Relativistic Length vs Wavelength?
in [Relativity]
|
From: guskz on 28 May 2010 10:53 Relativistic length is observed to contract, where as presently at most, wavelength is only known to Doppler EXPAND (not contract). This wavelength effect does not only apply to light but also to all electromagnetic waves at all wavelengths. Considering planes can be faster than the speed of sound, could give us an interesting experiment? Considering that fluids such as water can be made to carry more pulses per second, than then some very low frequency electromagnetic radio waves, could give us an even more interesting experiment? Experiment to follow, and it may be contradicting to present relativistic knowledge.
From: bert on 28 May 2010 11:20 On May 28, 10:53 am, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > Relativistic length is observed to contract, where as presently at > most, wavelength is only known to Doppler EXPAND (not contract). > > This wavelength effect does not only apply to light but also to all > electromagnetic waves at all wavelengths. > > Considering planes can be faster than the speed of sound, could give > us an interesting experiment? > > Considering that fluids such as water can be made to carry more pulses > per second, than then some very low frequency electromagnetic radio > waves, could give us an even more interesting experiment? > > Experiment to follow, and it may be contradicting to present > relativistic knowledge. Gus Wavelength is the distance between successive peaks and troughs of a wave. The heart of QM is "wave-particle duality" of all objects in the universe both micro and macro realms. Then I think along the lines of "wave function" (probability waves) So I will end with wave function for many of my Micro Theories are founded TreBert
From: dlzc on 28 May 2010 12:13 Dear gu...: On May 28, 7:53 am, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > Relativistic length is observed to contract, > where as presently at most, wavelength is > only known to Doppler EXPAND (not contract). Blue shift. You apparently know nothing. > This wavelength effect does not only apply > to light but also to all electromagnetic > waves at all wavelengths. Electromagnetic waves are light. You do know nothing. > Considering planes can be faster than the > speed of sound, could give us an interesting > experiment? Did you know the exhaust stream from a jet engine goes faster than the speed of sound in air? What momentum-carrying particles will you propose that go faster than light? > Considering that fluids such as water can > be made to carry more pulses per second, With significant losses... > than then some very low frequency > electromagnetic radio waves, could give us > an even more interesting experiment? > > Experiment to follow, and it may be > contradicting to [guskz's] present relativistic > knowledge. Oh good, you are going to learn something? David A. Smith
From: Androcles on 28 May 2010 12:41 "dlzc" <dlzc1(a)cox.net> wrote in message news:4986ed63-1d6b-4925-b65f-a19f2091adce(a)t14g2000prm.googlegroups.com... Dear gu...: On May 28, 7:53 am, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > Relativistic length is observed to contract, > where as presently at most, wavelength is > only known to Doppler EXPAND (not contract). Blue shift. You apparently know nothing. > This wavelength effect does not only apply > to light but also to all electromagnetic > waves at all wavelengths. Electromagnetic waves are light. You do know nothing. ========================================= You should tell my satellite dish it is receiving light after the sun goes out, Smiffy. ========================================= > Considering planes can be faster than the > speed of sound, could give us an interesting > experiment? Did you know the exhaust stream from a jet engine goes faster than the speed of sound in air? What momentum-carrying particles will you propose that go faster than light? > Considering that fluids such as water can > be made to carry more pulses per second, With significant losses... > than then some very low frequency > electromagnetic radio waves, could give us > an even more interesting experiment? > > Experiment to follow, and it may be > contradicting to [guskz's] present relativistic > knowledge. Oh good, you are going to learn something? David A. Smith
From: BURT on 28 May 2010 14:06 On May 28, 7:53 am, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > Relativistic length is observed to contract, where as presently at > most, wavelength is only known to Doppler EXPAND (not contract). > > This wavelength effect does not only apply to light but also to all > electromagnetic waves at all wavelengths. > > Considering planes can be faster than the speed of sound, could give > us an interesting experiment? > > Considering that fluids such as water can be made to carry more pulses > per second, than then some very low frequency electromagnetic radio > waves, could give us an even more interesting experiment? > > Experiment to follow, and it may be contradicting to present > relativistic knowledge. Nobody has ever measured a flattened atom. NO. Space contraction has never been measured and it never will be because there are no flat atoms. Atoms would cease to work in physics. But time does slow down. MItch Raemsch
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 Prev: Hubble Red Shift Incorrect Next: Fundamental particles are all infinitely small |