cleaners, they >>> cause more harm than good. >> >> Completely untrue. Posted from ignorance and to be a gopher for a >> small group of registry cleaner libelists. Like any other program, >> just source a reliable program from a reliable web site. They don't do >> any >> harm or damage and they also allow you to undo any changes you make >> anyway. > > As usual and in your true form when ever these useless programs are > exposed for what they are you are here to defend your beloved cleaners > and to insult all who disagree with you. However, when people post > seeking help with real problems caused by these cleaners you are > nowhere to been seen. Most of us here have noticed that when it > comes to posts about registry cleaners you have a case of selected > blindness, and when you do reply to posts you usually leave your > brains and manners parked somewhere else. > > John Wrong. I only address those who make untrue statements without anything to back themselves up and which I know from education, research and experience to be completely wrong. e.g. you say "will" cause irrepairale damage, not "could" cause some kind of minor damage, and so forth. Even a preface of "in my opinion" in your posts would quiet me down. But that's not your posture and you know it. Your'e also wrong and you know it. As for your last sentence, projection won't do you much good; you have to become an actual thinking person as opposed to a mindless follower without anything to back up or verify what you claim. HTH, Twayne |