Release of RosAsm V.2.025a
in [ASM]
|
From: Guga on 18 Sep 2005 16:26 I Wrote: "either it is not considered an assembler. (not only by me) " If i´m not mistaken....you are also one more who don´t consider it an assembler ;) Guga
From: Guga on 18 Sep 2005 16:54 René, don´t forget GertFaller and his current work on the BCX Translations ;) and Fabricio with the portuguese translation of the B_U_asm. Richard The development team is working hard to improve the product, and we don´t have the tendence to keep on the path of "self-promotion at any cost". I guess i already answered that here, but, if you (Or anyone else, who is using or wants to use RosAsm) have questions, comments, criticts, ideas, methods, etc. about RosAsm, this NG is not the proper place for commenting technical aspects of it. The questions, comments, requests about the product should be done in the proper board at: http://www.quanta-it.com/easbell/RosAsmForum/index.php Currently we are only 7 working at the same time on different aspects of RosAsm. Anyone who wants to join and try to improve, can post on RosAsm board, and contact us. We still need to develop things like a good (If not perfect) H2Inc, the Interface for the ApiViewer (Which the internal data i already collected since sometime ago), a delphi form to asm, a VB form to asm, or any other features that people may feel necessary to improve. Just contact us, to we all discuss the ways to be done, or how it can be implemented. This is how we try to work. We try to work as a team. Everyone of us, before implement something big or meanfull in RosAsm, post it there and talk to each other. This is a way to we help on the development. So, if you have any idea or know how to implement or improve something, contact us at RosAsm board ;) Best Regards, Guga
From: sevagK on 18 Sep 2005 17:51 Guga wrote: > And this is a problem, because ....... ? > > Randalk said so, i presume ;) > Not really. 50 years of software engineering technology said so. > I strongly advice you to stick in HLA then. If you take Randall´s > advices serious, you really should use his product, either it is not > considered an assembler. (not only by me) > > Best Regards, > > Guga Besides HLA, there are also other fine choices; FASM, NASM, MASM, GOASM. MASM is probably the best choice as there is the most sample software for it, and Bogdan's game is written in MASM compatible mode I believe, which would be a great help. -sevagK www.geocities.com/kahlinor
From: Richard Cooper on 18 Sep 2005 20:29 On Sun, 18 Sep 2005 16:26:09 -0400, Guga <mauroteste(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > If iým not mistaken....you are also one more who donýt consider it an > assembler ;) Nope, and there's no way I'd ever use an assembler (or preprocessor in this case) that gets "dest, src" backwards, no matter how good it was. Doesn't mean that Randy can't make a valid point now and then.
From: randyhyde@earthlink.net on 18 Sep 2005 20:41
Guga wrote: > And this is a problem, because ....... ? > > Randalk said so, i presume ;) > > I strongly advice you to stick in HLA then. If you take Randall´s > advices serious, you really should use his product, either it is not > considered an assembler. (not only by me) Exactly whom are you responding to? I think that Richard has made it very clear that he is not an HLA user and has no interest in HLA. I think you've been hanging around with Rene too long and you've let his paranoia affect you too much. Believe it or not, *few* serious assembly language developers would *ever* consider a product that does not support linking of static object modules (e.g., libraries). This one omission alone will guarantee that RosAsm never garners any reasonable level of success. I think you'll find that *few* people who've used *any* kind of assembly language over the years would ever be tempted to switch to RosAsm; we're not just talking HLA users here. Cheers, Randy Hyde |