Prev: Aether flow and round direction over energy
Next: Relativistic Length vs Wavelength?
From: guskz on 28 May 2010 00:52
As space stretches, we do not know if the wavelength of light also
stretches with it and by the exact same amount.

If so, then distances calculated based on Hubble redshifts are
Incorrect and likewise the Hubble constant.


The correct formula to follow, as well as the correct Hubble constant
for semi-distant stars.
From: guskz on 28 May 2010 01:00
On May 28, 12:52 am, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> As space stretches,  we do not know if the wavelength of light also
> stretches with it and by the exact same amount.
>
> If so, then distances calculated based on Hubble redshifts are
> Incorrect and likewise the Hubble constant.
>
> The correct formula to follow, as well as the correct Hubble constant
> for semi-distant stars.

The above is not based on the difference in velocity between source
and observer which applies to any moving objects in a non-expanding
space .... but in addition to it.
From: hanson on 28 May 2010 01:17

<guskz(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> As space stretches, we do not know if the wavelength of
> light also stretches with it and by the exact same amount.
> If so, then distances calculated based on Hubble redshifts
> are Incorrect and likewise the Hubble constant.
> The correct formula to follow, as well as the correct Hubble
> onstant for semi-distant stars.
>
hanson wrote:
yeah, yeah.. one's gotta love your guskian physics.
Tell me, Gus, besides "semi-distant stars" are there
also quarter-distant, full-distant, non-distant and
perhaps eve pi-distant stars? ---- With a properly
graduated and calibrated scale you could produce
an epoch making, work-easing system for the Astro
physicists.
So, till you do, Gus, thanks for the laughs... ahahanson
>
PS:
oh, yeah, what does that space of yours stretch into?

--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news(a)netfront.net ---
From: Don Stockbauer on 28 May 2010 01:25
On May 28, 12:17 am, "hanson" <han...(a)quick.net> wrote:
> <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>  > As space stretches,  we do not know if the wavelength of> light also stretches with it and by the exact same amount.
> > If so, then distances calculated based on Hubble redshifts
> > are Incorrect and likewise the Hubble constant.
> > The correct formula to follow, as well as the correct Hubble
> > onstant for semi-distant stars.
>
> hanson wrote:
>
> yeah, yeah.. one's gotta love your guskian physics.
> Tell me, Gus, besides "semi-distant stars" are there
> also quarter-distant, full-distant, non-distant and
> perhaps eve pi-distant stars? ----  With a properly
> graduated and calibrated scale you could produce
> an epoch making, work-easing system for the Astro
> physicists.
> So, till you do, Gus, thanks for the laughs... ahahanson
>
> PS:
> oh, yeah, what does that space of yours stretch into?

More space.

From: hanson on 28 May 2010 01:59

"Don Stockbauer" <donstockbauer(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> "hanson" <han...(a)quick.net> wrote:
> > <gusk(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > As space stretches, we do not know if the wavelength of
> light also stretches with it and by the exact same amount.
> > If so, then distances calculated based on Hubble redshifts
> > are Incorrect and likewise the Hubble constant.
> > The correct formula to follow, as well as the correct Hubble
> > onstant for semi-distant stars.
>
> hanson wrote:
> yeah, yeah.. one's gotta love your guskian physics.
> Tell me, Gus, besides "semi-distant stars" are there
> also quarter-distant, full-distant, non-distant and
> perhaps eve pi-distant stars? ---- With a properly
> graduated and calibrated scale you could produce
> an epoch making, work-easing system for the Astro
> physicists.
> So, till you do, Gus, thanks for the laughs... ahahanson
>
> PS:
> oh, yeah, what does that space of yours stretch into?
>
Stocky wrote:
More space.
>
hanson wrote:
if so...then why does space have to
expand/stretch in the first place?

 |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3
Prev: Aether flow and round direction over energy
Next: Relativistic Length vs Wavelength?